12.07.2015 Views

Systematic review and evidence- based guidance ... - ECDC - Europa

Systematic review and evidence- based guidance ... - ECDC - Europa

Systematic review and evidence- based guidance ... - ECDC - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>evidence</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>guidance</strong> on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxisTECHNICAL REPORTFiguresFigure 1. Flowchart: developing five key modalities for PAP ............................................................................. 10Figure 2. PRISMA flowchart: identified, screened, <strong>and</strong> included/excluded studies ............................................... 12Figure 3. Expert grading of the proposed PAP modalities ................................................................................. 27Figure 4. Summary of the experts’ recommendation to proposed PAP modalities ............................................... 28TablesTable 1. Limitations in study design suggesting a high likelihood of bias ............................................................. 8Table 2. Equivalency levels of Ranji et al.’s grades to the grades assigned by the GRADE approach [22-25] ........... 9Table 3. Distribution of included study designs <strong>and</strong> geographical location of studies, by continent ....................... 12Table 4. Distribution of included study design <strong>and</strong> geographical location of included studies, Objective 1 ............. 13Table 5. Distribution of included study design <strong>and</strong> geographical location of included studies, Objective 2 ............. 16Table 6. Distribution of included study design <strong>and</strong> geographical location of included studies, Objective 3 ............. 18Table 7. Distribution of included study design <strong>and</strong> geographical location of included studies, Objective 4 ............. 19Table 8. Distribution of included study design <strong>and</strong> geographical location of included studies, Objective 5 ............. 22Table 9. Studies supporting Modality 1 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ........................................................................ 23Table 10. Studies supporting Modality 2 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 23Table 11. Studies supporting Modality 3 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 24Table 12. Studies supporting Modality 4 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 24Table 13. Studies supporting Modality 5 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 25Table 14. Studies supporting Modality 6 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 25Table 15. Studies supporting Modality 7 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 25Table 16. Studies supporting Modality 8 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 26Table 17. Studies supporting Modality 9 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ...................................................................... 26Table 18. Studies supporting Modality 10 <strong>and</strong> quality of <strong>evidence</strong> ..................................................................... 27Table 19. PAP modalities as outlined at the first expert meeting ....................................................................... 28Table 20. Results of the experts’ re-scoring by email of 10 PAP modalities prior to the second expert meeting ..... 29Table 21. Final five key modalities for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis ......................................................... 31Table 22. Final five key PAP modalities <strong>and</strong> corresponding indicators ................................................................ 31Table 23. Experts’ consensus for each proposed barrier ................................................................................... 32Table 24. Checklist for Indicator 1 ................................................................................................................. 33Tables in AnnexesTable 1.1. Search strategy of MEDLINE via PubMed for Objectives 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> 3.................................................... 44Table 1.2. Search of MEDLINE/Embase via OVID for Objectives 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 ....................................................... 44Table 1.3. Search of MEDLINE via PubMed for Objective 4 ............................................................................... 44Table 1.4. Search of MEDLINE via PubMed for Objective 5 ............................................................................... 45Table 1.5. Search of MEDLINE via PubMed for Objective 5 ............................................................................... 45Table 1.6. Search of MEDLINE/Embase via OVID for Objective 5 ...................................................................... 45Table 2.1. Excluded studies .......................................................................................................................... 46iv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!