29.11.2012 Views

A Classic Thesis Style - Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

A Classic Thesis Style - Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

A Classic Thesis Style - Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 theoretical background<br />

taken into account and actually has the convenient effect of removing<br />

the VT denominator of the transition rate per unit volume since:<br />

(2π) 4 δ 4 (0)(2π) 4 δ 4 (pΛ + pK − pp − q) → VT(2π) 4 δ 4 (pΛ + pK − pp − q)<br />

(A.22)<br />

Next, we divide the transition rate per unit volume by the flux of<br />

incident particles |Jinc| and by the number of target particles per unit<br />

volume; which is 1/V according to our normalization. Finally, to get a<br />

physical cross section, we must sum over a given group of final states.<br />

The number of states for the final electron in a big box with periodic<br />

boundary conditions is dN = V<br />

(2π) 3 d 3 p ′ e and similarly for K + and Λ.<br />

�<br />

dσ =<br />

V 3 d3p ′ e<br />

(2π) 3<br />

d3pK (2π) 3<br />

d3pΛ (2π) 3<br />

V<br />

|Jinc| wfi<br />

(A.23)<br />

Along the electron direction, the incident flux times the remaining<br />

volume factor is given by (me = 0):<br />

JincV = Vrel<br />

V ≈ 1 (A.24)<br />

V<br />

what allow us to write:<br />

dσ =<br />

or<br />

where<br />

and<br />

� memP<br />

EeEp<br />

dσ = 4α2<br />

q 4<br />

|Mfi| 2 med 3 p ′ e<br />

(2π) 3 E ′<br />

d 3 p ′ e<br />

2E ′ e<br />

W µν = mpmΛ<br />

(2π) 3<br />

Lµν =<br />

(2me) 2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

d3pK (2π) 3EK LµνW<br />

EeEp<br />

µν<br />

mΛd3pΛ (2π) 3 (2π)<br />

EΛ<br />

4 δ 4 (pΛ + pK − q − pP − q)<br />

(A.25)<br />

(A.26)<br />

�<br />

d3�pK d<br />

2EK<br />

3�pΛ δ<br />

2EΛ<br />

4 (pk + pΛ − q − pp) 1 �<br />

µ +ν<br />

J J<br />

2<br />

(A.27)<br />

�<br />

jµj + ν = 2(p ′ eµ peν + p′ 2<br />

eνpeµ ) − gµνQ<br />

(A.28)<br />

Here we have already assumed that the electron beam and proton<br />

target are unpolarized, and that we do not measure the polarization<br />

of the outgoing particles. The summatory symbol, then, stands for<br />

averaging over initial state polarizations and summing over final states.<br />

In the final form of Lµν we have used standard trace techniques<br />

for spin summation [94]. These two expression are manifestly Lorentz<br />

second rank tensors. We follow the common practice to evaluate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!