and the company’s lenders do not takeadvantage of their “step-in right”, A-Bananre-assumes responsibility for the railwayfacility and traffic service rights on theState’s track facilities. A-Banan has theright and under certain conditions theobligation to take over six of the seventrains used in the Arlanda Express airportshuttle train service. For the seventh train,there is no such contractual obligation.According to the appropriation directives,<strong>LFV</strong> and BV shall compensate A-Bananfor expenses associated with the projectthat would otherwise have been performedby <strong>LFV</strong> and BV. Compensation from <strong>LFV</strong>in 2007 was SEK 2.3 M (3.9).Financial risks<strong>The</strong> financial operations and financial riskmanagement of <strong>LFV</strong> are coordinated ina separate profit centre, <strong>LFV</strong> Finance. Itsoperations are based on a financial policydocument adopted by <strong>LFV</strong>’s Board ofDirectors, which states the limits withinwhich <strong>LFV</strong> may be exposed to financialrisks in the areas of funding, finance andoperating leases, financial investments andforeign exchange transactions.Interest rate risk in <strong>LFV</strong>’s borrowingportfolio is limited by defining an averageinterest refixing period of 2.5 years with apermitted deviation of ±12 months. <strong>The</strong>interest payments in the borrowing portfolioshould be uniformly distributed.Within a 12-month period, a maximum of50 per cent of liabilities outstanding maybe rolled over.Derivative instruments are activelyused to control interest rate exposure,for example by extending or shorteningthe average fixed-interest period withoutchanging the underlying loan. Surplusliquidity is invested in certificates ofdeposit and with counterparties that havea creditworthiness equivalent to categoryK1 according to the Nordisk Rating systemor its equivalent. Financial investmentsmay not have a maturity period of morethan 12 months.<strong>LFV</strong>’s exchange risks are primarilyrelated to payments for capital expenditures.According to <strong>LFV</strong>’s financial policy,disbursements shall be hedged, for exampleby using currency forward contracts.Credits<strong>LFV</strong> has a credit council that continuouslyreviews the credit situation of all customers.<strong>The</strong> objective is to collect accountsreceivable more quickly and to minimise<strong>LFV</strong>’s credit losses.Other risksAviation market developments <strong>LFV</strong>’sfinances are strongly dependent on aviationmarket developments. Revenue ishighly volume-dependent while costs arelargely fixed. As a result, changes in aviationtraffic volume have a major impact on<strong>LFV</strong>’s earnings.Developments in the domestic marketdue to increased competition for shortdistancetrips as well as the risk that theprivate market may decline in internationaltraffic because aviation is perceivedas too environmentally disruptive aredeemed to be the greatest threats.During 2012, a system for trading inemission allowances for civil aviationwithin the EU is highly likely to be created.This means that it is less likely thatany other environmentally related chargesor taxes will be introduced during theperiod. If civil aviation is not included inemission trading, however, the issue ofother taxes and charges can be expectedto be raised. In a short-term perspective,a national tax on aircraft fuel (or on carbondioxide emissions) is deemed to bethe greatest risk.Action:Maintain strict cost control and reasonablecapital spending volume to achieve a goodproductivity trend. In case of a sharp downturnin traffic, price increases may eventuallybecome necessary. Restructuring mayalso be required in order to adapt operationsto the prevailing traffic volume.Environmental permit conditionsmay limit <strong>LFV</strong>’s developmentpotentialToday several of <strong>LFV</strong>’s airports do nothave environmental permits that allowsufficient production. Most important isthe emission ceiling at Stockholm-Arlanda<strong>Airport</strong>, which must be changed if longtermtraffic growth is to be possible. Atsome airports with valid environmentalpermits, the increasing demands of outsidebodies may lead public authoritiesto re-examine <strong>LFV</strong>’s operations. This, inturn, may lead to production ceilings andtightened environmental permit conditionsthat limit future development potential.A class-action suit has been filedagainst <strong>LFV</strong> claiming continuing damagesdue to aircraft noise from flights abovecentral Upplands Väsby since the thirdrunway went into service at Stockholm-Arlanda <strong>Airport</strong>. <strong>The</strong> suit is classified asa claim for “pure economic loss”. Accordingto information from the court, about6,000 individuals have joined the classactionsuit.Action:More intensive dialogue with neighboursand other stakeholders to describe <strong>LFV</strong>’sactions in managing environmental problemsrelated to noise and emissions.Increased efforts to stimulate greater useof public transport to and from airports.Efforts to bring about changes in the emissionceiling at Stockholm-Arlanda <strong>Airport</strong>in a way that, in the long term, will allowfull utilisation of the airport’s capacity.Weaker growth for airport commercialproducts<strong>LFV</strong>’s financial plan includes a numberof aggressive investments in commercialoperations that imply a major increase inearnings from airport commercial products.If revenue does not increase asplanned, this will adversely affect earnings.An increased number of disputeswith tenants and other commercial playersat airports may also affect future profitability.Action:<strong>LFV</strong> follows developments in other countriescarefully to track market trends.Clearer follow-up in order to spot negativedivergences early and focus on developingnew product categories. In case of weakergrowth, <strong>LFV</strong> may need to take compensatorysteps for aviation-related products.Growth in operating expensesRecently there have been significantincreases in operating expenses for airnavigation services and security screening.