12.07.2015 Views

Australian Aid to PNG - AusAID

Australian Aid to PNG - AusAID

Australian Aid to PNG - AusAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the health sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>Australian</strong> assistance (over A$250 million sinceindependence) accounts for over 70% of the donor funding received by PapuaNew Guinea. And its sustained focus on primary health and disease controlsuggests <strong>Australian</strong> aid can claim significant credit for improvements in healthstatus that have occurred.As the severity of Papua New Guinea’s budget constraints worsened and itscapacity for service delivery declined, particularly since the mid-1990s, it hasbeen necessary for <strong>Australian</strong> aid <strong>to</strong> focus on preventing further declines inbasic service delivery and living standards. Much of the positive impact ofAustralia’s aid in recent years has therefore been in maintaining infrastructure,equipment and basic services that, in the interests of sustainable development,should eventually be provided by the national government. In theinfrastructure sec<strong>to</strong>r, for example, Australia’s support for road maintenancecovers more than 25% of the national road network, and represents about triplethe amount Papua New Guinea itself has spent. Likewise, a recent health sec<strong>to</strong>rreview has concluded that the main impacts of <strong>Australian</strong> aid in recent yearshave been related <strong>to</strong> preventing a decline in sec<strong>to</strong>r performance that more thanlikely would otherwise have occurred. In essence, Australia has been helping <strong>to</strong>keep a collapsing health system functional.Australia’s assistance for the renewable resources sec<strong>to</strong>r in Papua New Guinea(A$200 million since independence) has covered a very wide range of subsec<strong>to</strong>rs,and has been limited <strong>to</strong> specific priority concerns, making it difficult <strong>to</strong>isolate the impact of Australia’s contribution <strong>to</strong> improved developmentperformance at a higher level. Further, as with activities in other sec<strong>to</strong>rs,broader impacts have not been well documented in individual activity reports.Overall, it appears that <strong>Australian</strong> aid has been carefully targeted <strong>to</strong> addresssome issues of critical importance, and one can infer from the success ofspecific activities that there have been some important positive developmentimpacts. For example, <strong>Australian</strong> aid was instrumental in developing andintroducing cost-effective strategies and technologies <strong>to</strong> deal with the seriousproblem of coffee rust. While objective data on the impact of this are notavailable, these initiatives increased the quantity of coffee produced byplantations and smallholders, presumably increasing the revenue from thisimportant crop.With governance issues constituting probably the most difficult of Papua NewGuinea’s development challenges, Australia’s role in helping <strong>to</strong> strengtheninstitutions, build capacity, support economic reform, promote transparency,accountability and the rule of law, and encourage greater communityparticipation in development and scrutiny of government performance hasintensified since the late 1990s. Of the <strong>to</strong>tal A$540 million provided <strong>to</strong> thisxii The Contribution of <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Aid</strong> <strong>to</strong> Papua New Guinea’s Development 1975–2000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!