Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Response to Cyclone Nargis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Key Issue forevaluationLead Questions/Detailed Enquiry areasAre there examples of unusualcollaboration and/or creativepartnerships at the local, national andinternational level? How are ASEANand the TCG facilitating thehumanitarian/early recovery endeavor?How have local organizations beeninvolved in the response? Is it likely toreflect a strengthening over time ofcivil society? What mechanisms are inplace, or are in the process of being putinto place, to ensuresustainability/connectedness ofoperations upon withdrawal/departureof international staff?In the transition to early recovery, howhave early recovery plans beenintegrated into the humanitarianresponse?What has the been the effect of therestrictions on recruitment of anddeployment of international staff onoperations, and what have been/are thestrategic implications of the rapid scaleup?Source/Technique for gatheringinfo.TCG members, donors, privatesector, operationalorganizations.National NGOs, FG withbeneficiaries, national staff ofUN and NGOs.Cluster leads, UNDP, donors.Operational organizations.3. Coordinationand PartnershipsHow are communications andmessaging being managed by thehumanitarian community? Is there aunified voice?How might the clusters and technicalworking groups be rationalized to allowfor more effective time management?What is the quality of partnerships,particularly the involvement of INGOs,NGOs, donors, and the government, inplanning, prioritizing, mobilizingresources and identifying needs?What is the role of the central clusterand regional entities, especially whenthey are not sitting in the affected area?What is the role at the local level andhow are they linked?PI staff, senior coordinators,donors, FG beneficiaries.Cluster leads and participants.Cluster leads, coordinators,NGO and local NGO managers.Regional coordinators, clusterleads, hub coordinators.52
4. TimetableDateActivitySept 17 - 28 Consultant orientation, initial document review & finalization of TORSept 28 - Oct 3 Travel to Bangkok. Interviews with regional offices.Oct 4 -9 Interviews in Yangon and completion of inception reportOct 10 - 20 Interviews and focus groups in affected areasOct 21 – 23 Final interviews and workshops in Yangon. Debrief/verification meetings withUNCT and IASC.Oct 24 Debriefing in BangkokNov 1. Fact checking of draft zero reportNov 7/8 Debriefings Geneva and New YorkNov.7Draft report for comment14 November Final report submitted53
Page 1: Inter-Agency RealTime Evaluation of
Page 4 and 5: AcknowledgmentsThe IA RTE team woul
Page 7 and 8: While the cluster system was seen a
Page 9 and 10: R.13. Local Resource Centers, based
Page 11 and 12: individuals responding without any
Page 13 and 14: According to a recent ICG report,
Page 15 and 16: 3 Findings and Recommendations3.1 C
Page 17 and 18: 3.2 AssessmentThe Post-Nargis Joint
Page 19 and 20: virtually all communities in the wo
Page 21 and 22: season, which impacts a number of c
Page 23 and 24: OCHA on how to support MIMU caused
Page 25 and 26: 3.10 CommunicationsLargely due to r
Page 27 and 28: Findings on cluster coordination ar
Page 29 and 30: Many local organizations, particula
Page 31 and 32: Annex 1: MethodologyIA RTE Approach
Page 33 and 34: a. Length and nature of experience
Page 35: team to test these hypotheses throu
Page 38 and 39: 8-Oct Julie Belanger F RC/HC Respon
Page 40 and 41: 21-Oct LNGO Validation Workshop Yan
Page 42 and 43: for $481.8 million.projects. 19Whil
Page 44 and 45: and whether it is something that ca
Page 46 and 47: Duration of Evaluation and Tentativ
Page 48 and 49: Annex 4: Inception Report1. Objecti
Page 50 and 51: • A review of relevant documents,
Page 54 and 55: Annex 5:Current Clusters and Techni
Page 56: Maurice Herson: Real-Time Evaluatio

Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Response to Cyclone Nargis

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?