Site Development Guide - National Capital Planning Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Section 2Community Relationships&Planning ConceptsI N T E L L I G E N C E C O M M U N I T Y C A M P U S – B E T H E S D A
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CAMPUS – BETHESDASite Development Guide2.1 Community Planning PerspectivesThe ICC-B site is located in the Glen Echo area of Bethesda in Montgomery County. This is in Area 1 ofthree primary community based planning areas in the County as shown in Figure 2.1. Master plans forthis area acknowledge the established nature of the land uses, identification of core central businessdistricts, commercial centers and residential neighborhoods which are consistent with the proposeddevelopment. A copy of the current Montgomery County Master Plan for this area of Bethesda isincluded in Appendix D, along with regional economic development data for further reference duringsite planning activities..Key Issue:Bethesda has a well educated and wealthy populace when compared to national statistics, with 79%of the population possessing bachelors’ degrees and 49% having graduate or professional degrees.This translates to a median family income of $130,206, and per capita income of $58,479 accordingto the 2000 census. This is comparable to the surrounding communities of Potomac and ChevyChase, MD, and Great Falls and McLean, VA. The proposed ICC-B development will support similareconomic and social demographics, enhancing the economic vitality of the region.Figure 2.1: Community Planning Areas around the ICC-B SitePlanning) Commission, M-NCPPC, (Image Source Maryland-National Capital Park andSection 2: Page 1 of 8
Page 1: Site Development Guide4600 Sangamor
Page 4: INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CAMPUS - BET
Page 7 and 8: INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CAMPUS - BET
Page 13: INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CAMPUS - BET
Page 23 and 24: Section 3Master Site Plan&Building
Page 33 and 34: Section 4Transportation PlanningI N
Page 42 and 43: Section 5Architectural Concepts&Ins
Page 50 and 51: Section 6Strategic Execution PlanI
Page 54 and 55: Appendix AICC-B Property DeedLOYALT
Page 124:
Appendix BICC-B Covenants and Easem
Page 128:
Deed DescriptionU.S. Government Pro
Page 192 and 193:
GLEN ECHO HEIGHTS CITIZENS ASSOCIAT
Page 194 and 195:
The status of the property between
Page 196 and 197:
2 Planning Board Draft 2009-2011 Gr
Page 198 and 199:
contentsexecutive summary 5directio
Page 200 and 201:
The Growth Policy originated during
Page 202 and 203:
housing affordabilityMaking it more
Page 204 and 205:
Summary of Proposed ChangesCategory
Page 206 and 207:
conclusionThe Growth Policy needs t
Page 208 and 209:
new variables for growing smart•
Page 210 and 211:
Developable land is a scarce resour
Page 212 and 213:
land typologiesestablished neighbor
Page 214 and 215:
income levelschange in median house
Page 216 and 217:
change in unit typesSince 1990, the
Page 218 and 219:
diversity and designRecent developm
Page 220 and 221:
Household population byage and sex2
Page 222 and 223:
zoningThe current revision of the z
Page 224 and 225:
LATR/PAMR guidelinesPriority1Mitiga
Page 226 and 227:
Year 2013 PAMR chart with “symmet
Page 228 and 229:
FY2010 school test results at 105 p
Page 230 and 231:
total vehicle miles travled (vmt) o
Page 232 and 233:
The Smart Growth Criteria alternate
Page 234 and 235:
PAMR symmetrical LOS standards rela
Page 236 and 237:
3. Set the value of each vehicle tr
Page 238 and 239:
montgomery county urban areas44 Pla
Page 240 and 241:
The Gaithersburg West Master Plan f
Page 242 and 243:
threshold or a moratorium. The scho
Page 244 and 245:
F2. compact subdivision development
Page 246 and 247:
sustainablePlanning Board Draft2009
Page 248 and 249:
Labor Market CharacteristicsEmploym
Page 250 and 251:
Workforce DemographicsResident Work
Page 252 and 253:
Educational Attainment of County Re
Page 254 and 255:
LanguageEnglish is the primary lang
Page 256 and 257:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLANDMontgome
Page 258 and 259:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLANDSCHOOLS
Page 260 and 261:
Implementing a SuccessfulTMPTranspo
Page 262 and 263:
Section 1: Introduction & Overview1
Page 264 and 265:
PurposeThis handbook provides feder
Page 266 and 267:
Analyze scenarios that incorporate