<strong>The</strong> increase in air navigation servicesmainly consists of higher salary and pensionexpenses. If <strong>LFV</strong> does not succeed inimplementing efficiency-raising measuresto offset the adverse consequences of thesecost increases, <strong>LFV</strong>’s charges and the airlines’expenses will increase. In securityscreening, the increases are mainly due tostricter screening requirements and thushigher staffing. Any further changes insecurity screening requirements may havean adverse impact on <strong>LFV</strong>’s expenses andthus on charges to airlines for this product.Action:An efficiency-raising plan is being developedat Air Navigation Services.Streamlining and review of the securityscreening process aimed at limiting expensesand active efforts to influence regulatoryauthorities in order to achieve cost-effectivesolutions without sacrificing the levelof security.Capital spending needs<strong>The</strong> pace of capital spending at <strong>LFV</strong> isincreasing, while economic growth in itssurroundings is slowing. If traffic growthshould be weaker than expected and capitalspending requirements in infrastructureshould still increase, for example dueto new security regulations or infrastructureneeds due to peak-period requirements,<strong>LFV</strong>’s profitability will deteriorate.Action:Improved follow-up of capital spending andstrict requirements for thorough financialprojections in commercial projects.Accounts > <strong>LFV</strong> 2007
Performance report according to the annualappropriations directive for <strong>LFV</strong> PERFORMANCE REPORT• On December 15, 2006, the Swedish Government approved the annual appropriations directive for <strong>LFV</strong>for 2007. <strong>The</strong> directive presents the objectives of transport policy, of civil aviation and of the SwedishState’s civilian airports and air navigation services.• <strong>The</strong> directive also stipulates the performance report that the <strong>LFV</strong> shall submit concerning how <strong>LFV</strong>has contributed to achieving such objectives. <strong>The</strong> following section presents the main contents of thedirective and, inserted below each statement of objective, <strong>LFV</strong>’s performance report.Policy field: Transport policy<strong>The</strong> overall transport policy objective is to ensure that citizensand businesses in all parts of the country are provided with transportthat is efficient in terms of the economy as a whole and sustainablein the long term.Branch of operations:State civil aviation airports and air navigationservices<strong>LFV</strong> shall contribute to the transport policy objectives for airtravel in an economically efficient and profitable manner byoperating and improving cost-effective, safe and well managedairports and air navigation services.Performance report requirements<strong>LFV</strong> shall report its return on equity and equity/assets ratio.• <strong>The</strong> long-term target for return on equity is that profit aftertax equivalent shall amount to 8 per cent of equity.• <strong>The</strong> 2007 target for the equity/assets ratio is 25 per cent,after which equity/assets ratio shall amount to at least 25 percent long-term.• As a restriction on price increases, traffic charges excludingair navigation charges en route, aviation security chargesand noise-related charges may increase by no more than theNet Price Index, measured starting in 2001.Performance reportReturn on equity amounted to -13 per cent.<strong>The</strong> equity/assets ratio was 19 per cent.During 2007, <strong>LFV</strong> remained below the price ceiling.An accessible transport system and favourableregional developmentAccessibility for citizens and businesses between regions and theworld at large shall be improved. <strong>The</strong> percentage of people withspecial needs who can utilise air travel shall increase. No laterthan 2010, the air transport system should be accessible topeople with disabilities.Performance report requirements<strong>LFV</strong> shall report how it takes into account the needs of peoplewith disabilities when making major changes in the terminalareas of its airports.<strong>LFV</strong> shall report how it is working to improve accessibilityfor citizens and businesses between regions and the worldat large.Performance report<strong>LFV</strong> is working to achieve the disability policy objective thatno later than 2010, the air transport system shall be accessibleto people with disabilities.As one of various examples of this work, for years there hasbeen a well-developed assistance and information service at all<strong>LFV</strong> airports.During 2006 the EU decided through a regulation(1107/2006) that responsibility for providing assistance to passengersat airports shall be transferred from airlines to airportsstarting on July 26, 2008. <strong>The</strong> regulation gives all persons withdisabilities and reduced mobility the right to assistance, regardlessof whether these conditions are due to disability, age orother factors.One of the most important requirements means that pointsof arrival shall be designated, where people with disabilities orreduced mobility can announce their arrival and request assistance.One purpose is to facilitate transfers between modes oftransport at airports.<strong>LFV</strong> believes that the regulation will result in improvedopportunities to achieve uniform high quality in the task ofassisting such passengers, while the costs will be borne equitablyby all passengers.During 2007, <strong>LFV</strong> began the task of preparing to carry outthe EU’s regulation 1107/2006 at all <strong>LFV</strong> airports.<strong>LFV</strong> pursues active aviation marketing work for the purposeof expanding its range of flight connections for passengerand cargo transport and is thereby contributing to improvingaccessibility for citizens and businesses between regionsand the world at large. During 2007, for example, this resultedin many new international routes to European destinations,three new intercontinental non-stop routes from Stockholm-Arlanda <strong>Airport</strong> and an expanded range of cargo capacity atseveral <strong>LFV</strong> airports. <strong>The</strong> bankruptcy of FlyMe, the SAS cabinstaff strike during the spring and problems during the autumnwith the Dash 8 Q400 aircraft type adversely affected frequenciesand reliability during the year. Charter flights grew at severalsmaller airports during 2007.High transport quality standardsDelays in commercial air travel shall diminish, among otherthings through improvement and efficient management ofthe State’s airport system and air navigation services.Performance report requirements<strong>LFV</strong> shall present statistics on delays in air traffic as well asan overall report on their causes. Causes that lie within <strong>LFV</strong>’ssphere of responsibility shall be reported separately. In addition,the steps that <strong>LFV</strong> has taken shall be reported.44> <strong>LFV</strong> 2007 < Performance report