Summary - People.stat.sfu.ca - Simon Fraser University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3. <strong>Summary</strong> of model averaged LCxx/ICxx values. Estimates that are far outside the range of the observed doses are not reported.MAestMAseBMDLC/IC 10 LC/IC 25 LC/IC 50MALCLMAUCLMAestMAseMALCLMAUCLMAestMAseMALCLMAUCL80 1330 262 904 1958 1845 246 1421 2396 2559 290 2049 3195160 2102 523 1291 3423 2809 483 2006 3933 3752 568 2789 5048320 3041 535 2154 4294 716 4409 0 1.241E8 4304 2095 1658 11175RO growth 40 731 333 300 1786 996 279 575 1725 1213 295 754 195380 347 304 63 1927 1797 774 772 4182 2191 528 1366 3513160 734 321 312 1729 1304 1485 140 12154 2235 424 1541 3242320 848 938 97 7420 1070 1955 30 38443 1915 3049 84 43401TA mortality 15 648 209 345 1218 1109 228 741 1658 1963 459 1242 310480 186 99 65 531 554 170 304 1009 1868 551 1047 3330weight 15 1246 469 596 2604 1441 320 932 2228 1828 95 1651 202580 1276 428 662 2462 1385 332 866 2214 1577 269 1128 2204
Report ResponseTable 4. Example of model averaging for estimates of LC10 for Rainbow Trout at hardness 50 conducted by EC.Species Model EstimateStandardError AICcDeltaAICcAICweightModelAverageEstimateModelAverageSE95%cilowerboundEC mortality RT Probit, Common, CNR, RE 5.03 0.42 345.1 0.0 0.51 . . . .EC mortality RT Probit, SeparateMono, CNR,RE95%ciupperbound4.60 0.49 345.5 0.4 0.41 . . . .EC mortality RT Probit, Separate, CNR, RE 4.73 0.55 350.7 5.6 0.03 . . . .EC mortality RT Probit, CommonLC 10 ,SNR, REEC mortality RT Probit, CommonLC 25 ,SNR, REEC mortality RT Probit, CommonLC 50 ,SNR, RE4.99 0.41 351.0 5.9 0.03 . . . .5.22 0.45 352.2 7.1 0.01 . . . .4.97 0.86 353.4 8.3 0.01 . . . .EC mortality RT Probit, Separate, SNR, RE 4.84 0.58 356.3 11.2 0.00 . . . .EC mortality RT 99-Model Averaged . . . . . 4.84 0.51 3.85 5.84EC mortality RT 99-Model Averaged onantilog. . . . . 127 64 47 342
Page 1 and 2:
An assessment of the effect of hard
Page 3 and 4:
2. Studies used. There are two gr
Page 5 and 6: number of free parameters in the mo
Page 7 and 8: isotonicity constraint can be appli
Page 9 and 10: fewer mortalities occurred at highe
Page 11 and 12: Survival10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.
Page 13 and 14: is inconsequential relative to the
Page 18 and 19: The function fit isA(1+ E • X)Y =
Page 20 and 21: In some cases, model averaged estim
Page 22 and 23: experimental studies of quantal res
Page 24 and 25: Figure 1b. The Probit, Separate, CN
Page 26: Figure 1d. The Probit, Common LC50,
Page 29 and 30: Figure 1g. The Probit, Common, CNR,
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2b. The Probit, SeparateMono
Page 33 and 34: Table 1. Summary of sampling protoc
Page 35 and 36: Table 2-EC-CH-mortality. Summary of
Page 37 and 38: Table 2-EC-FH-weight. Summary of AI
Page 39 and 40: Table 2-EC-HY-weight. Summary of AI
Page 42 and 43: Table EC-MY-mortality. Summary of A
Page 44 and 45: Table 2-NA-AL-cell. Summary of AIC
Page 46 and 47: Table 2-NA-DA-repro. Summary of mod
Page 48 and 49: Table 2-NA-FH-weight. Summary of AI
Page 51: Table 2-NA-TA-weight. Summary of mo
Page 54 and 55: Table 3. Summary of model averaged
show all

Summary - People.stat.sfu.ca - Simon Fraser University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?