Page 268 and 269:
1.2 OverviewWhat is a Transportatio
Page 270 and 271:
Implementing a TMPTo facilitate the
Page 272 and 273:
2.1 The Federal Government Role2The
Page 274 and 275:
The Roles andResponsibilities of Th
Page 276 and 277:
Federal Requirements& ResourcesClea
Page 278 and 279:
In 2007, the GSA announced an aggre
Page 280 and 281:
Before disaster strikes, agencies s
Page 282 and 283:
eimbursement of fees for a first-ti
Page 284 and 285:
Growth Policy, measures of impact a
Page 286 and 287:
Encourage proffers of TDMs and deve
Page 288 and 289:
This section of the handbook descri
Page 290 and 291:
• Congestion is reduced, since ea
Page 292 and 293:
wearing a helmet, watching out for
Page 294 and 295:
Parking ManagementParking managemen
Page 296 and 297:
Factors to be considered when imple
Page 298 and 299:
participating in a specific program
Page 300 and 301:
4.1 Initiating the ProgramThis sect
Page 302 and 303:
A deviation of this measure (useful
Page 304 and 305:
Identify Existing Transportation Pr
Page 306 and 307:
Other SourcesOther possible seconda
Page 308 and 309:
Step 3: Set TDM Goal• Set by Regu
Page 310 and 311:
• Identify the locations of the f
Page 312 and 313:
Bicycling/Walking• Provide maps i
Page 314 and 315:
• Evaluate the program at interim
Page 316 and 317:
PublicityP LACEspecial events such
Page 318 and 319:
4.4 Monitoring & EvaluationWhat Is
Page 320 and 321:
Selecting the SampleRespondents are
Page 322:
Record of Decisionfor theImplementa
Page 362 and 363:
Tom FitzgeraldFrom:Sent:To:Subject:
Page 364 and 365:
M: 35-139 Guard Houses, National Im
Page 366 and 367:
Standards andGuidelines forArchitec
Page 368 and 369:
PrefaceThe Maryland Historical Trus
Page 370 and 371:
PersonnelOffice of Research, Survey
Page 372 and 373:
IIntroductionA Comprehensive Refere
Page 374 and 375:
architecture or is a state-licensed
Page 376 and 377:
II Architectural andHistorical Inve
Page 378 and 379:
Listing in the National Registerof
Page 380 and 381:
The Trust’s Office of Preservatio
Page 382 and 383:
III Research DesignsWorking with th
Page 384 and 385:
for their development potential, ho
Page 386 and 387:
IVGuidelines forCompleting theMaryl
Page 388 and 389:
Intensive level of survey is requir
Page 390 and 391:
inclusive street address numbers fo
Page 392 and 393:
Summarize the physical setting and
Page 394 and 395:
- Architectural styles or periods r
Page 396 and 397:
Transportation The process and tech
Page 398 and 399:
Statement of Significance: Provide
Page 400 and 401:
in Section 8. Using the same exampl
Page 402 and 403:
with many pencils, however, soft gr
Page 404 and 405:
esource is complex, prepare measure
Page 406 and 407:
V Final Survey ReportHistoric resou
Page 408 and 409:
made significant contributions to t
Page 410 and 411:
VI Compliance ReportsThe preceding
Page 412 and 413:
● Give the dates when background
Page 414 and 415:
architectural and historic properti
Page 416 and 417:
Additional technical information fo
Page 418 and 419:
aries are vital to an understanding
Page 420 and 421:
VIIAccessioningProceduresWritten an
Page 422 and 423:
Final Survey ReportsFinal survey re
Page 424 and 425:
VIIISurvey andPlanningMaterialsTech
Page 426:
__________________, et. al., Where
Page 429 and 430:
Notes
Page 431:
Maryland Historical TrustMaryland D
Page 434 and 435:
MHT Project Review StaffPage 2 of 3
Page 436 and 437:
Maryland Historical TrustState and
Page 438 and 439:
Guidelines and Resources for Compli
Page 440 and 441:
Guidelines and Resources for Compli
Page 442 and 443:
Appendix ASelected “Field Guides
Page 444 and 445:
Appendix CSelected Publications abo
Page 446 and 447:
Appendix DAttachments to the Determ
Page 448 and 449:
Photo Log: A photo log in Microsoft
Page 450 and 451:
Appendix FInstructions for Completi
Page 452 and 453:
Property and Project DataField Name
Page 454 and 455:
Preparer’s RecommendationField Na
Page 456 and 457:
JustificationField NameDescriptionD
Page 458 and 459:
• If insufficient information is
Page 460:
Appendix INational Register Criteri
Page 463 and 464:
PREFACEIn 1981, the Maryland Histor
Page 465 and 466:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPREFACE .... iiACK
Page 467 and 468:
VII. REPORTS TS AND DOCUMENTATIONTI
Page 469 and 470:
I. INTRODUCTIONA. AuthorityThe Mary
Page 471 and 472:
Figure 1.Flow chart of a government
Page 473 and 474:
D. DefinitionsThis Introduction clo
Page 475 and 476:
