- Page 2 and 3:
LAKE POCOTOPAUGLAKE AND WATERSHEDRE
- Page 4 and 5:
11.3 Prevent algal blooms from occu
- Page 6 and 7:
LAYPERSON’S SYNOPSISLake Pocotopa
- Page 8 and 9:
The stocking of walleye in Lake Poc
- Page 10 and 11:
Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
- Page 12 and 13:
Period Covered 1988• Pollution fr
- Page 14 and 15:
Recommendations included• Algacid
- Page 16 and 17:
Major EventDecember 1999 - Fish kil
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 5. Land Use from the CT DEP G
- Page 20 and 21:
Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
- Page 22 and 23:
Figure 4. Lake Pocotopaug Bathymetr
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 6. QA/QC on Water Quality Dat
- Page 26 and 27:
Soils - USDA at MAGIC UCONN Geograp
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 8. Water Quality Variables Me
- Page 30 and 31:
Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
- Page 32 and 33:
Phytoplankton samples were collecte
- Page 34 and 35:
where many measurements would have
- Page 36 and 37:
Figure 7. 2001 Temperature and Diss
- Page 38 and 39:
Table 10 continued. 2001 Lake Pocot
- Page 40 and 41:
phytoplankton biomass (Wetzel 1983)
- Page 42 and 43:
Figure 9. Annual June, July and Aug
- Page 44 and 45:
elow 7:1 occurred on September 22,
- Page 46 and 47:
Table 12. 2001 Dry and Wet Weather
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
- Page 52 and 53:
Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
- Page 56 and 57:
were identified to genus and enumer
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
- Page 60 and 61:
Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
- Page 66 and 67:
Table 14 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
- Page 68 and 69:
Figure 10. 2001 Phytoplankton Bioma
- Page 70 and 71:
The late summer bloom of blue-green
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 15. 2001 Zooplankton DensityZ
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 16. 2001 Zooplankton BiomassZ
- Page 76 and 77:
7.0 RELATIONSHIPS AND TRENDS7.1 Pre
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 13. 1991-2001 Surface Water
- Page 80 and 81:
Figure 15. 2001 Surface and Mid-dep
- Page 82 and 83:
Figure 16. 1991-2001 Chlorophyll a
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 18. 2001 Chlorophyll a vs. S
- Page 86 and 87:
Figure 20. 1991-2001 July and Augus
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 17. Empirical Model Calculati
- Page 90 and 91:
Table 18. Total Phosphorus Loading
- Page 92 and 93: Table 19. Wet Weather Loading Summa
- Page 94 and 95: With the best possible treatment of
- Page 96 and 97: water quality should focus on input
- Page 98 and 99: 10.0 MANAGEMENT NEEDS AND OBJECTIVE
- Page 100 and 101: 11.2 Reducing Total Phosphorus and
- Page 102 and 103: undeveloped forest land, an opportu
- Page 104 and 105: Figure 22. Buffer Strips for Pollut
- Page 106 and 107: Figure 23. Catch Basin with Sump an
- Page 108 and 109: early spring to capture what appear
- Page 110 and 111: Figure 26. Infiltration Systems.Lak
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 27. Constructed Treatment We
- Page 114 and 115: Chemical TreatmentIn-stream chemica
- Page 116 and 117: TABLE 21. MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR CO
- Page 118 and 119: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 120 and 121: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 122 and 123: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 124 and 125: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 126 and 127: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 128 and 129: TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
- Page 130 and 131: 12.0 ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDSManagemen
- Page 132 and 133: 13.0 RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
- Page 134 and 135: this point, but as a rough guide, a
- Page 136 and 137: 14.0 REFERENCESAd Hoc Lake Advisory
- Page 138 and 139: Scheuler T.R., P.A. Kumble, & M.A.
- Page 140 and 141: Appendix B:Supplemental Tables and