(see DINI 2007, 2.5.1, 4.5.1). This also suggests (somewhat more obviously) that somekind of quality control has to be carried out before a digital objects is ingested into therepository.2.5.1 pedocs AdministrationAdministration: Negotiate Submission Agreementpedocs enters contracts with two different kinds of depositors – individual authors (ortheir representatives), and publishers who agree to the publication of previously publishedtitles (predominantly out of print monographs and journals), often in combination with acommitment of pedocs to digitizing the material to be (re-)published. Thus, two differentkinds of contracts exist – an author agreement and contracts/deposit agreements withpublishers – specifying maintenance, access, and withdrawal of submitted documents. Asoutlined above, in the future authors will have to accept the author agreement via a doubleopt-in email procedure. 147 With the agreement, authors will transfer all rights necessary forlong-term preservation through the DNB and the right to publish their work openlyaccessible via pedocs to DIPF.Administration: Establish Standards and PoliciesAs required by the criteria catalogs considered here, pedocs has defined its policies,collection and preservation objectives as well as general goals in a policy document(pedocs Guidelines) which also fulfills the purpose of a mission statement. The policy notonly specifies collection guidelines and principles but also demonstrates pedocs'commitment to preserving the digital objects accepted into the repository for the long termin cooperation with the DNB. The policy outlines selection criteria, taking into accountcontent and form of documents, the document type (among others pedocs excludeswebsites, legal texts, user manuals, lecture materials such as PowerPoint slides orhandouts, advertising material, and leaflets from its collection), as well as <strong>file</strong> format. Asthe policy states clearly, pedocsaims to provide documents on a long-term basis, and it collaborates with the German NationalLibrary in order to achieve a long-term storage of its documents [...]. Each text is assigned anindividual address (URL), allowing for immediate access. Each document is furthermoreassigned a Persistent Identifier (URN) for its long-term, global and unambiguous referencing,independent from location. Texts and their descriptions are registered with the German NationalLibrary for long-term archiving, where they are catalogued and permanently archived. Theseprocedures are irreversible once they have been completed. 148 (pedocs Guidelines)The designated community is defined in the pedocs policy, albeit somewhat implicitlyand in a very general fashion. Thus, it is stated in section I:147 Currently, work is carried out to implement a new metadata field which will make it possible to link arecord and a document with a certain author agreement. Thus, if one author agreement is modified orreplaced, it becomes possible to trace for which objects in the repository a given agreement is valid.148 The policy states clearly that publications cannot be deleted once the publication process is completed.However, a record can be suppressed from showing up in the database in exceptional cases as laid downin §42 UrhG (see http://bundesrecht.juris.de/urhg/__42.html).62
pedocs is a scholarly open access document server for scientifically relevant publications in thefield of educational research and educational science [...]. pedocs offers authors in thedisciplines of educational science and education as well as related domains an organisationaland technical framework for publishing scientifically relevant documents in electronic form.(pedocs Guidelines)Certainly, the authors mentioned constitute one major portion of the designatedcommunity of pedocs, as often producers will also be users of the service. However, itwould be desirable to have more detailed information about the community/communitiesfor whose use pedocs is primarily intended – now and in the future. At this point in time itmight seem comparably clear at whom the services offered by pedocs are addressed andwhat the knowledge base of the designated community or communities is, it will becomemore difficult in the future to determine the knowledge base available to a designatedcommunity not precisely defined. In fact, the policy of FIS Bildung is somewhat moreprecise here by stating that its services are addressed at both educational research andtraining, as well as at educational practice (see FIS Bildung Policy). 149Although the pedocs policy is frequently reviewed and adapted, there are currently nomechanisms or policies governing this review process.Significant properties: In that it is crucial in long-term preservation to define anobject's (or object class's) significant properties, both the nestor and TRAC criteria catalogrequire the repository to identify these properties. This definition has not yet beencompleted for pedocs. Currently the policy only states that the content of the documentssubmitted and published will be preserved, but that this might not be possible for thelayout (see pedocs Guidelines, Section VII), thus indicating that content is consideredmore important than appearance/rendering. In the future, a more detailed list of significantproperties to be preserved for different document types will be added.Administration: Audit SubmissionIn order to ascertain that the <strong>file</strong>s published in pedocs adhere to the criteria outlinedin the policy, submissions are subject to both intellectual and automatic control. Asoutlined above, JHOVE is used to identify and validate <strong>file</strong> format. In addition, therepository staff determine by means of intellectual control whether documents areappropriate for publication in pedocs with regard to form, content, and quality (in particularalso quality of metadata). The completeness of the Submission Information Packages tobe stored on the server as (pre-)AIPs is primarily checked and guaranteed by the software– thus, for example, a record cannot be saved without having filled in metadata in therequired fields; a URN is added automatically so that published records will always have aURN.2.5.2 JUWEL AdministrationAdministration: Negotiate Submission Agreement149 http://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/fis_policy_e.html – 11.10.2009.63
- Page 6:
AbstractTaking its cue from the inc
- Page 13:
and benefit from the development an
- Page 18 and 19: German repositories have already be
- Page 20 and 21: [t]he Open Archival Information Sys
- Page 22 and 23: Thus it seems highly recommendable
- Page 24 and 25: actively pursuing the long-term pre
- Page 26 and 27: Like pedocs, the repository is not
- Page 28 and 29: application for a project grant was
- Page 30 and 31: generating an Archival Information
- Page 32 and 33: Integrity can be defined as “comp
- Page 34 and 35: It is with this step that the metad
- Page 36 and 37: documents submitted to the reposito
- Page 38 and 39: [t]he majority of OCR software supp
- Page 40 and 41: One of the shortcomings of the soft
- Page 42 and 43: set of shared metadata which is the
- Page 44 and 45: document, and that hence the docume
- Page 46: Structural metadata: In DSpace it i
- Page 49 and 50: dc.description.provenancedc.descrip
- Page 51 and 52: Für die Langzeitverfügbarkeit der
- Page 53 and 54: ecord for a title; although a workf
- Page 55 and 56: Source (where applicable)Publicatio
- Page 57 and 58: checksums. In particular, TRAC requ
- Page 59 and 60: checksums are currently not checked
- Page 61 and 62: 2.4.2 JUWEL Data ManagementThe stru
- Page 63 and 64: Before any SIPs are accepted, the r
- Page 65: guarantee that documents are “arc
- Page 69 and 70: formats. 151 Although the possible
- Page 71 and 72: While the preferred file format is
- Page 73 and 74: from nestor criterion 8, making it
- Page 75 and 76: preserved for the long term, will h
- Page 77 and 78: It seems that of all three reposito
- Page 79 and 80: associated with them, or has define
- Page 81 and 82: versioning functionality which allo
- Page 83 and 84: communication channels, responsibil
- Page 85 and 86: Works CitedAllinson, Julie (2006):
- Page 87 and 88: DSpace Homepage. http://www.dspace.
- Page 89 and 90: Lynch, Clifford A. (2000): Authenti
- Page 91 and 92: in the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Uni
- Page 93 and 94: Ingestnestor TRAC DINIReceive Submi
- Page 95 and 96: Archival Storagenestor TRAC DINIRec
- Page 97 and 98: Archival Information Update10.4 Das
- Page 99 and 100: Preservation PlanningnestorMonitor