FICON Express2 Channel Performance Version 1.0 - IBM
FICON Express2 Channel Performance Version 1.0 - IBM
FICON Express2 Channel Performance Version 1.0 - IBM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>FICON</strong> <strong>Express2</strong> <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Version</strong> <strong>1.0</strong><br />
Page 8<br />
time + CONN time. Since each I/O only transfers 4K bytes of data, CONN time is the smaller<br />
of the two components and remains relatively constant from low I/O rates to high I/O rates.<br />
On the other hand, PEND time grows as the FPU% grows. If we had used a point-to-point<br />
configuration to do this measurement and if the CU port had less capability than the new<br />
<strong>FICON</strong> <strong>Express2</strong> channel, then the PEND time would have grown faster as a function of the<br />
CU port processor utilization and we would not have been able to push the channel to its<br />
maximum capability.<br />
response time components for 4K read<br />
hits...4K bytes/io, 100% cu cache hit ratio<br />
<strong>FICON</strong> processor utilization<br />
10% FPU<br />
20% FPU<br />
30% FPU<br />
40% FPU<br />
50% FPU<br />
60% FPU<br />
70% FPU<br />
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />
response times in ms<br />
Figure 6<br />
pend<br />
conn<br />
Figure 7 shows the response time components for a more realistic version of an online<br />
transaction processing workload with a mix of reads and writes and a 70 to 80% CU cache hit<br />
ratio. In this case disconnect time is the largest component of the total response time and the<br />
component that grows the most as the activity rate increases. PEND and CONNECT times<br />
are about equal up to the 60% FPU point. There is a more significant increase in total<br />
response time beyond the 50% FPU point than there was with the simpler 4K read<br />
benchmark.