Lake Pocotopaug Lake and Watershed Restoration Evaluation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 12. 2001 Dry and Wet Weather Tributary and Storm Drain Data.SuspendedSolids (mg/L)Turbidiy(mg/L)pH (SU)Alkalinity(mg/L)Chloride(mg/L)Hardness(mg/L)SpecificConductance (us/cm)Station Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry WetLP-3 Mar 1 16 1.0 10.0 6.5 5.9 10.0 10.0 5 3 10 10May 2 117 1.2 6.5 8.0 12.0 17 20 118Jun 5 0.9 6.7 7.0 16 116Aug 3 9 3.0 5.8 7.2 6.7 18.0 16.0 15 117 104Sept 354 110.0 6.5 12.0 79LP-4 Mar 93 37.0 7.0 10.0 63 32May 260 42.0 31JunAug 77 42.0 6.5 11.0 101Sept 940 180.0 6.1 10.0 54LP-5 Mar 4 27 1.4 6.0 6.4 5.9 10.0 21.0 3 1 10 10May 5 81 0.6 6.7 4.0 6.0 5 7 54Jun 5 335 0.9 140.0 6.5 5.0 4.0 5 49Aug 2 2 1.1 1.2 7.2 7.0 8.0 10.0 13 73 73Sept 1 54 0.4 73.0 6.7 6.6 9.0 11.0 11 86 67LP-6 Mar 3 16 0.9 3.5 6.4 6.4 24.0 17.0 10 1 10 10May 7 264 2.4 6.5 8.0 10.0 8 9 45Jun 9 66 1.8 75.0 6.5 4.0 16.0 9 89Aug 6 1.4 6.7 30.0 13 139Sept 36 13.0 6.8 24.0 108LP-7 Mar 8 11 4.1 3.0 6.2 5.7 10.0 10.0 11 1 10 10May 7 268 5.8 6.5 6.0 6.0 5 10 50Jun 3 1.7 6.1 6.0 8 65AugSept 25 16.0 6.3 4.0 58Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluation 40May 2002
Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and Wet Weather Tributary and Storm Drain Data.SuspendedSolids (mg/L)Turbidiy(mg/L)pH (SU)Alkalinity(mg/L)Chloride(mg/L)Hardness(mg/L)SpecificConductance (us/cm)Station Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry WetLP-8 Mar 20 10 6.4 2.3 6.2 5.9 10.0 10.0 13 1 10 10May 12 114 2.2 6.5 6.0 10.0 12 15 43Jun 8 156 1.5 182.0 6.1 3.0 4.0 15 93AugSept 80 51.0 6.3 6.0 115LP-9 MarMay 7 310 0.5 6.4 32.0 8.0 105 24 519Jun 960 770.0 54.0Aug 15 4.9 6.6 42.0 513Sept 246 52.0 6.9 28.0 412LP-10 Mar 1 25 6.0 29.0 6.6 6.5 19.0 25.0 40 15 10 10May 15 1020 11.9 6.3 42.0 26.0 83 26 425Jun 16 498 17.0 690.0 6.3 42.0 22.0 61 347Aug 520 165.0 6.6 24.0 219Sept 83 47.0 6.2 8.0 153LP-11 Mar 3 8 1.9 3.2 6.1 5.8 11.0 18.0 7 1 10 10May 6 35 2.6 6.3 6.0 12.0 14 18 113Jun 4 116 2.7 133.0 6.1 4.0 4.0 11 71AugSept 576 210.0 6.7 28.0 165LP-12 Mar 6 20 3.0 8.0 6.6 6.3 16.0 34.0 180 92 99 57May 526 8.0 9Jun 8 1.5 7.0 7.0 72 357Aug 18 8.1 7.0 12.0 70Sept 652 20.0 6.1 9.0 28Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluation 41May 2002
Page 2 and 3: LAKE POCOTOPAUGLAKE AND WATERSHEDRE
Page 4 and 5: 11.3 Prevent algal blooms from occu
Page 6 and 7: LAYPERSON’S SYNOPSISLake Pocotopa
Page 8 and 9: The stocking of walleye in Lake Poc
Page 10 and 11: Lake Pocotopaug Restoration Evaluat
Page 12 and 13: Period Covered 1988• Pollution fr
Page 14 and 15: Recommendations included• Algacid
Page 16 and 17: Major EventDecember 1999 - Fish kil
Page 18 and 19: Table 5. Land Use from the CT DEP G
Page 22 and 23: Figure 4. Lake Pocotopaug Bathymetr
Page 24 and 25: Table 6. QA/QC on Water Quality Dat
Page 26 and 27: Soils - USDA at MAGIC UCONN Geograp
Page 28 and 29: Table 8. Water Quality Variables Me
Page 32 and 33: Phytoplankton samples were collecte
Page 34 and 35: where many measurements would have
Page 36 and 37: Figure 7. 2001 Temperature and Diss
Page 38 and 39: Table 10 continued. 2001 Lake Pocot
Page 40 and 41: phytoplankton biomass (Wetzel 1983)
Page 42 and 43: Figure 9. Annual June, July and Aug
Page 44 and 45: elow 7:1 occurred on September 22,
Page 48 and 49: Table 12 continued. 2001 Dry and We
Page 56 and 57: were identified to genus and enumer
Page 58 and 59: Table 13 continued. 2001 Phytoplank
Page 68 and 69: Figure 10. 2001 Phytoplankton Bioma
Page 70 and 71: The late summer bloom of blue-green
Page 72 and 73: Table 15. 2001 Zooplankton DensityZ
Page 74 and 75: Table 16. 2001 Zooplankton BiomassZ
Page 76 and 77: 7.0 RELATIONSHIPS AND TRENDS7.1 Pre
Page 78 and 79: Figure 13. 1991-2001 Surface Water
Page 80 and 81: Figure 15. 2001 Surface and Mid-dep
Page 82 and 83: Figure 16. 1991-2001 Chlorophyll a
Page 84 and 85: Figure 18. 2001 Chlorophyll a vs. S
Page 86 and 87: Figure 20. 1991-2001 July and Augus
Page 88 and 89: Table 17. Empirical Model Calculati
Page 90 and 91: Table 18. Total Phosphorus Loading
Page 92 and 93: Table 19. Wet Weather Loading Summa
Page 94 and 95: With the best possible treatment of
Page 96 and 97:
water quality should focus on input
Page 98 and 99:
10.0 MANAGEMENT NEEDS AND OBJECTIVE
Page 100 and 101:
11.2 Reducing Total Phosphorus and
Page 102 and 103:
undeveloped forest land, an opportu
Page 104 and 105:
Figure 22. Buffer Strips for Pollut
Page 106 and 107:
Figure 23. Catch Basin with Sump an
Page 108 and 109:
early spring to capture what appear
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 26. Infiltration Systems.Lak
Page 112 and 113:
Figure 27. Constructed Treatment We
Page 114 and 115:
Chemical TreatmentIn-stream chemica
Page 116 and 117:
TABLE 21. MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR CO
Page 118 and 119:
TABLE 21 continued. MANAGEMENT OPTI
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
12.0 ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDSManagemen
Page 132 and 133:
13.0 RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Page 134 and 135:
this point, but as a rough guide, a
Page 136 and 137:
14.0 REFERENCESAd Hoc Lake Advisory
Page 138 and 139:
Scheuler T.R., P.A. Kumble, & M.A.
Page 140 and 141:
Appendix B:Supplemental Tables and
Page 142:
Appendix D:Educational MaterialsLak
show all

Lake Pocotopaug Lake and Watershed Restoration Evaluation ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?