Comparative analysis of Maritime Spatial Planning ... - Seanergy 2020

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Encourage the use of legislation to make one centralised institution responsible for collating alldata relevant for MSP with other institutions legally bound to provide regularly updated data.Deliverable 2.318 | P a g e
4 PERMITTING AND LICENSINGPermitting and licensing play key a role in Renewable Energy planning and implementation. In the contextof Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP), permits or licences are the means whereby the overall objectives ofMSP are translated into the rights and duties of individual project participants.4.1 Best practice in terms of permitting and licensing4.1.1 Guiding PrinciplesMany actions in the planning and implementation stages of Offshore Renewable Energy Projects (O-RE)projects are subject to permits and licensing and the main question is the extent to which the issue ofpermits is coordinated between different sectors e.g. maritime planning or electricity supply, the sectoralagencies, and between the overall objectives, in other words how streamlined and transparent is theprocess. The administrative procedures and the number and duration of permits have also beenaddressed by the WindBarriers project 10 which allows a complementary view to be taken. Furthermore, theprocess of applying for, determining and issuing permits has a cost both to the state and to individualapplicants. The extent to which permitting procedures are transparent and simple therefore gives anindication as to their relative ease of use, indirectly to the cost to applicants and e- the overall coherence ofthe spatial planning system.The legal framework for issue of licences or permits should be clear and efficient, but most importantly theinstitutional set-up (jurisdiction and cooperation/coordination) should be designed in a way that allows fora final decision that covers all aspects of a permit in a comprehensive, coherent, consistent andcost/effective manner.The implication of this is that the relationship between all authorities (on different levels, local, regional ornational, or sectors) involved in licensing should be well-coordinated, and the division of competencies andbetween the authorities should be clear. This is important since the underlying idea is that the overall setupshould allow for all relevant aspects/impacts of the licensing decision to be dealt with in an integratedand comprehensive manner. The evaluation reflects growing degrees of clarity of jurisdictions and theability of the system to provide for an integrated and comprehensive decision.10 The major objective of the IEE funded project, WindBarriers project (01 December 2008 – 30 November 2010) wasto obtain quantifiable data on barriers to administrative and grid access affecting the deployment of the wind energydevelopment in the EU countries. This project constituted the first attempt to systematically collect and quantifyadministrative and grid access data at EU level.Deliverable 2.319 | P a g e
Page 2 and 3: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis study forms p
Page 4 and 5: TASK 2.6: TABLE OF CONTENTSTASK 2.6
Page 6 and 7: 1 INTRODUCTIONThis report responds
Page 8 and 9: Before going any further in terms o
Page 10 and 11: procedures, in terms of for example
Page 12 and 13: 3 DATA AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT3.
Page 14 and 15: 3.3 Best practice in data and infor
Page 16 and 17: the required data. Once the „cada
Page 20 and 21: As the effectiveness and efficiency
Page 22 and 23: seabed without an EEZ claim being m
Page 24 and 25: een granted. A similar indicator wa
Page 26 and 27: The national reports indicate that
Page 28 and 29: The EIAs should be harmonised to en
Page 30 and 31: Levels of public consultation are m
Page 32 and 33: What particularly distinguishes som
Page 34 and 35: All relevant stakeholders are repre
Page 36 and 37: 6.3 Best practice in sector conflic
Page 38 and 39: 6.3.3 Conflict minimisation agreeme
Page 40 and 41: 7 TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATIONThe aim
Page 42 and 43: Support regional sea-basin cooperat
Page 44 and 45: 6. Stakeholder participation;7. Pre
Page 46 and 47: 2. Specifying criteria for selectin
Page 48 and 49: Optimal spatial use of the maritime
Page 50 and 51: 9 FINAL POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS9.1 O
Page 52 and 53: There should be a central instituti
Page 54 and 55: 9.3.2 Transboundary cooperationUse
Page 56 and 57: Iuga, D (2010) Analysis of MSP in t
Page 58 and 59: Task 2.7: Table of Contents1 ATLANT
Page 60 and 61: 2. ATLANTIC OCEAN AND IRISH SEAThe
Page 62 and 63: • MSP on a sea basin level should
Page 64 and 65: • Possible impacts of grid expans
Page 66 and 67: undertaken like the „North Seas C
Page 68 and 69:
3. MEDITERRANEAN SEAThe Mediterrane
Page 70 and 71:
3.1.2 Good practicesGreece has rece
Page 72 and 73:
simplifies the permitting and licen
Page 74 and 75:
) consult all relevant groups and s
Page 76 and 77:
• Explore the role of the existin
Page 78 and 79:
• limited availability of maritim
Page 80 and 81:
In Denmark, the Integrated Marine S
Page 82 and 83:
a) is legally anchored on renewable
Page 84 and 85:
4.5.2 Policy recommendations• The
Page 86 and 87:
development of ORE in the North Sea
Page 88 and 89:
Estonia has established a four stag
Page 90 and 91:
5.5.2 Good practicesPoland and Latv
Page 92:
Poland BaltSeaPlan 0 500 wind YesSw
show all

Comparative analysis of Maritime Spatial Planning ... - Seanergy 2020

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?