Download (PDF, 9MB, Not barrier-free file.) - Nestor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ROAR: Registry of Open Access Repositories. http://roar.eprints.org/. Last accessed on01.11.2009.Rothenberg, Jeff (1999): Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Information.http://www.clir.org/pubs/archives/ensuring.pdf. Last updated on 22.02.1999. Last accessed on29.10.2009.Rusbridge, Chris (2009a): Repositories and Preservation. 23 February 2009. In: Rusbridge, Chris:Digital Curation Blog. Blog inspired by the Digital Curation Centre to discuss issues relating tothe curation and long term preservation of digital science and research data.http://digitalcuration.blogspot.com/2009/02/repositories-and-preservation.html. Last accessedon 29.10.2009.Rusbridge, Chris (2009b): Repository Preservation Revisited. 9 March 2009. In: Rusbridge, Chris:Digital Curation Blog. Blog inspired by the Digital Curation Centre to discuss issues relating tothe curation and long term preservation of digital science and research data.http://digitalcuration.blogspot.com/2009/03/repository-preservation-revisited.html. Last accessedon 29.10.2009.Salo, Dorothea (2007): Inkeeper at the Roach Motel. (Postprint). Also published in: Library Trends57.2(2008). http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/22088. Last accessed on 29.10.2009.Scholze, Frank; Summann, Friedrich (2009): Forschungsinformationen und Open AccessRepository-Systeme. In: Wissenschaftsmanagement, 15.3(2009): 41-42.Siermann, Barbara (2008): Long-term preservation for institutional repositories. In: Weenink, Kasja;Waaijers, Leo; van Godtsenhoven, Karen (Ed.): A DRIVER’s Guide to European Repositories.Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press:153-184. http://dare.uva.nl/aup/en/record/260224.Last accessed on 29.10.2009.Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR). http://www.ssoar.info/. Last accessed on03.11.2009.Steinhart, Gail; Dietrich, Dianne; Green, Anne (2009): Establishing Trust in a Chain of Preservation.The TRAC Checklist Applied to a Data Staging Repository (DataStaR). In: D-Lib Magazine,15.9/10(2009). doi:10.1045/september2009-steinhart. Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Steinke, Tobias (2006): Universal Object Format. An Archiving and Exchange Format for DigitalObjects. http://kopal.langzeitarchivierung.de/downloads/kopal_Universal_Object_Format.pdf.Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Steinke, Tobias (2008): Erfahrungen mit kopal und digitaler Langzeitarchivierung. Vortrag imRahmen des 97. Deutschen Bibliothekartags, Mannheim. http://www.opus-bayern.de/bibinfo/volltexte/2008/615/.Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Stone, Larry (2008): BitstreamFormat Renovation. DSpace Gets Real Technical Metadata.Presentation given at Open Repositories Conference 2008. Southampton, UK.http://wiki.dspace.org/static_files/a/a3/BSF-or08.pdf. Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Tanner, Simon; Muñoz, Trevor; Ros, Pich Hemy (2009): Measuring Mass Text Digitization Qualityand Usefulness. Lessons Learned from Assessing the OCR Accuracy of the British Library's19th Century Online Newspaper Archive. In: D-Lib Magazine, 15.7/8(2009).doi:10.1045/july2009-munoz. Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Tansley, Robert et al. (2006): DSpace 1.4.1. beta 1 System Documentation.http://wiki.dspace.org/static_files/b/be/DSpaceStandard141beta1.pdf. Last accessed on02.11.2009.Thibodeau, Kenneth (2007): If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository. In:Journal of Digital Information, Jg. 8, H. 2. http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/197/174. Lastaccessed on 29.10.2009.Universität Stuttgart (2006): OPUS Dokumentation. http://elib.unistuttgart.de/opus/doku/dokumentation.php,zuletzt aktualisiert am 03.02.2006. Last accessed on03.11.2009.University of Nottingham: SHERPA/RoMEO. Publisher Copyright Policies and Self-Archiving.http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/. Last accessed on 03.11.2009.van der Graaf, Maurits; van Eijndhoven, Kwame (2008): The European Repository Landscape.Inventory Study into the Present Type and Level of OAI-Compliant Digital Repository Activities86