II. IDENTIFICATION TION (PHASE I)A.
Page 477 and 478:
ØØØØcompilations of environment
Page 479 and 480:
Numerous other sources of informati
Page 481 and 482:
example, Kavanagh [1982]). Furtherm
Page 483 and 484:
F. ReportingFollowing the analysis
Page 485 and 486:
informant interviews, and collectio
Page 487 and 488:
Figure 3.Some basic lithic analysis
Page 489 and 490:
(1984), Glassow (1977; 1985), King
Page 491 and 492:
C. Sources of Technical Information
Page 493 and 494:
Figure 4.Example of site avoidance
Page 495 and 496:
conclusion. The decision for destru
Page 497 and 498:
3. Field Studies In order to achiev
Page 499 and 500:
Figure 6.Recordation of structural
Page 501 and 502:
H. Planning for Unexpected Discover
Page 503 and 504:
Figure 7.Locations of former urban
Page 505 and 506:
5. Reporting Requirementsements Res
Page 507 and 508:
a standing historic property. Recom
Page 509 and 510:
Code of Maryland, and COMAR 05.08.0
Page 511 and 512:
A. GoalThe goal of the following mi
Page 513 and 514:
written record of historic time per
Page 515 and 516:
gesso since it is not long lasting
Page 517 and 518:
tation, as well as exhibit-quality
Page 519 and 520:
Ø b. All photographic documentatio
Page 521 and 522:
Ø b. For large ge collections (mor
Page 523 and 524:
Wider dissemination of the results
Page 525 and 526:
Ø modification (if needed) of the
Page 527 and 528:
2. Phase II Reports This section hi
Page 529 and 530:
VIII. SPECIAL PROVISIONSThis final
Page 531 and 532:
These provisions of Maryland law ar
Page 533 and 534:
guidance.D. Multidisciplinary Inves
Page 535 and 536:
REFERENCES CITEDAdvisory Council on
Page 537 and 538:
Moratto, Michael J., and Roger E. K
Page 539 and 540:
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF TECHNICAL INF
Page 541 and 542:
APPENDIX IMARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST
Page 543 and 544:
ARCHEOLOGY SITE & SURVEY REPORTSREV
Page 546 and 547:
APPENDIX IIINATIONAL ARCHEOLOGICAL
Page 548 and 549:
8. PUBLICATION TYPECircle the appro
Page 550 and 551:
“No resources” should be entere
Page 552 and 553:
APPENDIX A. AMERICAN ANTIQUITY FORM
Page 554 and 555:
Shepard, Eugene1965 Tecopa Burial C
Page 556 and 557:
Quilty, Kenneth, and Nina M. Versag
Page 558 and 559:
PRIRDSSBASCSSISTASTATTVAUMTAUNUNKUS
Page 560 and 561:
9. INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLISHER/PUBL
Page 562 and 563:
90 Oral History91 Subsurface Activi
Page 564:
I N T E L L I G E N C E C O M M U N
show all

Site Development Guide - National Capital Planning Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?