quality that can enhance drought tolerance are being practiced in east and southern Africa(Savory, 1999).Livestock production supports food security and the provision of employment, income, food,fuel, farm power and a variety of merchandise goods. <strong>The</strong> bulk of animal-source foodavailable to households in West Africa is derived from ruminant livestock, which ispredominantly produced by pastoralists. A significant proportion of these pastoralists employ(opportunistic) migratory production strategies. For most African pastoralists, mobility is still akey element of production strategy. Pastoralism as a livelihood activity is practiced in avariety of ways as a response to the dictates of the immediate environment and availableresources. A greater proportion of the total ruminant population of the region is producedunder this system.Policies, agreements, treaties and legal texts relating to pastoralists in West Africa areemerging. In the Sahel countries, in particular, legal texts and pastoral codes were adoptedrecently and applied with varying degrees of success. Such laws – which can be seen inBurkina Faso, Mali, Mauritania and Niger, where it is still under development – are related tothe access, durable and peaceful use of common pastoral resources. Examples ofpastoralists laws include:National legal texts having milked with the practice of the pastoralbreeding, animal health and land rural;Agreements or conventions on transhumance; andMedical zoo agreements or conventions regarding the health of animalsthat cross borders.3.2.3 Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Eradication Campaign(PATTEC)<strong>The</strong> prevalence of trypanosomiasis makes it both difficult and uneconomical to raise productivelivestock breeds because they are highly susceptible to the disease. While mixed farming iscommonly practised in other parts of the world, where tsetse flies are absent, in most of Sub-SaharanAfrica, livestock production is separated from crop production. In addition, avoidance of tsetseinfestedareas causes people and livestock to crowd into the few, often environmentally fragile,tsetse-free areas available.<strong>The</strong> burden of living with trypanosomiasis among livestock-keepers or small-scale mixed farmers aremultiple and diverse, because of the multiple functions and value of livestock in Africa's rurallivelihood systems. This includes among other the loss of draught power, the inability of liivestock tograze in certain areas and for people to have access to arable land and water in an area coveringclose of 9 millions km².During the Summit the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) held in Togo, in July 2000, the AfricanHeads of State and Government adopted a decision (AHG/Dec. 156 (XXXVI) urging Member Statesto act collectively and embark on a Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Eradication Campaign,to eliminate the disease and its vectors from Africa, once and for all. <strong>The</strong> decision to embark on thePATTEC initiative not only underscored the seriousness and significance, which AfricanGovernments attach to the tsetse and trypanosomiasis problem, but it also defines their readinessand willingness to assume the primary responsibility of implementing the objectives of the decision.<strong>The</strong> concerted implementation of PATTEC initiative will contribute to the extension of millions ofhectares for sustainable land and water management. Six countries 5Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana,Kenya, Mali and Uganda have been engaged since 2005 through a financial support of the AfDBamounting to USD 70 millions for the creation of tsetse and trypanosomiasis free areas (240 000km²) in East and West Africa in the first phase of the Programme. Further, the AfDB and otherpartners (BADEA, WHO, FIND, AIEA, among others) have committed to support the programme byfunding bankable projects of eligible countries in the coming years.28
3.2.4 Agroforestry and forestryAgroforestry and soil fertility improvement – involving the growth of woody perennials (trees,shrubs, palms, bamboos, etc) on the same plot of land used for agricultural crops and/orlivestock in ways that permit significant economic and ecological interactions between thewoody and non-woody components. Within Africa, the World Agroforestry Centre 10 has beeninstrumental in documenting and promoting indigenous and derived (i.e. research station)agroforestry systems for soil fertility improvement.Forestry – afforestation and reforestation involves planting trees for shelterbelts, windbreaksand woodlots to increase fuel wood, timber and fodder 11 . Tree planting has been recognisedfor its capacity to sequester carbon while conserving soil and water quality and quantity. <strong>The</strong>Green Belt Movement in Kenya, well known for tree planting, includes indigenous trees inforest catchment areas and riparian reserves to preserve local biological diversity.Programmes such as Farm Africa in Tanzania and Ethiopia