Grid Job Routing Algorithms - Phosphorus

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Grid Job Routing Algorithmsthe benefit that ICBR offers compared with SP routing for both heterogeneous and homogeneousenvironments. Here we have to notice that even when fiber and various element characteristics are the same inthe whole topology, the network still demonstrates a degree of heterogeneity since two nodes of the network(PSNC and SURFnet) have a higher number of input/output ports (fiber counts) and they are directly connectedto a larger number of other network neighbouring nodes compared to the rest of the nodes. This introduces alarger number of crosstalk interferers if all the connections through these two nodes are utilized. Therefore,when ICBR is utilized for both heterogeneous (Figure 6.9a) and homogeneous (Figure 6.9b) network scenariosan important improvement is observed.Blocking Percentage (%)807060504030(a)ICBRSPBlocking Percentage (%)706050403020(b)ICBRSP2060 70 80 90 100Span Length (km)1060 70 80 90 100Span Length (km)Figure 6.9 : Blocking percentage versus span length for ICBR and SP for the European PHOSPHORUSScenario for (a) Heterogeneous and (b) Homogeneous fiber parametersIn Figure 6.10 we investigate how the ICBR routing algorithm responds to the increase of the traffic load. In thesame figure we also included a plot of the blocking percentage when impairments are not considered in thenetwork (black line) and therefore the blocking is only due to the traffic conditions in this case. The inevitableblocking percentage increase with the traffic load observed in Figure 6.10 is indicated by this black line. TheICBR scheme demonstrates similar blocking increase (around 20% for all loads) whereas the SP schemeappears inappropriate to satisfy the increasing traffic demands (the blocking percentage is increasing from 40%to 60%)Project:PHOSPHORUSDeliverable Number: D.5.3Date of Issue: 31/06/07EC Contract No.: 034115Document Code: Phosphorus-WP5-D5.366
Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsBlocking Percentage (%)10080604020ICBRSPNo Impairments040 60 80 100 120RequestsFigure 6.10 : Blocking percentage for different traffic demandsIn terms of the physical parameters that influence the network performance, the behaviour of the two routingschemes for various dispersion approaches is examined. Figure 6.11a presents the blocking percentage whenICBR is used whereas Figure 6.11b demonstrates similar results for the SP case. According to these figures itcan be concluded that the ICBR provides the capability of flexible engineering since a wider region ofdispersion parameters offer improved network performance compared to the SP scheme.Inline Dispersion (ps/nm)806040205050506055605530704020(a)402015750-1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0Pre-Compensation(ps/nm)51510Inline Dispersion (ps/nm)80606040207060705060804030(b)150-1200 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0Pre-Compensation(ps/nm)30102030Figure 6.11 : Blocking percentage for various dispersion maps for ICBR and SP routingProject:PHOSPHORUSDeliverable Number: D.5.3Date of Issue: 31/06/07EC Contract No.: 034115Document Code: Phosphorus-WP5-D5.367
Page 1 and 2:
034115PHOSPHORUSLambda User Control
Page 3 and 4:
List of ContributorsGeorge Markidis
Page 5:
Grid Job Routing Algorithms6.1.1 Ph
Page 8 and 9:
0 Executive SummaryThis deliverable
Page 10 and 11:
1 Objectives and ScopeThis document
Page 12 and 13:
Grid Job Routing Algorithmscan only
Page 14 and 15:
Grid Job Routing Algorithms3 Introd
Page 16 and 17: Grid Job Routing Algorithms• 3R R
Page 18 and 19: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsRouting
Page 20 and 21: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsassignme
Page 22 and 23: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsIn [Birm
Page 24 and 25: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsFigure 3
Page 26 and 27: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsnetwork
Page 28 and 29: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsarrival
Page 30 and 31: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsUnfortun
Page 32 and 33: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsCrosstal
Page 34 and 35: Grid Job Routing Algorithmswhere f
Page 36 and 37: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsrelated
Page 38 and 39: Grid Job Routing Algorithmswhere M
Page 40 and 41: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsa = a
Page 42 and 43: Grid Job Routing Algorithms4.1.3 Pe
Page 44 and 45: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsto the C
Page 46 and 47: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsThis mod
Page 52 and 53: Grid Job Routing Algorithms6 Enhanc
Page 54 and 55: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsPhase 1:
Page 62 and 63: Grid Job Routing Algorithms6.1.1.2
Page 64 and 65: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsIn the I
Page 68 and 69: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsIn the f
Page 70 and 71: Grid Job Routing Algorithms15Number
Page 72 and 73: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsBlocking
Page 74 and 75: 20Grid Job Routing Algorithms80(a)8
Page 76 and 77: Grid Job Routing Algorithms∑Ilcom
Page 78 and 79: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsC : The
Page 82 and 83: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsFurther
Page 86 and 87: Grid Job Routing Algorithmssolution
Page 88 and 89: Grid Job Routing Algorithmscentrali
Page 90 and 91: Grid Job Routing Algorithms[Chen98]
Page 92 and 93: Grid Job Routing Algorithms[Papadim
Page 94 and 95: Grid Job Routing Algorithms9 Acrony
Page 96 and 97: Grid Job Routing AlgorithmsAppendix
Page 98 and 99: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsc4. ∑
Page 100: Grid Job Routing Algorithmsc'4. ∑
show all

Grid Job Routing Algorithms - Phosphorus

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?