21.3 The Importance of <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong>1.3.1 The UK Government signed the European <strong>Landscape</strong> Convention 1 on the24 February 2006. The Convention aims to encourage public authorities within memberstates to adopt policies and measures for the protection, management and planning of alllandscapes, both outstanding and ordinary, that determine the quality of people’s livingenvironment. The Convention specially encourages local authorities to introduce exemplaryand long lasting polices or measures to protect, manage and plan landscapes.1.3.2 The European <strong>Landscape</strong> Convention defines landscape as:‘an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interactionof natural and/or human factors.’1.3.3 The term landscape is typically synonymous with the countryside; however, landscape iseverywhere and may comprise rural landscapes, urban landscapes or townscapes, urbanfringe landscapes, coastal landscapes or seascapes, etc.1.3.4 The European <strong>Landscape</strong> Convention defines ‘landscape character’ as:‘a distinct and recognisable pattern of elements that occur consistently in a particular type oflandscape.’1.3.5 In England and Scotland, <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 2 is a tool that allows landscapecharacter to be understood, explained and described in a transparent and robust way. It doesthis by mapping and describing the variations in physical, natural and cultural attributes andexperiential characteristics that make one area distinctive from another at a range of spatialscales. <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> also recognises how landscapes have changed overtime, and acknowledges the changing influences of human activities and the impacts ofeconomic development.1.3.6 The overall aim of landscape planning, design and management should be to achievesustainable landscapes that are as visually, biodiverse and culturally rich as possible to meetall of society’s social, economic and environmental needs. A better understanding oflandscapes provided by <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>s – their diversity, character anddistinctiveness, evolution, sensitivity to change and their management needs – is essential tohelp to work towards this goal.1.4 Planning Policy Framework1.4.1 National Planning Policy relating to landscape character is contained in PPS1 3 and PPS7 4 .Planning Policy Statement 1 : Delivering Sustainable Development1.4.2 PPS1 sets out the Government’s overarching planning policies on the delivery of sustainabledevelopment through the planning system. It states that one of the Government’s objectivesfor the planning system is that planning should facilitate and promote sustainable urban andrural development by protecting and enhancing the natural and historic environment and thequality and character of the countryside (para 5). In its key principles, PPS1 states that ‘a1 The European <strong>Landscape</strong> Convention opened for signature in Florence on 20 October 2000. Jim Knight, Minister for RuralAffairs, <strong>Landscape</strong> and Biodiversity announced the UK signing of the European <strong>Landscape</strong> Convention on 24 February 2006.2 <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: Guidance for England and Scotland (Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage,2002).3 Planning Policy Statement 1 : Delivering Sustainable Development (ODPM, 2005).4 Planning Policy Statement 7 : Sustainable Development in Rural Areas (ODPM, 2004).Section 1.0 – Introduction11100101R Final LCAs_09-06
3spatial planning approach should be at the heart of planning for sustainable development’(para 13.iii) and ‘design which fails to take the opportunities for improving the character andquality of an area should not be accepted’ (para 13.iv). When preparing development plans‘planning authorities should seek to enhance as well as protect biodiversity, natural habitats,the historic environment and landscape and townscape character’ (para 27). PPS1 alsorequires new design to be integrated into the existing urban form and natural and builtenvironments (para 35).Planning Policy Statement 7 : Sustainable Development in Rural Areas1.4.3 <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>, along with Village or Town Design Statements and Villageor Parish Plans, is recommended by PPS7 as a tool to assist Local Authorities in thepreparation of policies and guidance that encourages good quality design throughout ruralareas (para 13). <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> is also recommended by PPS7 as a tool forcreating carefully drafted, criteria-based policies in Local Development Documents to protectvalued landscapes outside nationally designated areas without the need for rigid localdesignations, which may restrict sustainable development and the economic vitality of ruralareas. PPS7 advises that local landscape designations should only be maintained or,exceptionally, extended where it can be clearly shown that criteria-based policies cannotprovide the necessary protection (paras 24 and 25).The East of England Regional Spatial Strategy1.4.4 The East of England Plan : Draft Revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the Eastof England was published by the East of England Regional Assembly for consultation inDecember 2004. An Examination in Public (EIP) into the draft RSS was held betweenNovember 2005 and March 2006. The EIP Panel Report was published in June 2006, whichincluded recommended changes to the draft RSS.1.4.5 The Draft RSS is based on the principles of sustainable