Summary - People.stat.sfu.ca - Simon Fraser University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 2a. An illustration of a model fit (Probit, Separate, NoNR, NoRE) where the effectof hardness is not monotonic. This is the fit for the NA-TA-mortality data. The doseresponse curve at hardness 15 leads to a lower apparent mortality than the same sulphatedose at hardness 80. The Probit, Separate, NoNR, NoRE model does not enforce“protective” effects of hardness.
Figure 2b. The Probit, SeparateMono, NoNR, NoRE model fit to the NA-TA-mortalitydata.
Page 1 and 2: An assessment of the effect of hard
Page 3 and 4: 2. Studies used. There are two gr
Page 5 and 6: number of free parameters in the mo
Page 7 and 8: isotonicity constraint can be appli
Page 9 and 10: fewer mortalities occurred at highe
Page 11 and 12: Survival10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.
Page 13 and 14: is inconsequential relative to the
Page 18 and 19: The function fit isA(1+ E • X)Y =
Page 20 and 21: In some cases, model averaged estim
Page 22 and 23: experimental studies of quantal res
Page 24 and 25: Figure 1b. The Probit, Separate, CN
Page 26: Figure 1d. The Probit, Common LC50,
Page 29: Figure 1g. The Probit, Common, CNR,
Page 33 and 34: Table 1. Summary of sampling protoc
Page 35 and 36: Table 2-EC-CH-mortality. Summary of
Page 37 and 38: Table 2-EC-FH-weight. Summary of AI
Page 39 and 40: Table 2-EC-HY-weight. Summary of AI
Page 42 and 43: Table EC-MY-mortality. Summary of A
Page 44 and 45: Table 2-NA-AL-cell. Summary of AIC
Page 46 and 47: Table 2-NA-DA-repro. Summary of mod
Page 48 and 49: Table 2-NA-FH-weight. Summary of AI
Page 51: Table 2-NA-TA-weight. Summary of mo
Page 54 and 55: Table 3. Summary of model averaged
Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Summary of model averaged

Summary - People.stat.sfu.ca - Simon Fraser University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?