12.07.2015 Views

Crescent City Profile - California Sea Grant

Crescent City Profile - California Sea Grant

Crescent City Profile - California Sea Grant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

travel due to the much more limited fisheryopenings locally, working especially off SanFrancisco or Coos Bay, Oregon. During crabseason, most fishermen stay in the area to fish,although some local fishermen participatein the southern crab season opener off SanFrancisco. Coonstripe shrimp and rockfishhook-and-line fishing are focused locally.Because the catch is perishable and the timeand fuel costs associated with transiting by seais considerable, those who travel to fish usuallydeliver to a port near the fishing grounds eitherto a buyer who operates at <strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong> or toa different buyer.Revenue Per BoatTrends in aggregate revenues do not necessarilycorrelate with how individual vessels may befaring in terms of revenue. To illustrate this point,we estimated average annual revenue per boatfor <strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong> boats (defined as boats thatearned a plurality of their ex-vessel revenuesfrom landings at <strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong>). The number of<strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong> boats was 353–540 (average=475)between 1981 and 1984, declined to 102–301(average=201) between 1985 and 2002, thendeclined further to 88–122 (average=110)thereafter. Over these same periods, revenueper boat increased from $32,100–$41,300(average=$37,600) to $73,100–$121,200(average=$88,500) to $77,400–$216,200(average=$161,400); (Figure 16). The increase inaverage annual revenue per vessel between 1985and 2002 can be traced to the marked reductionin the number of small-revenue salmon trollersin the early 1980s. The more recent revenueincrease (since 2003) is largely due to unusuallyhigh crab landings during that period.To better understand how vessel revenue isaffected by an individual’s participation inparticular fisheries, we assigned each <strong>Crescent</strong><strong>City</strong> boat to its ‘principal fishery’, that is, thefishery from which the boat derived the pluralityof its annual revenue. For vessels associated witheach principal fishery, we then estimated averageannual revenue per boat (based on their landingsin all fisheries at all West Coast ports). Estimatesfor three-year periods over the last three decadesindicate a decline in the number of <strong>Crescent</strong>550225Boats500450400350300250200150100500Number of boatsRevenue per boat198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007Figure 16. Number of boats that earned a plurality of their revenue from landings at <strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong>, andaverage annual (total West Coast) revenue per boat, 1981–2007.<strong>Crescent</strong> <strong>City</strong> Fishing Community <strong>Profile</strong> 372001751501251007550250Revenue Per Boat (thousands, 2007$)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!