development and specificallyidentifies landscape character as a key consideration in the spatial development of the region.Taking into account the recommended changes of the EIP Panel, draft Policy ENV2<strong>Landscape</strong> Conservation states:‘Planning authorities and other agencies in their plans, policies and programmes anddecision-making will, in accordance with statutory requirements, afford the highest status ofprotection to the East of England’s nationally designated landscapes – the Norfolk andSuffolk Broads (having status equal to a National Park) and the Chilterns, Norfolk Coast,Dedham Vale and Suffolk Coast and Heaths Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)s.Within the Broads priority will be given to the statutory purposes of conserving andenhancing the natural beauty, promoting public enjoyment and protecting the interests ofnavigation. Within the AONBs priority over other considerations will be given toconservation of the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage.Throughout the East of England planning authorities and other agencies in their plans,policies, programmes and decision-making will aim to recognise, protect and enhance thediversity and local distinctiveness of the countryside character areas indicated on Map 9.1by:- developing area-wide strategies, based on landscape character assessments, settinglong-term goals for landscape change, targeting planning and land management toolsand resources to influence that change, and giving priority to those areas subject tomost growth and change;11100101R Final LCAs_09-06Section 1.0 - Introduction
- Page 1: BRAINTREE, BRENTWOOD, CHELMSFORD,MA
- Page 6 and 7: 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS8.1 General8.2 K
- Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYBackgroundIn Octob
- Page 10 and 11: Executive Summary iv 11100101R Fina
- Page 13: 11.0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Background and
- Page 17 and 18: 5Proposals Map - expresses geograph
- Page 19 and 20: 7 View types and composition Landma
- Page 21 and 22: 9 the highlighting of landscape iss
- Page 23: 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA
- Page 26 and 27: 122.2.8 On the hills above the Lond
- Page 28 and 29: 142.2.22 The Essex Estuaries cSAC i
- Page 30 and 31: 16and have been found to have been
- Page 32 and 33: 18 Medieval settlement, in the pari
- Page 34 and 35: 20Historic Environment Designations
- Page 36 and 37: 22and drainage of other coastal wet
- Page 38 and 39: 24character. Upgrading of the rail
- Page 40 and 41: 26alternative sources from outside
- Page 42 and 43: 282.5.7 Together with the Joint Cha
- Page 44 and 45: 302.5.13 The seventy Landscape Char
- Page 46 and 47: 32Section 2.0 - Overview of the Stu
- Page 49 and 50: 1395.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF CHELM
- Page 51 and 52: 141A6 UPPER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 53 and 54: 143 Fourteen CWSs with unimproved g
- Page 55 and 56: 145A7 LOWER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 57 and 58: 147Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 59 and 60: 149to designed character and sense
- Page 61 and 62: 1515.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes5
- Page 63 and 64: 153and Good Easter in the lower lyi
- Page 65 and 66:
155B16 FELSTED FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 67 and 68:
157B17 TERLING FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 69 and 70:
159B20 WRITTLE FARMLAND PLATEAUKey
- Page 71 and 72:
161Proposed Landscape Strategy Obje
- Page 73 and 74:
163Visual Characteristics. The A12
- Page 75 and 76:
1655.4 Drained Estuarine Marsh Land
- Page 77 and 78:
167well screened in the landscape.
- Page 79 and 80:
1695.5 Wooded Farmland Landscapes5.
- Page 81 and 82:
171enclosure and tranquillity and a
- Page 83 and 84:
173F6 WOODHAM WOODED FARMLAND (shar
- Page 85 and 86:
175enclosed meadows within river va
- Page 87 and 88:
177north, south and east. Therefore
- Page 89 and 90:
179F10 HEYBRIDGE WOODED FARMLAND (s
- Page 91 and 92:
181Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 93 and 94:
183and Ramsden Heath). Church tower
- Page 95 and 96:
185F12 EAST HANNINGFIELD WOODED FAR
- Page 97 and 98:
187 Potential major road improvemen
- Page 99 and 100:
189Historic Land UseEvidence of his
- Page 101:
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 104 and 105:
3428.2.3 Planners, developers, arch
- Page 106 and 107:
344Drafting Core Policies and Suppo
- Page 108 and 109:
346 Make the link between planning
- Page 110 and 111:
348 change in the degree of key fac
- Page 112 and 113:
350Section 8.0 - Recommendations111
- Page 115:
APPENDIX ASTAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
- Page 118 and 119:
with the County assessment, but sho
- Page 120 and 121:
Fit with adjacent classificationsCB
- Page 122 and 123:
Chelmsford - Key threats to valued
- Page 124 and 125:
Appendix A - Stakeholder Consultati
- Page 126 and 127:
CBA gave a brief overview of the st
- Page 128 and 129:
9. Summary and Recommendations/Appl
- Page 130 and 131:
development planning with conservat
- Page 133 and 134:
GLOSSARYCommunity StrategyAll local
- Page 135:
APPENDIX CSOURCES OF FURTHER INFORM
- Page 138 and 139:
English Heritage, 2003, Register of
- Page 141 and 142:
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS
- Page 143:
APPENDIX ECURRENT LOCAL PLANNING SI
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix E - Current Local Planning
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX FDRAFT CORE STRATEGY LANDS
- Page 151:
cbawww.cba.uk.netLondon OfficeSwan