Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RESULTS AT A GLANCEDISTRICT PROFILETotal population (2001 Census) 1083949Sex Ratio 901Population density (per sq km) 148Percent of Schedule caste 19.5Percent of Schedule Tribes 12.6Literacy status (%) 61.9Female literacy (%) 47.3SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICSHHs surveyed (n) 390Average Family size (n) 6.1Average per capita monthly income (Rs) 1125COMMUNITY (%)Scheduled Caste 18.2Scheduled Tribe 21.5TYPE OF FAMILY (%)Nuclear 52.8Extended Nuclear 10.5Joint 36.7LITERACY STATUS (%)Father 73.8Mother 53.1LAND HOLDING (% HHs)Land less Families 39.0Marginal Farmers 17.2Small Farmers 10.8Large Farmers 33.0(Contd… 2).Nutritional Status. of < 5 year Children Damoh Dt.- Madhya Pradesh
RESULTS AT A GLANCE (Contd…2)MAJOR OCCUPATION OF HOUSEHOLDPercentLabourers 43.1Cultivators 46.3Land Lords 0.0Artisans 0.5Service 4.9Business 4.4TYPE OF HOUSEKutcha 16.7Semi-Pucca 67.2Pucca 16.1SOURCE OF DRINKING WATEROpen well 27.4Tube well 44.4Tap 24.6HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY 92.1PRESENT AND USING SANITARY LATRINE 14.4IODINE CONTENT OF COOKING SALT0 ppm 57.7
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSPage No.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSPRO
Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe express our sinc
Page 7: RESULTS AT GLANCE
Page 11 and 12: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 13 and 14: About 67% of pregnant women had und
Page 15 and 16: 1. INTRODUCTIONIndia, in the past f
Page 17 and 18: The type and magnitude of undernutr
Page 19 and 20: were surveyed by selecting a random
Page 21 and 22: 4. RESULTS4.1 CoverageA total of 39
Page 23 and 24: 4.5 Maternal characteristics4.5.1 A
Page 25 and 26: 70%Fig.1 Distribution (%) of 0-11 m
Page 27 and 28: children reportedly had diarrhoea d
Page 29 and 30: 4.7 Nutritional status of children
Page 31 and 32: 120100Fig.6 Distance charts for Hei
Page 33 and 34: The overall prevalence of stunting
Page 35 and 36: Literacy status of fatherThe nutrit
Page 37 and 38: Fig.13 Prevalence (%) of Undernutri
Page 39 and 40: Type of houseThe prevalence of unde
Page 41 and 42: study, colostrum was given by major
Page 43 and 44: REFERENCES1. de Onis M, Blossner M,
Page 45 and 46: TABLES
Page 47 and 48: Table - 2Socio-economic Profile of
Page 49 and 50: Table - 3Physical facilities of the
Page 51 and 52: Table - 6Particulars of last pregna
Page 53 and 54: Table - 6 (Contd…)Particulars of
Page 55 and 56: Table - 8Distribution (%) of < 60 m
Page 57 and 58: Table - 11Distribution (%) of infan
Page 59 and 60:
Table - 13Distribution (%) of 12-35
Page 61 and 62:
Table - 14Distribution (%) of mothe
Page 63 and 64:
Table - 16Distribution (%) of mothe
Page 65 and 66:
Table -18Distribution (%) of 12- 24
Page 67 and 68:
Table - 20Distribution (%) of 12-59
Page 69 and 70:
nTable -22Mean Height and weight of
Page 71 and 72:
Table -24Distribution (%) of 0- 59
Page 73 and 74:
Table -25 (Contd...)Distribution (%
show all

Assessment of Nutritional Status of under-five year rural children in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?