Highlights of PSDP 2011 - 2017 - NSCB

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Issues Data quality• Accessibility and clarity• Not proactively disseminated; no informationabout data• Difficult access, e.g., paper form, long process, noton website, on website but static (pdf)• High cost of data/microdata• Concern on transparency of methodologies andrevisions; unstated/lack of revision policy• Comparability and coherence• Related surveys not coherent• Census and related survey not comparable• Concerns on comparability due to method changesPSDP Advocacy Forum • 23 October 2012 • San Fernando City, La Union, Philippines8
Issues Data use• Increase in use of statistics at national level; stilllimited at local levels• Possible misuse and abuse of statistics bygovernment institutions for eligibility to assistanceIssues Capacity of data producers and providers• Significant capacity gap between MSAs and otherdata producers and LGUs• Limited funds to finance research and development,professional and career development• Need to expand education of respondentsPSDP Advocacy Forum • 23 October 2012 • San Fernando City, La Union, Philippines9
Page 1 and 2: PSDPPhilippine StatisticalDevelopme
Page 3 and 4: In these numbers rests our past.In
Page 5 and 6: monitoring andevaluationintelligenc
Page 7: Issues Data quality• Relevance•
Page 11 and 12: Issues Statistical infrastructure
Page 13 and 14: unfortunately, the resources for st
Page 15 and 16: Key outputs and outcomes in the PSD
Page 17 and 18: Key outputs and outcomes in support
Page 19 and 20: Other key outputs and outcomesGood
Page 21 and 22: Coverage in terms of data• nation
Page 23 and 24: Key developments, 2005-2011•Small
Page 25 and 26: Key developments, 2005-2011•Estab
Page 27 and 28: Key outcomes and programs, 2011-201

Highlights of PSDP 2011 - 2017 - NSCB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?