Therewasnoactualdistributionstrategy.Ofcourse,Re<strong>to</strong>madeapoin<strong>to</strong>fnotstartingwiththesmallest festivals, but thinking about where he'd really like <strong>to</strong> show the film – and where itwouldfit.Inasecondstep,hewouldalsoconsidersmallerfestivals,whileheconstantlymadesurethatsomepremiererulewouldnotblockhischancesofshowingthefilm.Applying<strong>to</strong>thefestivals <strong>to</strong>ok a lot of effort at times (3 <strong>to</strong> 4 days a week); platforms such aswww.shortfilmdepot.com, www.reelport.com and www.withoutabox.com can be great timesavers.He also produced address stickers for the various application form fields, so that hewouldn'thave<strong>to</strong>fillthingsinbyhand.Re<strong>to</strong>sometimespaidtheapplicationfees–especially<strong>to</strong>themoreimportantfestivals.Forifafilmhasbeenshownsuccessfullyatalargerfestival,itisthenofteninvitedforfree<strong>to</strong>smallerfestivals.One central question was if one needs a 35mm print. Re<strong>to</strong> had decided <strong>to</strong> make his film oncelluloidforaestheticreasons.Butformanyfestivals,havinga35mmprintisnorequirementanylonger.It'sworthjustsendingaDVDforthesubmissionand<strong>to</strong>bluffabouthavinga35mmcopyintheapplication,sothatyoucanhaveaprintmadeonceyouhaveanactualinvitation.But subtitling is not something you can wait with. In this case, the film even had Germansubtitles,asitwaspartiallyspokeninSwiss‐German.Inthemeantime,8copieshavebeenmadeof“AufderStrecke”(2ofthemarearchivedattheAcademy)–usuallyoneortwocopiesshouldbe enough. Especially smaller festivals even project the film from DVD (especially during thesecondyearofexploitingthefilm).OneshouldsimplymakesurethattheDVDisgoodquality,hassubtitlesindifferentlanguages,isanamorphicandhasDolbysurround.Postcardsandothermaterialsarenotsoimportantaccording<strong>to</strong>Re<strong>to</strong>,andbelong<strong>to</strong>the“nice<strong>to</strong> have” category. In Clermont‐Ferrand, however, posters were very practical <strong>to</strong> attractattention,especiallyatthemarket.Clermon<strong>to</strong>ffersgoodopportunities<strong>to</strong>sellfilms.Therewasalso a number of lucky coincidences, which Re<strong>to</strong> had no influence on whatsoever: a noncommercialagencywasinterestedinthefilmforeducationalpurposes.Hesubsequentlygotin<strong>to</strong>uchwiththe<strong>Short</strong>FilmAgencyinHamburgforlegaladvice,andtheypromptlyacquiredthefilmthemselves–inthiswayhewasintheluckypositionthatthefilmwassoldevenbeforethefestivalinClermontstarted.Butallfestivalsthathaveamarke<strong>to</strong>ffergrea<strong>to</strong>pportunities<strong>to</strong>findabuyer.BringmanyDVDs!Intermsofagencies,Re<strong>to</strong>madeverygoodexperiences.Theseagencieshaveanetworkthatanindividualusuallydoesn'thave,andtheycanhelpoutwithlegalquestionsetc.Re<strong>to</strong>discussedtheissueofanagencyrepresentingthefilmwiththeschoolthathadproducedthefilm.Theycame <strong>to</strong> the conclusion that it would be most effective <strong>to</strong> let the Hamburg <strong>Short</strong>film Agencytake over the marketing of the film‐ and in return give them a certain percentage of therevenues.IntermsoftheOscarcampaign,Re<strong>to</strong>wasintheluckysituation<strong>to</strong>beaSwisswhostudiedinGermany,allowinghim<strong>to</strong>receivefundingfrombothcountries.Thecampaigncostabout60,000<strong>to</strong>70,000CHF:3weeks'residenceinL.A.FlightsforRe<strong>to</strong>andsomecrewmembers,onehas<strong>to</strong>
hireaPR‐agent,placeadvertisementsinthemedia(“Variety”)etc.FromRe<strong>to</strong>'spoin<strong>to</strong>fview,thisisworthit,asitcreatesthenecessaryattentionforthefilmanditalsogavehimthefeeling,thathedideverythinghecouldforthefilm.Withallitsawards,thefilmmadeabout70,000CHFincash,whilealsowinningin‐kindawardsandsupportforfutureprojects.Fromthe70,000CHF,about20,000CHFwereused<strong>to</strong>paybackdebts,20,000CHFwerepaid<strong>to</strong>thecrew,meaningthatabout30,000CHFwereleft<strong>to</strong>Re<strong>to</strong>.Giventwoandahalfyearsofworkonthefilm,thisisafairlymodestamount.TVsalesearnedanextra35,000CHF,ofwhichhalfgoes<strong>to</strong>thefilmschoolandhalf<strong>to</strong>thecrew,whichseemslikeafairdealandarecognitionfortheworkputin<strong>to</strong>thefilm.∙QuestionfromGerdGockell,filmmakerandproducer,aboutthesubmissionfees:why should filmmakers pay for their film <strong>to</strong> be shown? They hardly ever earnanything, the festivals on the other hand do. The question is mostly directed <strong>to</strong>Maike–Gerdisoftheopinionthatsubmissionfeesshouldbeabolished.∙ Answer from Maike: There are also exceptions: filmmakers they already knowareofteninvited<strong>to</strong>submittheirlatestwork–withoutbeingchargedafee.Thefeesareused<strong>to</strong>paythepeople,whopreviewandselectthefilms.Theaimis<strong>to</strong>createacontinuityintheprogramming,withpeoplestayingmorethan2yearsandformingaproperteam.Butexceptionscanbemadeintermsofsubmissionfees:anicelyformulatedlettercouldalreadyhelpyouout!∙Shaneaddsthatit'sthesameforSundance:festivalstaffdon'tgetrichfromthecontributionsoffilmmakers,andit'sup<strong>to</strong>eachfilmmaker,ifheorshewants<strong>to</strong>submitthefilmornot.Onecanalsoapplyforthefee<strong>to</strong>bewaived.ThesubmissionfeeforSundanceis50US$.∙ Shane concludes with the remark that Re<strong>to</strong> Caffi and “Auf der Strecke” are aphenomenaltext‐bookcaseofhowashortfilmshouldbemarketed,andisamarkofRe<strong>to</strong>'shardworkandtirelesscommitment–congratulations!