Lake Pocotopaug Lake and Watershed Restoration Evaluation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplankton Density.PHYTOPLANKTON DENSITY (CELLS/ML)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(1.5m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(1.5m)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(2.8m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(2.6m)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(2.6m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(2.3m)TAXON 10/31/01 10/31/01 10/31/01 10/31/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 12/28/01 12/28/01 12/28/01 12/28/01CHLOROPHYTAElakatothrix 52 29 24 32 60 150 0 108 88 88 102 0Golenkinia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Kirchneriella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Micractinium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Oocystis 104 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pediastrum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Quadrigula 208 116 96 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Scenedesmus 0 0 48 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0Schroederia 0 0 0 0 30 150 27 27 0 88 0 63Sphaerocystis 208 232 192 0 5760 3900 432 5184 1056 704 408 756Staurastrum 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0Staurodesmus 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0CHRYSOPHYTACentritractus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63Dinobryon 52 116 48 16 60 75 27 27 220 264 51 63Mallomonas 130 116 96 192 0 0 54 27 1408 1760 1275 2331Ochromonas 208 319 264 208 150 2025 1809 2484 2376 2200 3978 1953Synura 0 0 0 0 30 0 27 27 44 44 0 0Flagellated coccoid golden 0 0 0 0 630 0 81 54 132 132 255 126CRYPTOPHYTACryptomonas 1092 1885 888 1088 90 675 189 378 572 440 867 882CYANOPHYTAAnabaena spp. 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Anabaena aphanizomenoides 1300 870 960 608 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluation 56May 2002
Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplankton Density.PHYTOPLANKTON DENSITY (CELLS/ML)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(1.5m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(1.5m)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(2.8m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(2.6m)LP-1(0.2m)LP-1(2.6m)LP-2(0.2m)LP-2(2.3m)TAXON 10/31/01 10/31/01 10/31/01 10/31/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 11/27/01 12/28/01 12/28/01 12/28/01 12/28/01CYANOPHYTAAphanizomenon 1040 0 600 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Aphanocapsa 0 0 960 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Chroococcus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Dactylococcopsis 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lyngbya limnetica 2600 0 0 0 0 1500 1080 540 880 0 0 0Microcystis 1300 0 720 1280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Oscillatoria 520 1160 960 640 0 0 0 0 0 0 1020 0EUGLENOPHYTATrachelomonas 52 29 72 16 60 0 27 0 0 44 0 0PYRRHOPHYTACeratium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Peridinium 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RHODOPHYTALake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluation 57May 2002
Page 2 and 3:
LAKE POCOTOPAUGLAKE AND WATERSHEDRE
Page 4 and 5:
11.3 Prevent algal blooms from occu
Page 6 and 7:
LAYPERSON’S SYNOPSISLake Pocotopa
Page 8 and 9:
The stocking of walleye in Lake Poc
Page 10 and 11:
Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
Page 12 and 13: Period Covered 1988• Pollution fr
Page 14 and 15: Recommendations included• Algacid
Page 16 and 17: Major EventDecember 1999 - Fish kil
Page 18 and 19: Table 5. Land Use from the CT DEP G
Page 20 and 21: Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
Page 22 and 23: Figure 4. Lake Pocotopaug Bathymetr
Page 24 and 25: Table 6. QA/QC on Water Quality Dat
Page 26 and 27: Soils - USDA at MAGIC UCONN Geograp
Page 28 and 29: Table 8. Water Quality Variables Me
Page 30 and 31: Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
Page 32 and 33: Phytoplankton samples were collecte
Page 34 and 35: where many measurements would have
Page 36 and 37: Figure 7. 2001 Temperature and Diss
Page 38 and 39: Table 10 continued. 2001 Lake Pocot
Page 40 and 41: phytoplankton biomass (Wetzel 1983)
Page 42 and 43: Figure 9. Annual June, July and Aug
Page 44 and 45: elow 7:1 occurred on September 22,
Page 46 and 47: Table 12. 2001 Dry and Wet Weather
Page 48 and 49: Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
Page 56 and 57: were identified to genus and enumer
Page 58 and 59: Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
Page 68 and 69: Figure 10. 2001 Phytoplankton Bioma
Page 70 and 71: The late summer bloom of blue-green
Page 72 and 73: Table 15. 2001 Zooplankton DensityZ
Page 74 and 75: Table 16. 2001 Zooplankton BiomassZ
Page 76 and 77: 7.0 RELATIONSHIPS AND TRENDS7.1 Pre
Page 78 and 79: Figure 13. 1991-2001 Surface Water
Page 80 and 81: Figure 15. 2001 Surface and Mid-dep
Page 82 and 83: Figure 16. 1991-2001 Chlorophyll a
Page 84 and 85: Figure 18. 2001 Chlorophyll a vs. S
Page 86 and 87: Figure 20. 1991-2001 July and Augus
Page 88 and 89: Table 17. Empirical Model Calculati
Page 90 and 91: Table 18. Total Phosphorus Loading
Page 92 and 93: Table 19. Wet Weather Loading Summa
Page 94 and 95: With the best possible treatment of
Page 96 and 97: water quality should focus on input
Page 98 and 99: 10.0 MANAGEMENT NEEDS AND OBJECTIVE
Page 100 and 101: 11.2 Reducing Total Phosphorus and
Page 102 and 103: undeveloped forest land, an opportu
Page 104 and 105: Figure 22. Buffer Strips for Pollut
Page 106 and 107: Figure 23. Catch Basin with Sump an
Page 108 and 109: early spring to capture what appear
Page 110 and 111: Figure 26. Infiltration Systems.Lak
Page 112 and 113:
Figure 27. Constructed Treatment We
Page 114 and 115:
Chemical TreatmentIn-stream chemica
Page 116 and 117:
TABLE 21. MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR CO
Page 118 and 119:
TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
12.0 ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDSManagemen
Page 132 and 133:
13.0 RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Page 134 and 135:
this point, but as a rough guide, a
Page 136 and 137:
14.0 REFERENCESAd Hoc Lake Advisory
Page 138 and 139:
Scheuler T.R., P.A. Kumble, & M.A.
Page 140 and 141:
Appendix B:Supplemental Tables and
Page 142:
Appendix D:Educational MaterialsLak
show all

Lake Pocotopaug Lake and Watershed Restoration Evaluation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?