Research on Essence of Chicken - Mahidol University
Research on Essence of Chicken - Mahidol University
Research on Essence of Chicken - Mahidol University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The effects <strong>of</strong> BEC <strong>on</strong> EEG power SpectraGroup data (N = 48)Electrodes: F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4Link to mandible groundsTime series analysis:Periods During Eye Opened(EO) During Eye Closed (EC)1. -85 min. (before BEC ingesti<strong>on</strong>) -75 min.2. +5 min. (after BEC ingesti<strong>on</strong>) +10 min.3. +25 min. +30 min.4. +45 min. +50 min.5. +65 min. +70 min.6. +115 min. +120 min.7. +165 min. +170 min.Data from Day <strong>on</strong>e compare with Day SevenCopyright 2000 by N.Kotchabhakdi et al & <strong>Mahidol</strong>-Cerebos Collaborative <str<strong>on</strong>g>Research</str<strong>on</strong>g> ProjectA bsolute PowerPercent-chang e ACopyright 2000 by N.Kotchabhakdi et al & <strong>Mahidol</strong>-Cerebos Collaborative <str<strong>on</strong>g>Research</str<strong>on</strong>g> Project230.0220.0210.0200.0190.0180.0170.0160.0150.0140.0130.0120.0110.0100.090.080.0BEC - 2 bottles: Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta and TotalFrequency Range activity from left parietal (P3) site (E/C, LMR)*** P < 0.0010 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200Time post-ingesti<strong>on</strong> (in minutes)Delta Theta Alpha Beta TotalCopyright 2000 by N.Kotchabhakdi et al & <strong>Mahidol</strong>-Cerebos Collaborative <str<strong>on</strong>g>Research</str<strong>on</strong>g> Project20.0Day 1 Data: BEC minus PlaceboAbsolute Power Percent-Change Relative Difference: P3 site E/O LMRPositive numbers = BEC increased power > Placebo OR decreased power < PlaceboNegative numbers = Placebo increased power > BEC OR decreased power < BEC15.0ive DifferencePercent-Change Relati10.05.00.0-5.0-10.0-15.0-20.0Delta Theta Alpha Beta TotalFrequency BandGeissler C et al Nutriti<strong>on</strong> Reports Internati<strong>on</strong>al March 1989 Vol. 39 No. 3ive DifferencePercent-Change Relati20.015.010.05.00.0-5.0-10.0-15.0-20.0Copyright 2000 by N.Kotchabhakdi et al & <strong>Mahidol</strong>-Cerebos Collaborative <str<strong>on</strong>g>Research</str<strong>on</strong>g> ProjectDay 1 Data: BEC minus PlaceboAbsolute Power Percent-Change Relative Difference: P4 site E/O LMRPositive numbers = BEC increased power > Placebo OR decreased power < PlaceboNegative numbers = Placebo increased power > BEC OR decreased power < BECDelta Theta Alpha Beta TotalFrequency BandCopyright 2000 by N.Kotchabhakdi et al & <strong>Mahidol</strong>-Cerebos Collaborative <str<strong>on</strong>g>Research</str<strong>on</strong>g> ProjectAbsolute PowerPercent-chang e in230.0220.0210.0200.0190.0180.0170.0160.0150.0140.0130.0120.0110.0100.090.0Comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> BEC: 1 vs 2 bottles:Alpha activity from parietal electrodes (E/C, LMR)*** P < 0.001BEC-1 P3BEC-2 P3BEC-1 P4BEC-2 P480.00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200Time post-ingesti<strong>on</strong> (in minutes)
Change language