Overview of the Groundwater Hydrology of the Rio Grande Basin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

the central basin area between Albuquerque andRio Rancho. Its base is at mean sea level, whichis about 3,200 feet below the active layers of thegroundwater-flow model discussed in the concludingsection of this report. As in the Alamosasubbasin, the major aquifer system utilized in theAlbuquerque-Rio Rancho metropolitan areacomprises the upper and middle Santa Fe HydrostratigraphicUnits (HSUs: USF and MSF) asoriginally defined in Hawley and Haase (1992)and Hawley and others (1995). However, theAlbuquerque Basin is typical of all RGR basins inNew Mexico in that the Rio Grande Valleysystem is (1) deeply entrenched and (2) contains ahydrologically very significant inner valley fill ofLate Quaternary River deposits (HSU-RG). Themajor aquifer is the ancestral Rio Grande (fluvial)facies in the upper and upper part of the middleSanta Fe HSUs (primary LFAs 1-3). The troughin the water table, schematically shown beneaththe Llano de Alburquerque on Figure 8, is hereinterpreted as a feature bounded by major faultzones that restrict groundwater inflow fromadjacent parts of the Rio Grande and Rio PuercoValleys.The Middle Rio Grande Basin betweenCochiti Dam and Elephant Butte Reservoir is themajor area of ongoing geologic, geophysical,hydrologic, and hydrogeochemical investigationsin the entire RGR region (Haneberg 1995, 1998;Hansen and Gorbach 1997; Slate 1998; Bartolino1999; Pazzaglia and Lucas 1999). There willclearly be some revisions in the conceptual hydrogeologicmodels of this complex basin system asthe result of this work. Basic model interpretations(Hawley et al. 1995, and Kernodle et al.1995), however, still appear to be validated bycurrent investigations.The Rio GrandeCompact:It’s the Law!Overviewof theHydrogeologyandGeohydrologyof theNorthern RioGrande Basin -Colorado,New Mexico,andTexasFigure 9. Schematic hydrogeologic cross section of the central Mesilla Basin (Bolson) near the 32nd Parallelin Dona Aña County, New Mexico and northwestern El Paso County, Texas. Modified from Hawley andLozinsky (1992, Plate 16C).WRRIConferenceProceedings199914
Figure 9 is a schematic hydrogeologic crosssectionof the south-central Mesilla Basin, whichis approximately aligned along the 32 nd Parallel.The section is based on (1) geologic mapping,primarily by Seager and others (1987), and (2)subsurface geophysical, hydrogeologic, andwater-quality information collected by Hawleyand Lozinsky (1992). Major contributors to thehydrogeologic interpretations shown in Figure 9include Leggat and others (1962), Cliett (1969),Hawley and others (1969), King and others(1971), Gile and others (1981), Wilson and others(1981), Peterson and others (1984), Seager andothers (1987), and Ken Stevens (USGS-WRDunpublished).The distinctive feature of the rift-basin-fillsequence in the Mesilla Basin is that it is relativelythin in comparison to the Albuquerque andSan Luis basins, with a saturated thickness of nomore than 3,000 ft. As in basin areas to the northand the Hueco Bolson to the southeast, the mostproductive and thickest aquifers are ancestral RioGrande fluvial deposits (LFAs 1 and 2) of theupper Santa Fe HSU (USF2). However, theseunits are only saturated in the northeastern part ofthe basin near Las Cruces (Hawley and Lozinsky1992). In the southern and western part of thebasin the upper Santa Fe HSU is entirely in thevadose zone, and the most productive aquiferscomprise the middle and lower Santa Fe HSUs(MSF2/LSF2: LFAs 3 and 4). A particularlyproductive aquifer is the “deep aquifer”of Leggatand others (1962), which underlies the southernMesilla Valley in the Anthony-Canutillo area(HSU LSF 2, Figure 9). This unit includes adistinctive eolian sand facies (LFA 4) that intertonguesmountainward with piedmont fanglomerates(LFAs 7-8), and basinward with basinfloorfacies assemblages LFAs (3, 9 and 10?). Thelatter facies are here interpreted as fluvial-deltaicplaya/lakedeposits (Table 1, Figure 5).GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELSIntroductionGroundwater-flow models are a numericalway (just one) to merge hydrogeology and geohydrologyto produce a link between cause, process,and effect. The intention is an attempt to predictthe future or to test the validity of the conceptualmodel of the groundwater system. In so doing,the usual approach is to replicate as closely aspossible every internal condition and outsideinfluence that can affect groundwater flow levels(heads). Even so, the title of Knoikow andBredehoeft’s 1992 article says it all: “Groundwatermodels cannot be validated.” Modeling isan ever-evolving and ever-learning iterativeprocess as more knowledge of the system isgained and incorporated. Improvements in scienceand technology will always be necessary forproper utilization of this new knowledge base.Models of groundwater flow in the RioGrande Basin aquifer system first need to beexamined in terms of the hydrogeologic constraintsplaced on flow regimes by structuralboundary,lithofacies, and hydrostratigraphicconditions that are either well documented orreasonably inferred (Table 4). Kernodle’s (1992)critique of “U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water-Flow Models of Basin-Fill Aquifers in theSouthwestern Alluvial basins region” sets the tonefor this paper. “As a rule identifiable geologicfeatures that affect groundwater-flow paths,including geologic structure and lithology of beds,need to be represented in the model (p.65)”; andmajor categories of geohydrologic boundaries inalluvial basins include: “1) internal boundariesthat alter flow paths, including small-permeabilitybeds, fissure-flow volcanics and faults; 2) rechargeboundaries, primarily around the perimeterof basins (mountain-front recharge), and along thechannels of intermittent streams, arroyos, andwashes (tributary recharge); [and] 3) recharge anddischarge boundaries associated with semipermanentsurface-water systems in the flood plains ofmajor streams ... (p. 66)”. Finally, “althoughtwo-dimensional models may successfully reproduceselected responses of the aquifer, they fail toaccurately mimic the function of the system (p.59)”. In comparison ... three-dimensional modelsmore accurately portray the flow system in basinfill[aquifers] by simulating the vertical componentof flow. However, the worth of the model isstill a function of the accuracy of the hydrologist’sconcept of the workings of the aquifer system (p.59).”The Rio GrandeCompact:It’s the Law!Overviewof theHydrogeologyandGeohydrologyof theNorthern RioGrande Basin -Colorado,New Mexico,andTexasWRRIConferenceProceedings199915
Page 1 and 2: John Hawley has a Ph.D. in geology
Page 3 and 4: The Rio GrandeCompact:It’s the La
Page 5: Journal of Uncertain Systems, Vol.6
Page 8 and 9: Table 2. Summary of properties that
Page 10 and 11: Hydrostratigraphic UnitsMost interm
Page 12 and 13: asin exploration for hydrocarbon an
Page 16 and 17: The Rio GrandeCompact:It’s the La
Page 18 and 19: asins and 2 to 10 feet per day in t
Page 20 and 21: Cushman, R.L. 1965. An evaluation o
Page 22 and 23: Kernodle, J.M. 1998. Simulation of
Page 24: Thorn, C.R., D.P. McAda, and J.M. K

Overview of the Groundwater Hydrology of the Rio Grande Basin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?