promote local community-basedforest management for conserving and enhancing forest resources while reducing forestlosses and illegal logging 12 .West Africa is home to several success stories, including the Sahel vert programmeconducted in the Sahel countries during the 1970s and 1980s, which employed localarrangements to control the use of trees (ICRAF, March 2008). As a result, in Niger alone,regeneration is close to 30 million hectares. <strong>The</strong> programme transferred use andmanagement of agro forests from the government to rural populations and a concept of―contracts of cultures‖ in protected areas was promoted. Users were encouraged to planttrees for producing wood for buildings, firewood and for ecological purposes, having beenfirst sensitised about protected species and their sustainability. A monitoring system was putin place to ensure sustainability.3.2.5 Water and irrigation management<strong>The</strong>re have been recent successful project investments in small-scale community managedirrigation. Examples include: (i) small-scale run-of-the-river rice schemes developed at lowcost ($1,070/ha) under the Tanzania Participatory Irrigation Development Project thatachieved a rate of return of 22 percent and increased farm incomes by 86 percent (IFAD,2007) and ii) the Ethiopia Social Rehabilitation and Development Fund, where communitybasedirrigation, supplied largely from earthen dams and river diversions, benefited some40,000 households. Visible improvement in the lives of villagers included increased purchaseof water pumps, milk cows and radios as well as regular schooling for children (World Bank,2002a).<strong>The</strong> Sahel countries successfully tested strategies of valorisation of water resources. Smallfamily irrigation was installed on 0.25 hectare lots in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, as well asa number of other countries of the CILSS. Giving poor families partial or total control of waterhelped increase their farming productivity and access to basic food products.In West Africa, a common policy for water has been initiated by ECOWAS with the support ofthe CILSS and the UEMOA. This policy allow for an integrated management of the resource,its diversified and equitable use and protection. Under the World Coalition on Water in theSahel initiative, CILSS countries aim to combine efforts to combat hunger and povertythrough water resource management. <strong>The</strong> initiative aims to develop a common framework tostimulate and enhance national and regional plans.10 Formerly known as the International Council for Agroforestry Research (ICRAF), with headquarters in Nairobi Kenya11 Afforestation Project in Kano and Jigawa States, Nigeria, UNEP Success Story,http://www.unep.org/desertification/successstories/8.htm12 Farm Africa http://www.farmafrica.org.uk/ and Green Belt Movement, Kenya http://www.greenbeltmovement.org/29
- Page 3 and 4: Lead TeamBWALYA Martin, NEPAD Secre
- Page 5 and 6: 3.2.4 Water and irrigation manageme
- Page 8 and 9: Executive SummaryThe Framework for
- Page 10 and 11: Focus on implementationThe heart of
- Page 12 and 13: performance of the agricultural sec
- Page 14 and 15: financial resources; and (v) provid
- Page 16 and 17: and regional development. By contra
- Page 18 and 19: Box 2: Summary of Land Degradation
- Page 20 and 21: Source: Douglas, 1994Apart from ine
- Page 22 and 23: Map 4: Extent of irrigation develop
- Page 24 and 25: Surface water is overwhelmingly the
- Page 26 and 27: 2.4 Crop production, livestock, fis
- Page 28 and 29: Policy, institutional and governanc
- Page 30 and 31: private sector and civil society ag
- Page 32 and 33: substantially. Overall, on a region
- Page 34 and 35: disciplinary experts required to so
- Page 36 and 37: 3.1.4 Landscape and ecosystem manag
- Page 40 and 41: Box 5: Successful public large-scal
- Page 42 and 43: With considerable experience to dra
- Page 44 and 45: productivity has proved comparable
- Page 46 and 47: Issues related to the formulation a
- Page 48 and 49: Promotion market oriented AWM on a
- Page 50 and 51: TANZANIA: In Tanzania, water harves
- Page 52 and 53: improvement (e.g. planting, natural
- Page 54 and 55: ased GHG emission reductions in dev
- Page 56 and 57: of tourism closer to home, the Keny
- Page 58 and 59: commercial bank in London (Reuters,
- Page 60 and 61: Building African-owned coalitions a
- Page 62 and 63: provide the incentive for those uti
- Page 64 and 65: High level indicators of performanc
- Page 66 and 67: productivity and the capacity to pr
- Page 68 and 69: Soil Nutrient LossLoss of High Valu
- Page 70 and 71: Table 5: Some Social Consequences o
- Page 72 and 73: 2005). Likewise, at the large-scale
- Page 74 and 75: Annex 3: Investment Performance and
- Page 76 and 77: Weaknesses in institutional capacit
- Page 78 and 79: Ecosystem assessment - so as to ide
- Page 80 and 81: Table 5: Mainstreaming and Up-Scali
- Page 82: identifying key gaps and improving
- Page 85 and 86: FAO. 2003b. Bruinsma, J. (ed.). 200