THOUGHT LEADERSINDUSTRY EXPERTS SHARE THEIR VIEWS ON THE CURRENT ISSUES AFFECTING SPORTTHE DANGER OF SCRAPPING THE DCMSJOHN GOODBODYReports that the Department ofCulture, Media and Sport (DCMS)faces being scrapped after theOlympic Games has sent a shiver throughthe sporting establishment. After beingset up in 1992 and originally called theDepartment of National Heritage, it wasquickly nicknamed ‘The Ministry of Fun’and ‘the Ministry of Free Tickets.’ However,over the last 20 years, the governmentdepartment has gained in stature bygiving sport a much greater prominenceand also playing a key role in decidingthat London should bid for the Gamesand then wholeheartedly supporting thecandidature.The reason for scrapping the Departmentis, of course, to reduce costs. Ithas been suggested that its three maincomponents – culture, media and sport– should be hived off to other parts ofWhitehall, which is where they werebefore 1992. With negotiations currentlyunderway for a merger of UK Sport andSport England, it looks as if we will beback to where we were in the 1980s, whenthere was a <strong>Sports</strong> Council, responsiblefor both England and UK dimensions, andit, in turn, being responsible to a <strong>Sports</strong>Minister, who, at that stage, was with theDepartment of the Environment.Andy Reed, who chairs the Sport andRecreation Alliance, is among thoseconcerned about any dismantling of theDCMS, with sport then moving to join amuch bigger department, such as Education,where it was, briefly, before 1992.He says that in the DCMS, sport enjoysa higher profile than moving to a department“where it was a secondary concernor a tool to achieve a single, specific aim.”He believes that “given its proven effectivenessin contributing to a wide rangeof public policy objectives – like crimereduction, highereducational attainmentand improvedsocial cohesion –shoehorning sport into a departmentwhere primacy lies elsewhere would doit, and the nation, a great disservice.”As sport permeates so many areas ofsociety perhaps it could sit in the CabinetOffice, which has a wide-ranging role?Reed would reluctantly accept this butsays he would prefer for the DCMS to remainas an entity, with sport continuingto be a permanent fixture there. Surelythis is right, because returning to wherewe were in the 1980s is retrogressive. Thechange since then has worked and beenseen to work and should be allowed tocontinue to work in the future.John Goodbody has covered 11 successiveOlympic Games for the Sunday Times.@JohnGoodbodyCAPITALISING ON OUR GOLDEN DECADE OF SPORTSIMON JOHNSONhe clock is ticking down to thestart of Britain’s Golden Decade ofT Sport, with the <strong>2012</strong> Olympic andParalympic Games first on the calendarof major events. And it’s to my personalsorrow that as COO of England’s bid tohost the 2018 FIFA World Cup that weweren’t able to add that prized tournamentto the list of blue riband sportingevents taking place on these shores.As the new CEO of Business In Sportand <strong>Leisure</strong> (BISL), I recognise that ourmembers have a large impact on whetherthe objectives of hosting these majorevents are met.The first area is economic benefit andinward investment. Every time a bid ismade to host an event, an EconomicImpact Assessment is made by an independentbody. These invariably forecasta huge fillip to the country’s GDP and justifiesthe government in supporting theevent with guarantees, tax breaks andunderwrites of cost.Forty per cent of that economic benefitis assumed to come from visitor spend.And where will this money be spent? Theanswer is in bars, pubs, clubs, casinos, restaurants,hotels and visitor attractions. Athriving leisure industry is therefore thekey to us deriving the economic benefitfrom hosting these events.But if the fiscal and regulatory regimecontinues to over-regulate this sector, toburden it with unfair taxes and disproportionatecosts, not only will the industrynot grow, but businesses will close. So, ifvisitors can’t find opportunities to spendtheir money when they visit the UK towatch the 2013 Rugby World Cup, it meanswe risk squandering the economic reasonfor bidding for this event in the first place.The second area linked to event hostingis sports development legacy.The governmentwants to encouragemore peopleto be more activeand these events are expected to providethe motivation to take up sport. However,playing fields and leisure centres are disappearingor falling into disrepair due topublic sector cuts. The government needsthe private sector to step in to offer highqualityfacilities and our members arekeen to do so, but we need help to makeprocurement quicker and cheaper, to makeplanning more responsive to leisure needsand a system which rewards energy reductionand offers easier ways to raise capital.To prevent the Golden Decade of Sportfalling flat, the government needs to allowthe sports and leisure industry to grow.Simon JohnsonCEO, Business in Sport and <strong>Leisure</strong>simon.johnson@bisl.org8 Read <strong>Sports</strong> <strong>Management</strong> online sportsmanagement.co.uk/digitalIssue 2 <strong>2012</strong> © cybertrek <strong>2012</strong>
The FIA is looking to work withNGBs to get more people moreactive within member facilitiesChief executives areencouraging partners tocreate innovative,integrated servicesPIC: © WWW.SPORTENGLAND.ORGA NEED FOR INCREASED NGB/FIA COLLABORATIONDAVID STALKERs part of our Memorandumof Understanding with SportA England, the Fitness Industry Association(FIA) has pledged to work withmore national governing bodies of sport(NGBs) to get more people, moreactive, more often.Eleven of the top 20 sports (inrelation to participation levels, as detailedin Sport England’s Active PeopleSurveys) can take place within a healthclub or leisure centre.Operators of those facilities currentlysee more than one million people, everyday of the week. They have the capacityto see a million more. Eighty-nine percent of the country’s population liveswithin two miles of these facilities, whichhave seen a year-on-year increase in usagefor the past 20 years.So as the trade body for health andfitness, the FIA is committed to workingwith NGBs and NGBs must, in turn, workwith the FIA to achieve our overall objectivesto increase participation levels.The FIA have more than 3,000 facilityoperating members, who proactivelycontribute to the overall health and wellbeingof the nation. We want to get themost out of every activity and get moreconsumers doing physical activity, whetherthat is participating in a sport such asswimming at a leisure centre, or runningon a treadmill within a health clubenvironment or at a bootcamp sessionoutside – there are many opportunitiesto find a sport of their choice.The FIA has numerous partnershipprogrammes, such as Asda Active andShift into <strong>Sports</strong>, and we want to provideNGBs with the opportunity to beinvolved in these.We want to discover how we can helpto promote established NGB programmesthrough our operatormembers andexponentially growparticipation rates.We will also strive to support NGBsto develop their understanding of thehealth agenda and support their evidencebase for sport and physical activitythrough The FIA Research Institute at theUniversity of Greenwich.In the essence of partnership working,and the opportunity to learn first-handabout the FIA and find out some of theways that we could work together, theFIA is offering all Sport England-recognisedNGBs an FIA member rate to attendour fourth annual Flame Conference andBall of Fire, held at the Magna Centre inSheffield on the 27th June.David StalkerCEO, Fitness Industry Association@DavidStalkerIssue 2 <strong>2012</strong> © cybertrek <strong>2012</strong> Read <strong>Sports</strong> <strong>Management</strong> online sportsmanagement.co.uk/digital 9