the State. The l<strong>and</strong>owners in their individual l<strong>and</strong>s have permanent <strong>and</strong> heritabletransferable rights over the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> its use. L<strong>and</strong> ceiling has been imposed wherein amaximum of five ha of irrigated l<strong>and</strong> can be owned by a family of five members <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>each additional member of the family 1/2 ha may be owned. The ceiling is 10 ha, in caseof non-irrigated l<strong>and</strong>. This Act also prohibits transfer of tribal l<strong>and</strong> to a non-tribal <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong> rights are thus acquired by (1) inheritance (2) transfer (3) allotment of new l<strong>and</strong> byGovernment. Transfer of l<strong>and</strong> owned by tribal to a non-tribal may be possible only afterpermission from the Deputy Commissioner <strong>and</strong> consent of the District council. However,M.L.R. & L.R. Act, 1960 does not apply to hill areas where 70% of the <strong>for</strong>ests arelocated. The l<strong>and</strong> tenure system in these hill villages is governed by the customs <strong>and</strong>traditions of the tribes that inhabit such areas <strong>and</strong> these are basically of two broad typesviz. Naga <strong>and</strong> Kuki. However, there is one common factor, that the rights over l<strong>and</strong> canbe acquired by clearing jungles, in addition to acquisition through inheritance <strong>and</strong>transfer.In Meghalaya, 72.98% of the l<strong>and</strong> of the State falls under community ownership. Thisalso includes clan l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> “rikynti” l<strong>and</strong>, which are not strictly community l<strong>and</strong>. Therest consist of l<strong>and</strong> acquired by the Government <strong>for</strong> its establishment <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> assessed<strong>for</strong> l<strong>and</strong> revenue, which includes towns, bazaar l<strong>and</strong>, homestead l<strong>and</strong>, basti or paddyl<strong>and</strong>s, etc. The l<strong>and</strong> tenure system is different from district to district <strong>and</strong> each of the predominanttribal community follows its own traditional system. In the Khasi Hills, onecategory of l<strong>and</strong> belongs to the community, <strong>and</strong> even if a member has a right to occupy aportion of the l<strong>and</strong>, he has no transferable right. In the second category, l<strong>and</strong> is set apartexclusively <strong>for</strong> certain clans, specially the original founders of villages. Such clans enjoyabsolute right of occupancy of the l<strong>and</strong> as well as heritable <strong>and</strong> transferable rights. In theJantia hills, the Government did not recognise private ownership of high l<strong>and</strong>s, butallowed anyone to cultivate them.In the Garo hills, there are two types of l<strong>and</strong> tenure systems. In one category i.e. “akhing”l<strong>and</strong>, the individual families have only temporary right <strong>for</strong> cultivation. In the othercategory, which are basically l<strong>and</strong>s in the plains, permanent cultivation is allowed. Allthese l<strong>and</strong>s are assessed <strong>for</strong> l<strong>and</strong> revenue, the rate of which is fixed either permanently ortemporarily <strong>for</strong> a period.In Mizoram, about 51% of the <strong>for</strong>ests are unclassified <strong>and</strong> 11% of the <strong>for</strong>est area iscontrolled by the District Council. Most of the unclassified <strong>for</strong>ests are owned by theVillage Councils. Parts of these <strong>for</strong>ests are kept as village safety <strong>and</strong> supply reserves <strong>and</strong>in rest of the areas of <strong>for</strong>ests, Jhuming is extensively practised. No systematic survey <strong>and</strong>demarcation has so far been carried out in Mizoram. By <strong>and</strong> large almost the entire <strong>for</strong>estareas have been affected in the past by Jhuming; resulting in clearance of primary treecover <strong>and</strong> .leading to degradation of l<strong>and</strong>, except in the southeastern part of the Lungleidistrict <strong>and</strong> southern parts of Chhimtuipui district. L<strong>and</strong> rights accrue on permanentoccupancy of either agricultural or residential areas, especially in wet rice cultivation,terraced rice cultivation <strong>and</strong> fruit plantation in permanent plots. The Jhumias do not havesuch rights. The jhum l<strong>and</strong>s being property of village community, the ownership of suchl<strong>and</strong> is shared amongst the community. The ownership during the period of cultivation isdecided by a lottery once in a year.150
In Nagal<strong>and</strong>, about 93% of the total <strong>for</strong>est areas is still unclassified. In most of the tribalgroups immovable l<strong>and</strong>ed properties are recognised in four categories. (1) private l<strong>and</strong>(2) clan l<strong>and</strong> (3) morung l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> (4) common village l<strong>and</strong>. Most of the unclassified<strong>for</strong>ests belong to any of these categories. The jhum l<strong>and</strong> does not belong to individuals. Itis the property of entire community <strong>and</strong> the people living in the village. The Naga JhumL<strong>and</strong> Regulation Act 1946, gave the original inhabitants absolute right over their jhuml<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> recognised their eligibility <strong>for</strong> the practice of shifting cultivation, grazing ofcattle, etc. Naga Forest Act, 1968 gives the Government absolute right to carve out <strong>for</strong>estreserves <strong>and</strong> acquire any plot of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> its purpose.In Tripura, about 29% of the Forest area is still unclassified. In 1960, the Tripura L<strong>and</strong>Revenue <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Re<strong>for</strong>ms Act was passed, which declares that all l<strong>and</strong>s which are notthe property of any person are the property of the State. This Act abolished theintermediary rights bringing the raiyats into direct contact with the State. The raiyats areentitled to construct buildings, wells, tanks, etc., <strong>and</strong> improve the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> bettercultivation. Under this Act, there is also l<strong>and</strong> ceiling based on family size. For a family ofone person the ceiling is 2 ha If a family consists of 5 members the limit is 4 ha In case ofmore members in the family, <strong>for</strong> each additional member 0.6 ha is granted, subject to aceiling of 7.2 ha Transfer of l<strong>and</strong> by a tribal to non-tribal is not valid unless thetransaction has the written consent of the Collector.The rights <strong>and</strong> concessions in the North-East region also go mostly by tradition <strong>and</strong>precedence. There has been little codification of such rights <strong>and</strong> concessions beingenjoyed by the people of the region, particularly the tribals. There exists a distinctundercurrent of opinion within the individuals, communities <strong>and</strong> District Councils tointerpret any order banning the use of l<strong>and</strong>, extraction of <strong>for</strong>est produce as aimed, at notonly the livelihood security but the ethnic identity <strong>and</strong> aspiration of the population. Often,they refer to the Article 371 <strong>and</strong> Article 244 (VI Schedule) of the Constitution as asupport to their absolute ownership <strong>and</strong> right to use the l<strong>and</strong>. However, the relevantclauses in 6th schedule give the local people the right to manage the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>estproduce <strong>and</strong> most people in the North-East have been noted to manage the <strong>for</strong>estresources in a sustainable manner.10.2.2 Legal AspectsThe application of Acts of Parliament to the various States in the North-East vary fromState to State, <strong>and</strong> sometimes from district to district within the same State.The two main provisions which govern the applicability of Acts of Parliament <strong>and</strong> theState Legislature to the Northeastern region are Article 371 <strong>and</strong> 244 of the Constitution.In so far as the State of Nagal<strong>and</strong> is concerned, Article 371 A of the Constitution statesthat "No Act of Parliament in respect of:-(a) Religious or social practices of the Nagas,(b) Naga customary law <strong>and</strong> procedures,(c)Administration of civil <strong>and</strong> criminal justice involving decisions according to Nagacustomary law <strong>and</strong>151