12.07.2015 Views

Modeling and Optimization of Traffic Flow in Urban Areas - Czech ...

Modeling and Optimization of Traffic Flow in Urban Areas - Czech ...

Modeling and Optimization of Traffic Flow in Urban Areas - Czech ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 Chapter 3 General Light Controlled Intersection ModelTable 3.2: Intersection parameterss d α s→d w s→d t s→d d s→d V s→d V s→[m·s −1 ] [s] [s/uv] [uv/s] [uv/s]1 10 0.21 7.2 20 0.69 0.361 7 0.79 13.9 20 0.36 0.690.582 6 1.0 13.9 20 0.36 0.69 0.693 9 1.0 13.9 52 0.36 1.81 1.814 8 0.77 13.9 52 0.36 1.814 7 0.23 7.8 47 0.64 0.911.815 6 1 7.8 47 0.64 0.91 0.91respondent lane. Thus, the <strong>in</strong>tersection places are supplied by the speedwhich is equivalent to the real data measured <strong>in</strong> the streets. Note that thedata from the step-wise filter is not constant dur<strong>in</strong>g the whole simulationtime. From this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view, the simulation time must be split <strong>in</strong>to severalshorter <strong>in</strong>tervals dur<strong>in</strong>g which the data is constant. These <strong>in</strong>tervals are simulatedseparately <strong>and</strong> the simulation result <strong>of</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>terval is used as an<strong>in</strong>itial condition for the second <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>and</strong> so on for the whole simulationtime.The result <strong>of</strong> the simulation is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.7. There are two representativeoutputs from lanes 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 <strong>in</strong> the unit vehicles per second. Thesimulation results for the other lanes are similar, hence they are not shown.Fig. 3.7(a) shows the real data from the detector (th<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e) versus the result<strong>of</strong> the CCPN model simulation (thick l<strong>in</strong>e). Fig. 3.7(b) shows the result<strong>of</strong> the CCPN model simulation versus the result <strong>of</strong> the discrete PN model(th<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e). The simulation based on the discrete PN uses the same real datawhich is used for preprocess<strong>in</strong>g by the step-wise filter described above. Theparameters <strong>of</strong> both cont<strong>in</strong>uous Petri net models are the same. The delaytime for the discrete PN model is taken from the column d s→d <strong>of</strong> Table 3.2.The figures show that the simulation model corresponds to the real system.The quality <strong>of</strong> the simulation can be analyzed from Fig. 3.7(c), where thesum <strong>of</strong> all the vehicles <strong>in</strong> lane 7 dur<strong>in</strong>g the simulation time is shown. Wecan see that the number <strong>of</strong> vehicles which flow through the <strong>in</strong>tersection issimilar for both models. The model based on the CCPN computes its statecont<strong>in</strong>uously <strong>in</strong> contrast to the discrete PN model where each vehicle <strong>in</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!