ARTICLESAND REPORTSCONSUMERS’ ACCEPTANCEOF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTSMADE WITH HAZELNUTSAND ALMONDSINTRODUCTIONHazelnuts and almonds are used to makeindustrial products like snacks, turrons,marzipan or chocolates. Although there iswide information about their chemicalcomposition and the influence of manyprocesses on the products´ final characteristics,there is a lack of informationabout consumers’ acceptance of these typesof products when hazelnut and almondvarieties change.For these reasons IRTA started in 1999 aresearch programme in order to analyzethe importance of selecting different nutvarieties to make different industrial products,as a consequence of consumers’acceptance. This information could be relevantnot only to producers but also forthe confectionery industry. Results for differentnut products have been publishedin several scientific reports (see references).An overall analysis of hazelnut andalmond commodities is made in this article.Variety is used as synonym of cultivar.METHODOLOGYFrom 1999 to 2002 four hazelnut varieties(‘Negret’, ‘Pauetet’, ‘Tomboul’ and ‘Tondadi Giffoni’) and eight almond varieties(‘Desmayo Largueta’, ‘Francolí’, ‘Glorieta’,‘Marcona’, ‘Masbovera’, ‘Nonpareil’and ‘Planeta’) were used to make severalproducts: dark chocolate with nuts, whitechocolate with nuts, brown chocolate withnuts, bonbons made with roasted nuts enrobedwith burnt sugar and coated withdark chocolate, marzipan and hard andsoft turrons.Chocolates and bonbons were made incollaboration with the industry “L’Art de laXocolata” (El Vendrell, Tarragona), whilemarzipan and turrons were made in theindustry “Turrons i Mel Alemany SL” (Osde Balaguer, Lleida). Hazelnut and almondsamples came from IRTA´s collections,while ‘Tomboul’ hazelnuts and‘Nonpareil’ almonds were purchased onthe market.Each commodity was assessed for industrialfacility, final quality and consumers’acceptance. Commodity acceptance wasevaluated using the consumers panelFigure 1.- Chocolate with nuts.“L’Art de la Xocolata” industryfrom IRTA (table 1), including over 670people (almost 300 families), and distributedall around Catalonia (Spanish NE).Consumer’s answers were weighted byage and education level in order to extrapolateconclusions to Catalonian people.MAIN RESULTSResults show that there are statistical differencesin variety acceptance, dependingon the industrial product studied. Sometimesthese differences can be solvedchanging the technological process, althoughthis has been observed for roastedhazelnuts and not for other products.For example, dark chocolate (Figure 1)was the most accepted, mainly for ‘Pauetet’hazelnut variety and for ‘Masbovera’almond variety. ‘Negret’ and ‘Tomboul’hazelnuts and ‘Desmayo Largueta’ and‘Francolí’ almonds showed a very goodtechnological behaviour to make bonbons(figure 2). ‘Marcona’ almonds were thebest accepted to make marzipan (Figure3) and hard turron (Figure 4), while ‘Negret’variety was the most accepted forhard turron made with hazelnuts. Finally,soft turrons (Figure 5) were most accep-Table 1.- Consumers distribution by sex, age, education level and city size in boththe IRTA panel and the Catalonian people.IRTA’s panelFigure 2.- Chocolate coating to make bonbons.“L’Art de la Xocolata” industryFigure 3.- Cutting marzipan.“Turrons i mels Alemany” industryted when they were made with ‘Marcona’or ‘Desmayo Largueta’ almond varieties.The overall analysis of the results alsoshows that sensorial characteristics fromhazelnuts and almonds must be consideredto make an industrial product. Inmost of them, sensorial profile from roastednuts should be known while in a fewof them the most important is the profilefrom raw nuts. Even though, when a productincludes sugar in its recipe the differencesin taste are not relevant enough,but it is still important that nut taste canbe identified.CataloniaSex: % %Men 49.7 48.8Women 50.3 51.2Age:< 30 years old 23.5 36.730 to 65 years old 68.6 46.1> 65 years old 7.9 17.2City habitants:< 30.000 40.4 43.6> 30.000 59.6 56.4Education level:Basic 34.9 69.3Middle 22.9 20.7High 42.2 10.04 FAO-CIHEAM - Nucis-Newsletter, Number 12 <strong>September</strong> 2004
Figure 4.- Hard turron ‘Alicante’.Labelled and vacuum packaged tabletsFigure 5.- Soft turron ‘Jijona’.Labelled and vacuum packaged tabletsRaw hazelnuts and almonds homogeneityis very important. Even though, this pointshould be studied in more detail for suchkind of products where nuts are grounded,not roasted or sugar enriched. Maindefects to be considered in raw nut bulksare rancidness, bitterness or burnt kernels.Some hazelnut and almond varietiesseem to show serious difficulties to beadapted to some industrial processes,due to a very high fragility or strength, anexcess of splits generation, an inadequatesurface to volume ratio, bad roastingaptitude, etc.Finally, both hazelnuts and almondsseem to show the same acceptation atconsumers level for those particular productsstudied. This could confirm thatthey can substitute each other dependingon the marked price, as it is usually assumed.However, it should be further confirmedfor other products.