Issues related to the formulation and implementation of land policies. <strong>The</strong>re have been lowlevels of stakeholder and civil society involvement in policy formulation. Despite popular participationin some countries, the state has generally played the dominant role in driving and shaping land policyformulation. In addition, frequently inputs from stakeholders and civil society to land policydevelopment have been ignored or not fully considered. <strong>The</strong>re is also an inadequate human andinstitutional capacity to design and undertake policy development and subsequent implementation,thus, rendering many policies incapable of being implemented.Issues related to the provision for adequate budgetary allocations: In Africa, there is a failure tomake provision for adequate budgetary allocations to underwrite the cost of land policy developmentand implementation, including capacity gap assessments and medium- to long-term strategies andprogrammes to deal with capacity constraints.Box 7: Key issues/problems to which land policy must respondState sovereignty over landUnequal distribution of land resources – colonial legacyDualism in property systemsLand tenure securityEnhancing productivity issues in agricultureSustainable management of the environmentProtecting the commons, including managing pastoral land useImproving land rights security in urban and peri-urban areasAddressing gender biases in land relationsManaging the impact of HIV/AIDSRestructuring land administration systemsManaging land use in post conflict reconstructionManaging emerging issues regarding land such as global warming and climate change, bio fuels, food securityand environmental change, land for investment and foreign investmentManaging land policy development and implementation processes3.4.2.2 Agriculture Water Management policy issues<strong>The</strong>re is now a general consensus concerning need for national strategies to reform AgricultureWater Management (AWM) in Africa. <strong>The</strong> paper ―Investment in agricultural water for povertyreduction and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa‖ (June 2007) suggested ways in whichincreased investment in agricultural water management could make a sustainable contribution tofurther poverty reduction and growth. 14 This in particular through: «increased investments inagricultural water development and institutional reforms in accordance with the Maputo Declaration ofthe African Ministers of Agriculture, including reforms to macro-economic policies, legal frameworksand organizations for agricultural water». Some guiding principles for setting a framework forinvestments in sustainable AWM in Africa include:Need for national AWM strategies and action plans: that show how investment inagricultural water can best contribute to agricultural productivity growth and povertyreduction. <strong>The</strong> strategies should also analyze the various investment options, including: Increasing the productivity and profitability of existing irrigation schemes; Expanding or developing new viable large, medium, small, and micro-scale irrigationsystems (including systems based on water harvesting); Testing and dissemination of viable, farmer-financed in-field rainwater managementtechnologies as a low-cost alternative to irrigation; Developing sustainable supply chains for micro-scale irrigation and in-field rainwatermanagement equipment; and Investing in research on agricultural water management, both adaptive research atthe national and regional levels, and basic research at the regional level.14 <strong>The</strong> strategy was first presented in a workshop that was held in March 2007 in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. <strong>The</strong>workshop was attended by over 130 experts and managers from 32 African countries and development partners with the aimto promote Agricultural Water Development (AWD) and to revitalize interest in AWD in Sub-Saharan Africa.36
<strong>The</strong> new strategies should then be incorporated into wider sectoral strategies - foragriculture, rural development, and water. <strong>The</strong> whole should then be clearly reflectedin PRSPs or similar national development strategies.Investment in AWM must consider imperatives of Farm-level profitability, viability andsustainability and gender issues as well: AWM investments need to be economicallyviable, financially profitable, and socially and environmentally sustainable. Future designsand investment decisions including those for major infrastructure should be based solely onconsiderations of economic viability, farm level profitability, and sustainability. However,where ‗downstream‘ benefits can be quantified these should be taken into account in theanalysis. Similarly, where there are opportunities for multipurpose investments these shouldbe taken advantage of and accounted for in project costs and benefits. Poverty reduction andgender inclusion objectives of investments need to be clearly defined and demonstrablysupported by intended activities, inputs and outputs of projects.Women are stakeholders in agricultural water management and a poverty