12.07.2015 Views

v2007.09.17 - Convex Optimization

v2007.09.17 - Convex Optimization

v2007.09.17 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 CHAPTER 3. GEOMETRY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONSNext we use the Schur complement [204,6.4.3] [181] and matrixvectorization (2.2):minimizeX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject tot[tI vec(A − X)vec(A − X) T 1]≽ 0(485)S T XS ≽ 0This semidefinite program is an epigraph form in disguise, equivalentto (483); it demonstrates how a quadratic objective or constraint can beconverted to a semidefinite constraint.Were problem (483) instead equivalently expressed without the squareminimize ‖A − X‖ FX∈ S Msubject to S T XS ≽ 0(486)then we get a subtle variation:minimize tX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject to ‖A − X‖ F ≤ tS T XS ≽ 0(487)that leads to an equivalent for (486)minimizeX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject tot[tI vec(A − X)vec(A − X) T t]≽ 0(488)S T XS ≽ 03.1.7.2.1 Example. Schur anomaly.Consider a problem abstract in the convex constraint, given symmetricmatrix Aminimize ‖X‖ 2X∈ S M F − ‖A − X‖2 F(489)subject to X ∈ Cthe minimization of a difference of two quadratic functions each convex inmatrix X . Observe equality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!