12.07.2015 Views

A Social Report for Ireland Volume II - the NESC Website

A Social Report for Ireland Volume II - the NESC Website

A Social Report for Ireland Volume II - the NESC Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264Figure 9.16 Percentage in Employment Aged 15-64, 2004%100807975686040464049 4938462025015-2425-34 35-44 45-54 55-64With a DisabilityAll PersonsSource CSO 2004 (QNHS Q1 2004 Disability Update)Persons reporting a disability/health problem worked on average 34.9 hours perweek compared to 36.8 hours per week <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall population (CSO, 2004: 1). TheOECD notes that in most countries people with ‘health problems’ are significantlymore likely to work part-time (OECD, 2009a: 11). Hours worked affects earningslevels. Gannon and Nolan (2005: 10) found that while <strong>the</strong>re was little differencebetween <strong>the</strong> average earnings of all male employees and <strong>the</strong> average earnings ofmale employees with a disability, women with a disability did have lower weeklyearnings, primarily because <strong>the</strong>y worked fewer hours per week. 181 There is anearnings gap between those whose disability hampers daily activities and thosewhose disability does not. Disability also has an indirect impact on earnings as itmay have an effect on <strong>the</strong> level of education attained (see below) and on years ofwork experience.Gannon and Nolan also found (2006: 9) that <strong>the</strong> onset of disability <strong>for</strong> adultsof working age led to a decline of about 20 percentage points in <strong>the</strong> probabilityof being in employment, especially if <strong>the</strong> person was hampered in his/her dailyactivities. Conversely, when an adult moved from reporting disability to notreporting disability <strong>the</strong>re was an increase of about 7 percentage points in <strong>the</strong>probability of his/her being in employment.Employment in <strong>the</strong> Public ServiceSince 1977 <strong>the</strong>re has been an in<strong>for</strong>mal requirement <strong>for</strong> public bodies to employ aminimum quota of 3 per cent of people with disabilities. The Disability Act 2005 hasnow put this in<strong>for</strong>mal requirement into law, along with <strong>the</strong> obligation to take allreasonable measures to comply with <strong>the</strong> law. Monitoring <strong>the</strong> employment of peoplewith disabilities in <strong>the</strong> public service has been fraught with difficulties, includingdefining disability, disclosing disability, promoting a positive environment <strong>for</strong>people with disabilities and reporting on <strong>the</strong> proportion of people with disabilitiesin <strong>the</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce. The NDA has produced two reports on compliance with <strong>the</strong> 3 percent quota in <strong>the</strong> public service (National Disability Authority, 2006a & 2007a).181. Disabled women’s hourly earnings were actually somewhat higher than average. Thus, <strong>the</strong> picture is quite complex. When <strong>the</strong> ageand education profile of women in employment and reporting a chronic illness or disability is looked at in more detail, it is foundthat <strong>the</strong>y are older and more highly educated than <strong>the</strong> (much larger) group of women employees without a disability with whom<strong>the</strong>y are being compared. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, limited sample size did not allow more sophisticated statistical analysis of this data(Gannon and Nolan, 2005: 41).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!