30.11.2012 Views

NASA Technical Paper 2256 - CAFE Foundation

NASA Technical Paper 2256 - CAFE Foundation

NASA Technical Paper 2256 - CAFE Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i<br />

7:<br />

region of the airfoil. Further observations of propeller slipstreams are made subse-<br />

quently for the Skyrocket II and T-34C airplanes.<br />

Gates Lear_et Model 28/29 Longhorn.- Transition locations are shown in figure 32 ....<br />

and are listed in table 2 for the wing and winglet at M = 0.7, h d = 16 500 it,<br />

C L = 0.12, and R = 3.08 × 106 ft -I. This test altitude was chosen to provide a<br />

static temperature conducive to rapid sublimation of the chemicals. It isnot repre-<br />

sentative of cruise conditions. The resulting Reynolds number was about 400 percent<br />

higher _an typical cruise values; in this sense, the results of these experiments<br />

are conservative.<br />

Transition on the wing (fig. 32(a)) was (x/c) t = 40 to 45 percent. In the<br />

figure, several turbulent wedges are seen which terminate in the natural transition<br />

location noted. Most of the turbulent wedges were attributed to large chemical par-<br />

ticles which adhered to the wing surface during application.<br />

The most rearward natural transition on the winglet (fig. 32(b)) was<br />

(x/c) t = 55 percent. Many turbulent wedges were observed emanating from chemical<br />

particles adhering to the surface as well as from surface irregularities at the junc-<br />

ture between the winglet leading edge and the surface skin on the suction (inner)<br />

side. Spanwise and chordwise rows of flush-countersunk structural screwheads initi-<br />

ated the transition.<br />

The largest wave measured on the wing in the laminar region was h _ 0.002 in.<br />

with k = 2.0 in. (See appendix.) For the test condition with c = 6.58 it, the<br />

maximum allowable single wave height, as determined by using the equation in the<br />

appendix, is 0.008 in. for k = 2.0 in. Thus, the empirically determined maximum<br />

allowable wave height was not exceeded by waviness existing on the-wing in the lami-<br />

nar region. On the lower span of the winglet, the measured height of an aft-facing<br />

step near the leading edge exceeded the allowable height, and the premature transi-<br />

tion observed on that portion of the winglet cad bg_attributed to this step. (See<br />

fig. 32(b).)<br />

NO spanwise contamination due to the leading-edge wing sweep A. of 17 ° was<br />

le<br />

observed. The maximum value of attachment-line momentum thickness Reynolds number<br />

R e at the test condition was 74.<br />

Cessna P-210 Centurion.- Transition locations are shown in figure 33 and<br />

are listed in table 2 for the wing upper and lower_-surfaces and the horizontal_<br />

stabilizer for V = 139 to 154 knots, R 1.34 x 106 to 1.48 x 106 ft -I, and<br />

C L = 0,36 to 0.32 c. Observations on the variation of the upper surface transition<br />

locations with angle of attack_are given in the following table:<br />

Vc, knots<br />

1 39<br />

149<br />

154<br />

C L<br />

0.35<br />

.28<br />

.26<br />

R, ft "I<br />

1.34 × 106<br />

1.43 × 106<br />

1.48 × 106<br />

(X/C)t, percen£<br />

Figure 33(a) shows (x/c) t = 29 percent at V c = 149 knots. On the lower part<br />

of this figure, transition of (x/c) t = 44 percent at V c = 154 knots is faintly<br />

5<br />

29<br />

44<br />

®

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!