Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table - 12Distribution (%) of 6-11 months Children according to Feeding PracticesFeeding PracticesPercentn 50Foods generally included in home made complementary foods*Cereals & Millets 38.0Pulses 36.0Green Leafy Vegetables 28.0Other Vegetables 28.0Roots & Tubers 24.0Fruits 30.0Milk & milk products 30.0Eggs 6.0Meat & Chicken 4.0Fats & Oils 24.0Number of complementary feeds per dayMode of complementary feeding2 20.03 12.04 4.05 2.06-8 14.0Not yet started 48.0Mother with spoon 10.0Mother with hand 42.0Not yet started 48.0Supervision of complementary feeding by* Multiple responsesMother 52.0Not yet started 48.0Nutritional Status of
Table - 13Distribution (%) of 12-35 months Children according to FeedingPracticesFeeding PracticesPercentn 223Children currently Breast fed + complementary feeding 68.6Not breast fed 31.4Type of food currently being given*Cow/buffalo milk 75.8Formula milk 18.8Commercial baby food 23.3Home made semi-solids 95.5Home made solids 89.7Foods generally included in home made foods*Cereals & Millets 97.3Pulses & legumes 97.3Green Leafy Vegetables 93.3Other Vegetables 93.7Roots & Tubers 86.5Fruits 91.5Milk & milk products 86.1Eggs 26.0Flesh foods 17.5Fats & Oils 79.4* Multiple responses ( Contd….)Nutritional Status of
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTSPage No.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSPRO
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe express our sinc
Page 7 and 8: RESULTS AT GLANCE
Page 9 and 10: RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…2)MAJO
Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 13 and 14: About 67% of pregnant women had und
Page 15 and 16: 1. INTRODUCTIONIndia, in the past f
Page 17 and 18: The type and magnitude of undernutr
Page 19 and 20: were surveyed by selecting a random
Page 21 and 22: 4. RESULTS4.1 CoverageA total of 39
Page 23 and 24: 4.5 Maternal characteristics4.5.1 A
Page 25 and 26: 70%Fig.1 Distribution (%) of 0-11 m
Page 27 and 28: children reportedly had diarrhoea d
Page 29 and 30: 4.7 Nutritional status of children
Page 31 and 32: 120100Fig.6 Distance charts for Hei
Page 33 and 34: The overall prevalence of stunting
Page 35 and 36: Literacy status of fatherThe nutrit
Page 37 and 38: Fig.13 Prevalence (%) of Undernutri
Page 39 and 40: Type of houseThe prevalence of unde
Page 41 and 42: study, colostrum was given by major
Page 43 and 44: REFERENCES1. de Onis M, Blossner M,
Page 45 and 46: TABLES
Page 47 and 48: Table - 2Socio-economic Profile of
Page 49 and 50: Table - 3Physical facilities of the
Page 51 and 52: Table - 6Particulars of last pregna
Page 53 and 54: Table - 6 (Contd…)Particulars of
Page 55 and 56: Table - 8Distribution (%) of < 60 m
Page 57: Table - 11Distribution (%) of infan
Page 61 and 62: Table - 14Distribution (%) of mothe
Page 63 and 64: Table - 16Distribution (%) of mothe
Page 65 and 66: Table -18Distribution (%) of 12- 24
Page 67 and 68: Table - 20Distribution (%) of 12-59
Page 69 and 70: nTable -22Mean Height and weight of
Page 71 and 72: Table -24Distribution (%) of 0- 59
Page 73 and 74: Table -25 (Contd...)Distribution (%
show all

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?