Comparative analysis of Maritime Spatial Planning ... - Seanergy 2020

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Iuga, D (2010) Analysis of MSP in the Baltic Sea – Country report FinlandJacques, S. (2011) National maritime spatial planning regimes – BelgiumJaques, S & Joseph, P (3E) (2011) National maritime spatial planning regimes – FranceJustino, P., Costa, P., & Estanqueiro, A (2011) Ireland: Report on the National MSP Regimes and theirPerformance.MRAG (2008) Legal Aspects of Marine Spatial Planning: Framework Service Contract, No. FISH/2006/09 –LOT2. Final Report to DG Maritime Affairs & FisheriesPlancoast (2008) Handbook on Integrated Maritime Spatial Planning: Experience, Tools & Instruments andCase Studies from the INTERREG III B CADSES PlanCoast Project.http://www.plancoast.eu/files/handbook_web.pdfRodrigues, G., Iuga, D (2010) Country Report: Analysis of MSP in SwedenRodrigues, G., & Iuga, D. (2010) Analysis of MSP in the Baltic/North Sea. Country Report Denmark.Stefanou, I., Rossis, K. (2010) Assessment of the National MSP regimes and their performanceGreece & ItalyToke, D (2010) Report on EEZ and inclusive waters under the authority of the United Kingdom and itsdevolved administrations (Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland) – covering the Irish Sea and North SeaWagner, A (2010) Report defining the criteria for assessing national MSP practices affecting thedeployment of marine renewable energy sourcesWagner, A., & Segelken, K (2011) National MSP practices in Germany affecting the deployment of marinerenewable energy sourcesWolf, R., (2004) “Rechtliche und naturschutzfachliche Aspekte beim Bau und Betrieb von Stromkabeln”,Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, BfNDeliverable 2.356 | P a g e
Part II:TASK 2.7: Barriers and obstacles, good practices and national policyrecommendationsDocument Name:NATIONAL POLICY RECOMMENDATIONSDocument Number: Task 2.7, Part of D 2.3Author:Annemie Vermeylen, revised by SEANERGY 2020 consortium andWP 2 Leader, SOWDate: June 2011WP:WP 2, National Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) RegimesTask: 2.7Deliverable 2.357 | P a g e
Page 2 and 3:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis study forms p
Page 4 and 5:
TASK 2.6: TABLE OF CONTENTSTASK 2.6
Page 6 and 7: 1 INTRODUCTIONThis report responds
Page 8 and 9: Before going any further in terms o
Page 10 and 11: procedures, in terms of for example
Page 12 and 13: 3 DATA AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT3.
Page 14 and 15: 3.3 Best practice in data and infor
Page 16 and 17: the required data. Once the „cada
Page 18 and 19: Encourage the use of legislation to
Page 20 and 21: As the effectiveness and efficiency
Page 22 and 23: seabed without an EEZ claim being m
Page 24 and 25: een granted. A similar indicator wa
Page 26 and 27: The national reports indicate that
Page 28 and 29: The EIAs should be harmonised to en
Page 30 and 31: Levels of public consultation are m
Page 32 and 33: What particularly distinguishes som
Page 34 and 35: All relevant stakeholders are repre
Page 36 and 37: 6.3 Best practice in sector conflic
Page 38 and 39: 6.3.3 Conflict minimisation agreeme
Page 40 and 41: 7 TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATIONThe aim
Page 42 and 43: Support regional sea-basin cooperat
Page 44 and 45: 6. Stakeholder participation;7. Pre
Page 46 and 47: 2. Specifying criteria for selectin
Page 48 and 49: Optimal spatial use of the maritime
Page 50 and 51: 9 FINAL POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS9.1 O
Page 52 and 53: There should be a central instituti
Page 54 and 55: 9.3.2 Transboundary cooperationUse
Page 58 and 59: Task 2.7: Table of Contents1 ATLANT
Page 60 and 61: 2. ATLANTIC OCEAN AND IRISH SEAThe
Page 62 and 63: • MSP on a sea basin level should
Page 64 and 65: • Possible impacts of grid expans
Page 66 and 67: undertaken like the „North Seas C
Page 68 and 69: 3. MEDITERRANEAN SEAThe Mediterrane
Page 70 and 71: 3.1.2 Good practicesGreece has rece
Page 72 and 73: simplifies the permitting and licen
Page 74 and 75: ) consult all relevant groups and s
Page 76 and 77: • Explore the role of the existin
Page 78 and 79: • limited availability of maritim
Page 80 and 81: In Denmark, the Integrated Marine S
Page 82 and 83: a) is legally anchored on renewable
Page 84 and 85: 4.5.2 Policy recommendations• The
Page 86 and 87: development of ORE in the North Sea
Page 88 and 89: Estonia has established a four stag
Page 90 and 91: 5.5.2 Good practicesPoland and Latv
Page 92: Poland BaltSeaPlan 0 500 wind YesSw
show all

Comparative analysis of Maritime Spatial Planning ... - Seanergy 2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?