Cargo facilitation3.31Government inspection <strong>services</strong> for cargoACI POLICY3.31.1 Government inspection <strong>services</strong>for cargo should be available <strong>and</strong>adequate to facilitate the expeditiousclearance of cargo consignments.ACI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE / COMMENT<strong>International</strong> air cargo hub operations have evolved into a 24 hour per day, 7 dayper week business, <strong>and</strong> the air cargo industry is catering for increasingly timesensitiveshipments. The “just-in-time” concept has given rise to the need forfast, cost-effective <strong>and</strong> seamless transport chains. Moreover, the rapid growth oftraffic in perishable cargo creates a requirement for the streamlining ofprocedures, not only for the physical h<strong>and</strong>ling of goods, but also for the timelyinspection <strong>and</strong> release of cargo. Governments should move to enhance thespeed advantage of air cargo by making available government inspection<strong>services</strong> whenever they are needed.ACI believes that compatibility must exist between the requirements of therelevant government inspection agencies at the origin <strong>and</strong> destination of aconsignment. Procedures related to the movement of air cargo, as well as thoserelated to intermodal transportation (air, sea, rail <strong>and</strong> road), must be developedon an international level to allow for the st<strong>and</strong>ardization of documentation <strong>and</strong>h<strong>and</strong>ling methods. These procedures should recognize the desirability of theeventual replacement of processes now in existence in favour of automation <strong>and</strong>a paperless environment.Governments should also encourage the development of internationalcommunications networks allowing for the transmission of data betweengovernmental agencies within a country <strong>and</strong> between countries. At <strong>airport</strong>swhere there is a lack of capacity for expansion, the <strong>airport</strong> operator may wish todevelop off-<strong>airport</strong> facilities for initial acceptance, storage, distribution,consolidation, de-consolidation <strong>and</strong> final receipt <strong>and</strong> clearance of goods. In thesecases, the cooperation of control authorities is sought to facilitate theestablishment of off-<strong>airport</strong> clearance <strong>and</strong> storage facilities for bonded goods.3.32Maximum clearance time for arriving cargoACI POLICY3.32.1 Maximum clearance times fordifferent categories of cargo should beestablished by the customs authorities,in consultation with <strong>airport</strong>s <strong>and</strong>airlines, <strong>and</strong> should meet or better therecommended performance st<strong>and</strong>ardsin Annex 9.ACI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE / COMMENTACI supports ICAO Annex 9 Recommended Practice 4.29 establishing a targetCustoms clearance time of three hours for arriving general cargo not requiringexamination, from the time proper documentation or a legally acceptableelectronic equivalent is presented. In line with ICAO Annex 9, St<strong>and</strong>ards 4.25 to4.27, shipments such as perishable goods, live animals, personal effects <strong>and</strong>low-value goods should be cleared promptly on arrival. As provided under ICAOAnnex 9, Recommended Practice 4.28, goods imported by authorised importerswho have demonstrated compliance with Customs regulations <strong>and</strong> who supplyadvance information, should be released immediately on arrival.ACI recommends that physical examination of cargo by Customs should alwaysbe based on targeting <strong>and</strong> risk assessment criteria.ACI Policy <strong>and</strong> Recommended Practices H<strong>and</strong>book | Seventh Edition | November 2009 Section 3 | Page 16
3.33Elimination of the paper cargo manifest <strong>and</strong> of paper air waybill, <strong>and</strong> use ofElectronic Data Interchange (EDI)ACI POLICY3.33.1 State authorities should reduceor eliminate the requirements for hardcopy manifests or air waybills <strong>and</strong>leverage EDI <strong>and</strong> new technologies tofacilitate the more expeditiousprocessing <strong>and</strong> clearance of cargo.ACI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE / COMMENTCargo manifests are unnecessary, since the same information can readily beobtained from air waybills in either paper or electronic form. The use ofElectronic Data Interchange (EDI) for the submission of waybill information hassignificant cost <strong>and</strong> facilitation benefits for all parties involved in the cargoprocess. A further benefit is that information on incoming goods can be obtainedby Customs in advance of the arrival of the aircraft. Existing UN/EDIFACTst<strong>and</strong>ards for EDI messages should be used (see ICAO Annex 9, St<strong>and</strong>ard4.15).Whether information appears in the cargo manifest or in air waybills, it isessential to limit the description of the nature of goods to the 15 characters setaside for this purpose. The use of more than one line of information per shipmentis contrary to the goal of facilitation.ACI supports Montreal Protocol no. 4, which entered into force in 1998, <strong>and</strong>provides a statutory basis for electronic submission of air waybills. It would behelpful if the number of signatory States would increase.3.34Release of documented partial shipmentsACI POLICY3.34.1 Part-shipments of cargo shouldbe released when the completedocumentation for any such partshipmenthas been presented.ACI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE / COMMENTACI supports ICAO Recommended Practice 4.30, that part-shipments should bereleased when the complete documentation for any such part-shipment has beenpresented. This is expected to end the practice previously followed by someCustoms authorities of holding part-shipments in bond until all the missing partsof the shipment have arrived, even though the part-shipment is documented.3.35Release of operators of cargo facilities from liabilityACI POLICY3.35.1 Governments should absolveboth airlines <strong>and</strong> <strong>airport</strong> operators orcargo warehouse operators fromliability for customs duties, taxes <strong>and</strong>other charges at such time as goodsare transferred, with the approval of theauthorities, into the possession of athird party.ACI RECOMMENDED PRACTICE / COMMENTACI believes that this release from liability should apply regardless of whetherthe third party has a security or guarantee on file with the customs authorities.ACI Policy <strong>and</strong> Recommended Practices H<strong>and</strong>book | Seventh Edition | November 2009 Section 3 | Page 17