30.11.2012 Views

Safety Evaluation Report of Barakah Units 1 and

Safety Evaluation Report of Barakah Units 1 and

Safety Evaluation Report of Barakah Units 1 and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58<br />

SER Summary-CLA <strong>Barakah</strong> <strong>Units</strong> 1&2<br />

6.0 – FUKUSHIMA LESSONS LEARNED SUMMARY<br />

This section summarizes the review <strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> the Fukushima event for the<br />

proposed <strong>Barakah</strong> site <strong>and</strong> facility. The FANR review <strong>of</strong> the Fukushima event will continue<br />

during the construction period including requests for information from ENEC.<br />

6.1 Overview <strong>of</strong> the Fukushima Event <strong>and</strong> Subsequent<br />

International Analyses<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the largest earthquakes in recorded history occurred on the east coast <strong>of</strong> Japan on<br />

11 March 2011.<br />

The nuclear power plants at the Fukushima Daiichi, Fukushima Daini, Higashidori,<br />

Onagawa, <strong>and</strong> Tokai Daini nuclear power stations were affected, <strong>and</strong> emergency systems<br />

were activated. All <strong>of</strong> these power plants successfully shut down immediately after the<br />

earthquake. However, the tsunami generated by the earthquake then struck the east coast<br />

<strong>of</strong> Japan.<br />

Fukushima Daiichi <strong>Units</strong> 1 through 4 were significantly damaged by the tsunami <strong>and</strong> by the<br />

subsequent accident sequences involving hydrogen evolution from overheated reactor fuel.<br />

The subsequent accident sequences resulted in damage to the reactor cores <strong>and</strong> significant<br />

release <strong>of</strong> radioactive materials beyond the site boundary.<br />

6.2 FANR Regulations Applicable to the Fukushima<br />

Review <strong>and</strong> Initial FANR Actions<br />

FANR-REG-06, Article 6 requires any applicant for a licence to construct a nuclear facility to<br />

provide “a description <strong>of</strong> how recent lessons learned <strong>and</strong> experience from other similar<br />

facilities, scientific <strong>and</strong> technical developments, as well as the results <strong>of</strong> any relevant<br />

research on protection <strong>and</strong> safety have been applied to resolve potential safety issues.”<br />

Pursuant to this Article, FANR issued a letter on 30 March 2011, to ENEC requesting a plan<br />

to evaluate <strong>and</strong> apply any applicable lessons from the event. Subsequently, FANR issued a<br />

letter [Letter No FANR/DDGO/ENEC/COR/00081/2011] to ENEC 4 July 2011, providing<br />

guidance to ENEC on the requested assessment <strong>of</strong> how recent experience at Fukushima<br />

<strong>and</strong> lessons learned so far may be applied to address any potential safety issues at the<br />

proposed <strong>Barakah</strong> Nuclear Power Plants. FANR requested:<br />

1. An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the response <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barakah</strong> <strong>Units</strong> 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Barakah</strong> site when<br />

facing a set <strong>of</strong> extreme situations.<br />

2. A verification <strong>of</strong> the preventive <strong>and</strong> mitigation measures selected in accordance with the<br />

defence <strong>and</strong> depth approach: initiating events, consequential loss <strong>of</strong> safety functions,<br />

severe accident management<br />

ENEC submitted a report entitled “<strong>Safety</strong> Assessment <strong>Report</strong> for Braka Nuclear Power<br />

Plants (Lessons Learned from Fukushima Accident),” through [Letter No. ENA/FANR/11/<br />

0356L/LNP] on 30 December 2011, describing proposed design <strong>and</strong> mitigation measures to<br />

improve the robustness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Barakah</strong> facility against extreme events. ENEC also provided<br />

a subsequent supplement on 30 January 2012, describing the relation <strong>of</strong> the proposed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!