13.07.2015 Views

PhD thesis final - Royal Holloway, University of London

PhD thesis final - Royal Holloway, University of London

PhD thesis final - Royal Holloway, University of London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2- Conceptual frameworkalso Blunt and Varley 2004), but also reveals the complexities, conflicts andcompromises involved in creating a home (Daniels, cited in Blunt and Dowling2006:23). Concerning the multi-scalar understanding <strong>of</strong> home, the discussion <strong>of</strong>migrants‘ practices in forging a sense <strong>of</strong> being at home should also include thoseexperiences that take place in other spatial settings in which their everyday lives arebased. In this regard, my analysis will examine Taiwanese expatriates‘ everyday living,including domestic lives, work and leisure activities, and consider how the materiality<strong>of</strong> their living spaces affects their emotional experiences <strong>of</strong> belonging. Drawing uponboth the private and public domains <strong>of</strong> migrants‘ daily lives, my investigation adds toexisting understanding <strong>of</strong> material culture in migrants‘ practices to constitute belongingin the domestic space as well as the private domain. My discussion also addresses themateriality that helps to create a virtual form <strong>of</strong> space <strong>of</strong> belonging (i.e. in Cyberspace),with special attention paid to the transnational media and telecommunicationstechnology; in doing so, my research can also add to the literature on spaces <strong>of</strong> publicbelonging.A public space can be potential space <strong>of</strong> belonging for migrants partially because itsphysical forms or built components <strong>of</strong> landscapes, such as the housing style (Blunt andDowling 2006; Westwood and Phizacklea 2000) and surroundings (e.g. theinfrastructure and amenities) (for example, see Beaverstock 2002; Gordon 2008) canmake migrants feel a sense <strong>of</strong> transnational similarity and familiarity. What is lessdiscussed in the literature is the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> materiality <strong>of</strong> public spaces that migrantsexperience in their everyday lives, such as objects deployed and used as integral parts <strong>of</strong>the built spatial structures. This deficiency in the literature will also be examined in thisresearch, with special attention paid to the material culture which makes up thelandscape <strong>of</strong> vision, sound, smell and tastes that migrants experience in workplace and45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!