in the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://dare.uva.nl/aup/en/record/260225.Last accessed on 29.10.2009.Weenink, Kasja; Waaijers, Leo; van Godtsenhoven, Karen (Ed.) (2008): A DRIVER's Guide toEuropean Repositories : Five studies of important Digital Repository-Related Issues and GoodPractices. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://dare.uva.nl/aup/en/record/260224.Last accessed on 02.11.2009.Wilson, Andrew (2007): Significant Properties Report. InSPECT Work Package 2.2, v.2.http://www.significantproperties.org.uk/documents/wp22_significant_properties.pdf. Lastaccessed on 02.11.2009.Wilson, Andrew (2009): Letter to the Editor. Authentic Digital Objects. In: International Journal ofDigital Curation, 4.2(2009): 4-7. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/113/100. Lastaccessed on 16.10.2009.Winkler, Marco (2008): Langzeitarchivierung von Online-Publikationen digitaler Repositorien.Untersuchung am Beispiel der Publikationssoftware OPUS. Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung desakademischen Grades Diplom-Dokumentar (FH). Fachhochschule Potsdam, FachbereichInformationswissenschaften. Unpublished.87
Page 6:
AbstractTaking its cue from the inc
Page 13:
and benefit from the development an
Page 18 and 19:
German repositories have already be
Page 20 and 21:
[t]he Open Archival Information Sys
Page 22 and 23:
Thus it seems highly recommendable
Page 24 and 25:
actively pursuing the long-term pre
Page 26 and 27:
Like pedocs, the repository is not
Page 28 and 29:
application for a project grant was
Page 30 and 31:
generating an Archival Information
Page 32 and 33:
Integrity can be defined as “comp
Page 34 and 35:
It is with this step that the metad
Page 36 and 37:
documents submitted to the reposito
Page 38 and 39:
[t]he majority of OCR software supp
Page 40 and 41: One of the shortcomings of the soft
Page 42 and 43: set of shared metadata which is the
Page 44 and 45: document, and that hence the docume
Page 46: Structural metadata: In DSpace it i
Page 49 and 50: dc.description.provenancedc.descrip
Page 51 and 52: Für die Langzeitverfügbarkeit der
Page 53 and 54: ecord for a title; although a workf
Page 55 and 56: Source (where applicable)Publicatio
Page 57 and 58: checksums. In particular, TRAC requ
Page 59 and 60: checksums are currently not checked
Page 61 and 62: 2.4.2 JUWEL Data ManagementThe stru
Page 63 and 64: Before any SIPs are accepted, the r
Page 65 and 66: guarantee that documents are “arc
Page 67 and 68: pedocs is a scholarly open access d
Page 69 and 70: formats. 151 Although the possible
Page 71 and 72: While the preferred file format is
Page 73 and 74: from nestor criterion 8, making it
Page 75 and 76: preserved for the long term, will h
Page 77 and 78: It seems that of all three reposito
Page 79 and 80: associated with them, or has define
Page 81 and 82: versioning functionality which allo
Page 83 and 84: communication channels, responsibil
Page 85 and 86: Works CitedAllinson, Julie (2006):
Page 87 and 88: DSpace Homepage. http://www.dspace.
Page 89: Lynch, Clifford A. (2000): Authenti
Page 93 and 94: Ingestnestor TRAC DINIReceive Submi
Page 95 and 96: Archival Storagenestor TRAC DINIRec
Page 97 and 98: Archival Information Update10.4 Das
Page 99 and 100: Preservation PlanningnestorMonitor
show all

Download (PDF, 9MB, Not barrier-free file.) - Nestor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?