targetgroup. <strong>The</strong> impact of AWM on women is generally positive but there are specific problemsof participation and equity for women.Promoting institutional and policy reforms: New investments have to take on board thefundamental lesson of the past: that only the empowered farmer with a share in decisionmaking will invest and produce as expected. Thus, macro-economic and sectoral policies,legal frameworks and organizations need to be in place that define and deliver an efficientrole for government, promote private sector and farmer investment, empowerment and costsharing, and provide for efficient management of irrigation scheme.Thus, water investmentstrategies, and related agricultural water strategies, need to ensure that institutional aspectssuch as legal frameworks for land and water entitlements and for farmers‘ organizationsparticipation and empowerment are analyzed and constraints taken into consideration; inparticular the policy and institutional reforms and capacity building under which the changingrole of concerned government institutions and involvement of local actors will take place.Ensuring integrated Water Resources Management: it is necessary to ensure IWRM fromthe river basin level to the end users. Thus, as most rivers in Africa cover internationalboundaries, with the major basins having more than four riparian countries, cooperationamong concerned countries and shared strategic vision in common water resourcesmanagement is key element for a sustainable development. Given the predominant role ofagriculture as a water user, agricultural water investment plans need to be well articulatedwith the overall water resource planning and management process at country, sub-basin andbasin levels. For countries that have a high dependence ratio such as Mali, Ghana,Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Sudan and Chad, a Transboundary Integrated Water ResourcesManagement (TIWRM) approach for shared water resources should be the guiding principlein water allocation decisions.Ensuring effective and successful implementation: implementation needs to be efficientlydirected towards the bottom line of increasing farmers‘ incomes sustainably, andmanagement arrangements need to be determined on the basis of the most cost effectiveapproach.Adaptation to climate change: Climate change has become a global theme currentlyreceiving considerable discussion at the regional and international levels. <strong>The</strong> climatevariability and climate change agenda and the water development agendas cannot run inparallel or in isolation from one another. Strategy refinements are needed to bring the twocommunities much closer together.Based on the analysis above and lessons learned, AWM within <strong>CAADP</strong> will likely consist of any or acombination of the following broad areas of focus. However, one should keep in mind that differentcountries have different opportunities and constraints and the emphasis on one area of focus onanother will certainly differ:37
- Page 3 and 4: Lead TeamBWALYA Martin, NEPAD Secre
- Page 5 and 6: 3.2.4 Water and irrigation manageme
- Page 8 and 9: Executive SummaryThe Framework for
- Page 10 and 11: Focus on implementationThe heart of
- Page 12 and 13: performance of the agricultural sec
- Page 14 and 15: financial resources; and (v) provid
- Page 16 and 17: and regional development. By contra
- Page 18 and 19: Box 2: Summary of Land Degradation
- Page 20 and 21: Source: Douglas, 1994Apart from ine
- Page 22 and 23: Map 4: Extent of irrigation develop
- Page 24 and 25: Surface water is overwhelmingly the
- Page 26 and 27: 2.4 Crop production, livestock, fis
- Page 28 and 29: Policy, institutional and governanc
- Page 30 and 31: private sector and civil society ag
- Page 32 and 33: substantially. Overall, on a region
- Page 34 and 35: disciplinary experts required to so
- Page 36 and 37: 3.1.4 Landscape and ecosystem manag
- Page 38 and 39: quality that can enhance drought to
- Page 40 and 41: Box 5: Successful public large-scal
- Page 42 and 43: With considerable experience to dra
- Page 44 and 45: productivity has proved comparable
- Page 48 and 49: Promotion market oriented AWM on a
- Page 50 and 51: TANZANIA: In Tanzania, water harves
- Page 52 and 53: improvement (e.g. planting, natural
- Page 54 and 55: ased GHG emission reductions in dev
- Page 56 and 57: of tourism closer to home, the Keny
- Page 58 and 59: commercial bank in London (Reuters,
- Page 60 and 61: Building African-owned coalitions a
- Page 62 and 63: provide the incentive for those uti
- Page 64 and 65: High level indicators of performanc
- Page 66 and 67: productivity and the capacity to pr
- Page 68 and 69: Soil Nutrient LossLoss of High Valu
- Page 70 and 71: Table 5: Some Social Consequences o
- Page 72 and 73: 2005). Likewise, at the large-scale
- Page 74 and 75: Annex 3: Investment Performance and
- Page 76 and 77: Weaknesses in institutional capacit
- Page 78 and 79: Ecosystem assessment - so as to ide
- Page 80 and 81: Table 5: Mainstreaming and Up-Scali
- Page 82: identifying key gaps and improving
- Page 85 and 86: FAO. 2003b. Bruinsma, J. (ed.). 200