13.07.2015 Views

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1993

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1993

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 1993

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 <strong>1993</strong> MINUTES OF THE SYNOD OF THEBruce Stewart led in prayer as <strong>Synod</strong> took recess at 4:30 p.m.THURSDAY, JULY 15,<strong>1993</strong>,7:00 P.M.<strong>Synod</strong> reconvened at 7:00 p.m. singing Psalm 122B and being ledin prayer by Ed Hindman.The roll was passed.The minutes <strong>of</strong> the Thursday afternoon meeting were read andapproved.The report <strong>of</strong> the Committee to Resolve the Impasse on OrdinationQuery #8 was taken up. Item 5 was amended and adopted as amended.Item 6 was adopted.It was moved, seconded and carried that the following statementconcerning the vote on item 4 <strong>of</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> the Committee to Resolvethe Impasse on Ordination Query #8 be included in the <strong>Minutes</strong> asfollows:While we believe that the Scriptures clearly warn against the dan<strong>of</strong> beverage alcohol, and while we hold that an elder should not use orencourage the use <strong>of</strong> alcohol or any other mind-altering drugs, and whilewe believe it would be more consistent for the church to maintain this standby keeping present Query #8 we recognize that a majority <strong>of</strong> our brothersin <strong>Synod</strong> do not hold this position.Therefore, in order to promote the peace and unity <strong>of</strong> the church, andto help to resolve the frustration felt because <strong>of</strong> the impasse on Query #8,we want to record that we abstained from voting on the proposed changesin ordination queries.Bruce C. StewartRobert B. McCrackenRobert McCracken read a further statement on the matter asfollows:In <strong>Synod</strong>'s vote on Recommendation #4,1 chose to abstain from votiand desire to explain my rationale.I could not in good conscience vote for removal <strong>of</strong> total abstinence fromQuery #8 because I believe the Scripture supports the necessity <strong>of</strong> thisrequirement for <strong>of</strong>ficers in Christ's church in America today.However I felt I could not vote against this recommendation becausedoing so might further complicate the impasse which has divided the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!