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSResearch supported by Instituto Nacionalde Investigación y Tecnología Agraria yAlimentaria (INIA) of Spain, project <strong>number</strong>SC99-002.REFERENCESRomero, A., Tous, J.; Guerrero, L.;Gou, P.; Guardia, Mª D., 1999. Aplicacionesdel análisis sensorial en el tostadode avellana en grano. FruticulturaProfesional (Especial Frutos Secos II),104: 71-77.Gou, P.; Díaz, I.; Guerrero, L.; Valero,A.; Arnau, J.; Romero, A. 2000. Physico-chemicaland sensory property changesin almonds of ‘Desmayo Largueta’variety during toasting. Food Sci. Tech.Int., 6 (1): 1-7.Romero, A.; Tous, J., 2000. Nutricionalvalue of hazelnut (Corylus avellana, L.).Nucis-Newsletter, 9 (12): 25-27.Tous, J.; Romero, A., 2002. Almondand hazelnuts products. Consumer´spreferences. Nucis-Newsletter, 10 (12):12-13.Romero, A.; Tous, J.; Plana, J.; Guardiola,MD.; Díaz, I., 2002. How varietychoice affects Spanish consumer´s acceptanceof marzipan and chocolatesmade with almonds. Ed. ISHS. ActaHorticulturae, 591: 117-123.Romero, A.; Tous, J.; Plana, J., 2003.Importancia de la variedad de almendraen la aceptación de turrones tipo ‘Alicante’y ‘Jijona’. II Congreso Nacionalde Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos.Orihuela (Alicante). Ed. UniversidadMiguel Hernández (UMH). VolumenII: 611-614.Romero, A.; Tous, J.; Plana, J. <strong>2004.</strong>How cultivar choice affects spanishconsumers’ acceptance of chocolates,bonbons and hard turron made with hazelnuts.6th Int. Congress on Hazelnut.Tarragona-Reus, 14-18 June.A.Romero and J.TousIRTA, Centre Mas Bové. Apartat 415, 43280-Reus (Tarragona, SpainE-mail: agusti.romero@irta.esDIFFERENTIAL FLOWER ANDFRUIT DAMAGES BY SPRINGFROSTS IN ALMONDINTRODUCTIONFlowers and young fruits of almost all deciduousfruit trees are vulnerable to frostdamage (Andrews et al., 1983). Consequentlyspring frost injury is a major limitingfactor in the production and the distributionof horticultural crops (Ashworth,1992). The anatomical, physiological andbiological aspects of this damage havebeen reviewed in fruit trees (Rodrigo,2000). In Prunus, fruit damage is detectableby observing ovule browning, ice formation(Saunier, 1960), and browning ofthe petals and pistils.Almond (Prunus amygdalus, Batsch) isan early blooming species. As a result, almondcultivation was restricted to regionswith low risk of spring frosts. However,the expansion of the culture into inlandMediterranean areas, where the occurrenceof spring frost is common and overlappingwith bloom of most almond cultivars,increased the risk of reducing oreven nullifying yield (Socias i Company etal., 1999). Thus, almond breeding aimedto create and select late blooming cultivars(Kester and Assay, 1975). Nevertheless,this solution is not enough to overcomespring frost damages, and frosthardness is also considered a selectionobjective in our breeding programme (Sociasi Company et al, 1998).In almond, little is known about the minimumthreshold temperature causing damagesin flowers and young fruits. However,differences among several commercialalmond cultivars were described byFelipe (1988), concluding that at –2.5ºCsome cultivars suffered heavy productionlosses. Our aim was to assess springfrost damage in the flower and youngfruits of several almond selections andtheir consequences on final fruit set.MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study was carried out during the winter-springof 2003 on 21 self-compatibleselections from CITA´s breeding programmeat Zaragoza. They were graftedonto the almond x peach hybrid rootstock‘Garnem’ (Gómez Aparisi et al., 2001).The situation of this orchard, in relation tospring frost, was considered of high risk,because of the frequent incidence of frost(Felipe, 1988).To evaluate the damages caused in flowersand young fruits, samples were collectedtwo days after frost occurrence,placed in polyethylene bags, and taken tothe laboratory. Damage evaluation wasbased on the morphological symptoms,such as brown discolouration of the stylebase in flowers or browning of the ovulein young fruits. To assess the effect offrost on fruit set, all bud flowers werecounted on two branches of each selectionbefore bloom, thus much before frostincidence. Fruit set was recorded in June.Bud density was also measured accordingto Socias i Company (1988).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONA frost of –2.5°C during five hours tookplace in the early morning of March 18,2003. On that day, the almond selectionswere at different phenological stages andcan be separated in two groups (Fig. 1).The first group comprised 12 selectionswhose bloom was already over, thus thefrost affected young fruits. The secondgroup comprised 9 selections that on thatday were opening early flowers; consequently,the frost only affected buds andearly flowers. The behaviour of bothgroups was different and needs to beexamined differently for each group of selections.FAO-CIHEAM - Nucis-Newsletter, Number 12 <strong>September</strong> 20045