12.07.2015 Views

applied fracture mechanics

applied fracture mechanics

applied fracture mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fractal Fracture Mechanics Applied to Materials Engineering 917.2. Fracture testsA standard three-point bending test was performed on alumina specimens, SE(B), notchedplane. Low speed and constant prescribed displacement 1 mm/min was employed to obtainstable propagation. The R-curve was obtained using LEFM equations and <strong>fracture</strong> resultsare shown in Table 1.The <strong>fracture</strong> toughness evaluation of metallic samples was executed using the J-integralconcept and the elastic compliance technique with partial unloadings of 15% of themaximum load. For weld metals the J-R curve tests were performed by the compliance andmulti-test techniques. Tests were executed in a MTS810 (Material Test System) system atambient temperature, according to standard ASTM E1737-96 [15]. A single edge notchbending SENB and compact tension CT were used. One J-R curve for each tested specimenwas retrieved and <strong>fracture</strong> results are shown in Table 1.To obtain the <strong>fracture</strong>d surfaces of polymeric materials, <strong>fracture</strong> toughness tests wereperformed by multiple specimen technique using the concept of J-R curve according toASTM D6068-2002 [42]. However, these tests were different from the ones used for weldmetals, due to the viscoelasticity of the polymers. The used nomenclatures PU0,5 and PU1,0mean the loading rate used during the test, 0,5 mm/min and 1,0 mm/min, respectively.Fracture results are shown in Table 1.7.3. Fractal analyses of <strong>fracture</strong>d specimensThe <strong>fracture</strong>d surfaces of ceramic samples were obtained with a Rank Taylor Hobsonprofilometer (Talysurf model 120) and an HP 6300 scanner. The fractal analyses to obtain theHurst dimensions were made by methods, such as Counting Box, Sand Box and Fouriertransform. The <strong>fracture</strong> surface analysis of metallic and polymeric samples were executedusing scanning electronic microscopy SEM and the analyses to obtain the Hurst exponentswere made with the Contrast Islands Fractal Analysis. Fractal dimension results are shownin the last column of Table 1.7.4. G-R and J-R curve tests and fitting with self-similar and self-affine fractalmodelsA characteristic load-displacement result in the Alumina ceramic sample is shown in Figure7. Observe that the stiffness of the material at the first deflection region is constant,corresponding to the elastic modulus of the material. However, as the crack propagates, thestiffness varies significantly.The corresponding G-R curve test is shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that at the onset ofcrack growth ( L0 L0C), the behavior of this material is self-similar, as previouslydiscussed. However, the results in the wider range of crack lengths ( L0C L0 L0 max) showthat this material behave according to the self-affine model. Finally, at the end of G-R curve

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!