Table 4 <strong>Selection</strong> Specification (Source: GB11651-89, Schedule 3) (Prohibited (M<strong>and</strong>atory Types) (Recommended Types)Types)A11 C14, C15, C21, C22, C23, C17C34A12 C18, C34, C50, C51 C24A13 C50 C17, C24, C34A14C17A15C25, C26A16C27A17C28A18C30A19C29, C32A20C31, C33A21 B03 C35, C36 C40A22C35, C44A23C37, C50A24 B04 C34, C37, C50A25 B03 C43 C35, C40, C44A26 C50 C41, C44, C45A27C45A28C38A29C39A30 C46 C05, C06, C07, C08, C37,C40A31 C40, C48 C36, C47A32C46A33C49A34 C35 C18, C25, C38, C44, C46A35 C50 C27, C37, C42A36 C50 C18, C27, C37, C46A37C50A38C5023
<strong>The</strong> apparently oversimplified guideline may be <strong>of</strong> limited uses. While it is true that somejobs are inherently more dangerous than others, modern accident researchers opt the viewthat incidents are multiple causation <strong>and</strong> root causes <strong>of</strong>ten relate to the management system(Heinrich, Petersen <strong>and</strong> Roos, 1980). Chmiel (2000) further suggested that workplace couldinvolve various environmental <strong>and</strong> social conditions, such as noise, heat, illumination, longhours <strong>and</strong> production targets. It is important to investigate <strong>and</strong> conduct assessment onindividual job process to identify effective protective equipment.2.2.5 <strong>Selection</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> PPE<strong>The</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Employment <strong>of</strong> Queensl<strong>and</strong> Government has prepared an industrialguideline, Workplace Health <strong>and</strong> Safety Management Advisory St<strong>and</strong>ard 2000 Supplement1 – Personal Protective Equipment, to guide the selection <strong>of</strong> PPE. Key selection factors are:• Risk assessment <strong>of</strong> the work process.• Matching the acceptable risk level <strong>and</strong> the performance requirement <strong>of</strong> PPE.• Ensure the selected PPE is compatible with other types <strong>of</strong> PPE being adopted inthe same process.• Comfort <strong>and</strong> fitness• Effect <strong>of</strong> heatStull (1998) further suggested a checklist approach in the selection <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> PPE asshown in Table 524
- Page 1 and 2: University of Western SydneyIn Conj
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgementsWith specific refer
- Page 5 and 6: • 90% of the electricians of the
- Page 7 and 8: 2.1.3 Electrical Hazards 102.1.3.1
- Page 9 and 10: 4.2.11 Allergy 695 Summary, Conclus
- Page 11 and 12: Content of the StudyIn Chapter One,
- Page 15: List of IllustrationsIllustration T
- Page 18: 1. IntroductionThis project focuses
- Page 24 and 25: 2 The Study of Related Literature2.
- Page 26 and 27: life, against which they have no de
- Page 28 and 29: CurrentReaction1 milliamp Just a fa
- Page 30 and 31: Codes ofPracticesGovernmentPublicEd
- Page 32 and 33: • determine what can be done to r
- Page 34 and 35: 2.2.4 Personal Protection DevicesTh
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2 Classification of Work Cate
- Page 38 and 39: Table 3 Grouping of Personal Protec
- Page 42 and 43: Table 5ProcedureConduct a riskasses
- Page 44 and 45: 2.3.1 Hierarchy of Control on Elect
- Page 46 and 47: from electricity in work activities
- Page 48 and 49: • Maximum allowable current to pa
- Page 50 and 51: • Circumference of wrist• Circu
- Page 52 and 53: andProof Test Voltage is either the
- Page 54 and 55: 2.4.4 BS 697 : 1986, Specification
- Page 56 and 57: 2.4.6 JIS T 8112, Rubber gloves for
- Page 58 and 59: 2.5 Summary: What is Known and What
- Page 60 and 61: 3 Survey on the Selection and Use o
- Page 62 and 63: The electricians in the pilot study
- Page 64 and 65: 3.2.3 Sampling StrategyThere is no
- Page 66 and 67: A flowchart was prepared to help th
- Page 68 and 69: 4. Results of the Study4.1 Profile
- Page 70 and 71: 4.2 Profile of the Electricians und
- Page 72 and 73: 4.2.3 Years of Electrical Work Expe
- Page 74 and 75: 4.2.4 Risk Assessment and Safety Ac
- Page 76 and 77: Table 22 tabulates the response of
- Page 78 and 79: Table 24 indicates the ranking of r
- Page 80 and 81: 4.2.7 Where Were Insulating Gloves
- Page 82 and 83: Majority of the relies focused on p
- Page 84 and 85: Figure 17 shows that 55% of the REW
- Page 86 and 87: 4.2.11 AllergyIn response to the in
- Page 88 and 89: applications and subsequent date re
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3 RecommendationsBased on the fin
- Page 92 and 93:
5.3.1.2 Special contact requirement
- Page 94 and 95:
Illustration 1. To determineglove s
- Page 96 and 97:
5.3.1.6 Puncture, snag, tear and cu
- Page 98 and 99:
5.3.2.1 Air TestAir test should be
- Page 100 and 101:
5.3.2.3 StretchingStretch the thumb
- Page 102 and 103:
5.3.3 Maintenance Guide5.3.3.1 Stor
- Page 104 and 105:
ReferenceAdam, J. 1995, Risk, UCL P
- Page 106 and 107:
IEE - Health and Safety Briefing 34
- Page 108 and 109:
Occupational Safety and Health Conv
- Page 110 and 111:
Youngman, M. B. 1982, REDIGUIDE 12
- Page 112 and 113:
Guidance NotesonThe Selection, Use
- Page 114 and 115:
4. Electrical HazardsElectrical saf
- Page 116 and 117:
5. Protective StrategiesUnder Secti
- Page 118 and 119:
5.4 Hierarchy of Control on Electri
- Page 120 and 121:
BS EN60903: 1993;D120-95 of ASTM199
- Page 122 and 123:
6.5 Size and fitProper size and fit
- Page 124 and 125:
6.6 Puncture, snag, tear and cut re
- Page 126 and 127:
7.2 Hand Rolling and Pinch RollingS
- Page 128 and 129:
8. Care and Maintenance of Insulati
- Page 130 and 131:
Electrical Protective Gloves Survey
- Page 132 and 133:
HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING F
- Page 134 and 135:
Appendix CQuestionnaire (Chinese) o
- Page 136 and 137:
9. / (Lockout/Tagout Procedure)? 1
- Page 138:
30. ?, , ___________________31. ?