12.07.2015 Views

Read the full report - Danish Refugee Council

Read the full report - Danish Refugee Council

Read the full report - Danish Refugee Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CASH PROGRAMME REVIEW FOR IDPs IN KABUL INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS 11The goal of DRC’s work in Afghanistan is to promote durable solutions to refugee and displacementproblems, on <strong>the</strong> basis of humanitarian principles and human rights. In Afghanistan, DRC focusesmainly on livelihood and infrastructure support to <strong>the</strong> increasing number of returnees and IDPssquatting in <strong>the</strong> slum areas of Kabul. Through a participatory and community based approach, DRCalso aims at enhancing <strong>the</strong> protection capacities of urban communities hosting IDPs and returnees.The organization is expanding its livelihoods programs regionally, streng<strong>the</strong>ning its cross-borderinitiatives to not only solve <strong>the</strong> problems of IDPs and returnees in Afghanistan, but to provide alonger-term view of protection and livelihoods response prior to displacement and upon return. Inthis effort, DRC is looking into ways to improve its programming – notably by commissioning SamuelHall to undertake this research on <strong>the</strong> potential use of cash programming in <strong>the</strong> Kabul InformalSettlements.This is <strong>the</strong> fourth research study conducted by Samuel Hall on internal displacement in Afghanistan 4 .This series of field-based research studies provide strong evidence to cover <strong>the</strong> needs of IDPs inAfghanistan – whe<strong>the</strong>r from a poverty perspective, from a protection angle, or more recently with ourspecific programming and operational recommendations for organisations like Solidarités, NRC andDRC. Samuel Hall is taking on this study for two reasons – first as it touches upon one of <strong>the</strong> keypopulations of concern for humanitarian actors in Afghanistan: IDPs; second, as it adds knowledge,and will provide answers, to some of <strong>the</strong> bigger humanitarian debates currently existing inAfghanistan, namely whe<strong>the</strong>r cash assistance, in-kind assistance or a combination of both is <strong>the</strong>most adequate method of providing aid to vulnerable populations.To deepen <strong>the</strong>se key aspects of today and tomorrow’s debates on assistance in Afghanistan, thisresearch study will fulfil <strong>the</strong> following objectives:i. Assessment of <strong>the</strong> needs of IDPs, including vulnerability, seasonality, with a specific Age,Gender and Diversity approach, a market study and a review of cash programsii.iii.Identification of <strong>the</strong> risks and protection issues for a cash approach, and <strong>the</strong>ir mitigationincluding when and when not to use a cash approachAssessment of <strong>the</strong> viability of a cash approach for winter-related risk mitigation.MethodologyTo reach <strong>the</strong>se objectives, <strong>the</strong> research team designed a methodology based on secondary researchand desk review, quantitative survey of IDP households in <strong>the</strong> KIS, and qualitative fieldwork.1. Secondary research and Desk reviewA review of <strong>the</strong>oretical and empirical research on cash-based programs across countries wasconducted, summarizing <strong>the</strong> results of recent research, best practices in o<strong>the</strong>r countries, andsources of disagreement/consensus on cash assistance among development researchers, in order toidentify <strong>the</strong> important aspects of cash programming and existing practices in Afghanistan. A deskbasedreview of all <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>report</strong>s and documents on internal displacement and on cash transferprogrammes (CTP) in Afghanistan was conducted to narrow down <strong>the</strong> scope of work, including <strong>the</strong>review and assessment of official <strong>report</strong>s, available sources and <strong>the</strong> history and trends of CTPindicators used in programming efforts by DRC and different stakeholders in Afghanistan – whe<strong>the</strong>rgovernmental or non-governmental, international or national stakeholders, practitioners or donors.4 NRC/IDMC/JIPS/SAMUEL HALL CONSULTING (2012), Challenges of IDP protection in Afghanistan: Research study on <strong>the</strong>protection of internally displaced persons in Afghanistan.SAMUEL HALL CONSULTING (2012), Sustaining <strong>the</strong> Working Poor in <strong>the</strong> Kabul Informal Settlements, Solidarités International.World Bank/ UNHCR (2011), Samuel Hall, Research Study on IDPs in Urban Settings.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!