142trees, a string of small wet woodlands and the sloping valley sides. The undulating valley sides whichare steep in places, have a more open character with low thick but fragmented hedgerows, scatteredhedgerow trees and only occasional woods separating the large arable fields that line the valley sidesmeeting at the river. The fields to the east of the River Chelmer tend to be larger and more regular inshape. Those to west of the river tend to be smaller pastoral fields or areas of rough pasture or wetmeadow in the small floodplain with larger arable fields dominating the valley sides. As the RiverChelmer approaches <strong>Chelmsford</strong> it becomes more sinuous and meanders further from the east valleyside. The majority of the settlements excluding Great Dunmow are situated high on the valley sideswith very limited modern development. Great Dunmow is located within the western side of the rivervalley with the urban edge crossing the river and forming a finger of new development on the east sideof the valley to the south of the main town. The new development dominates views across the valleysouth of the town. The river valley is lined by roads running parallel to the valley along the top of thevalley sides. There are also a few small narrow lanes that cross the river before joining the road on theopposite valley side. Variety and interest is provided by the presence of a number of local vernacularbuildings with timber-frames, bright colour washed walls and thatched roofs. Examples of such housesinclude a group of 17 th century timber-framed houses clustered around the Manor in Little Easton. Themotte and ditch of Great Easton castle with the ground so Easton Hall also provides a visible landmark.Barnson Hall and Lodge, Liberty Hall, Chatham Hall and associated deer park also contribute to thecharacter and overall strong sense of place. There is an overall sense of tranquillity within the rivervalley, with a comprehensive network of public rights of way and narrow lanes winding through thelandscape. The river valley permeates <strong>Chelmsford</strong> introducing an important green corridor of ‘natural’character into the urban fabric of the town.Visual <strong>Character</strong>istics The church tower at Great Easton (St. John and St. Giles), Little Easton (St Mary the Virgin), LittleDunmow (St. Mary the Virgin) and Barnston (St. Andrews) and the spire of the church in Thaxtedform landmarks within views into and across the valley slopes. Generally open views from the valley sides into the gently meandering valley floodplain, which areframed in places by small patches of woodland. Enclosed and framed views along the valley corridor.Historic Land UseEvidence of historic land use within the <strong>Character</strong> Area is dominated by extensive enclosed meadowpastures along the river valley floodplains and pre-18 th century generally irregular fields, probably ofmedieval origin and some maybe even older. Whilst much 20 th century development has occurred,particularly in and around Little Waltham, the original medieval pattern of dispersed settlements andscattered farmsteads largely survives, with isolated farms, moated sites, and small hamlets strung outalong linear greens. The main historic landscape features include: Several areas of Ancient woodlands, particularly in the Ter valley. A limited number of small historic parklands. Occasional common fields, which has been later enclosed piecemeal by agreement. A number of parks or former parks including Little Easton, which subsequently became a WorldWar II airfield. The line of the Roman road from <strong>Chelmsford</strong> to Braintree, which effectively bisects the area.Ecological FeaturesThis <strong>Character</strong> Area is dominated by widespread arable agriculture within the valley of the RiverChelmer. The area contains 23 sites of nature conservation value. These include: Nine CWSs with ancient and semi-natural woodland habitats including: Eseley Wood, HomeWood, Bush Wood, Hoglands Wood/Frederick's Spring, Markshill Wood, Clobbs Wood. Three CWSs of woodland habitats to the south.Section 5.0 – <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> of <strong>Chelmsford</strong> <strong>Borough</strong>11100101R Final LCAs_09-06
143 Fourteen CWSs with unimproved grassland, scrub and wetland habitat including Flitch Way andFelsted Fen. Twelve CWSs with species-rich hedgerows and copses; and along the River Chelmer and itstributaries including Stebbing Brook.Key Planning and Land Management Issues Potential for pollution of the River Chelmer and its tributaries from fertilizer and pesticide run-offfrom agricultural valley slopes and floor. Potential for erection of new farm buildings on the valley slopes, which would be conspicuous onthe skyline. Potential residential expansion of villages onto valley slopes, which would be conspicuous on theskyline. Increasing traffic on minor roads, especially during busy tourist periods. Potential further decline in condition of field boundaries through further agriculture intensification.Sensitivities to ChangeSensitive key characteristics and landscape elements within this character area include dense riversidetrees and a string of small wet woodland on the sloping valley sides, which are sensitive to changes inland management. The skyline of the valley slopes is visually sensitive, with open and framed crossvalleyviews and long views along the river corridor potentially affected by new tall or non-screenednew development. Views to the valley sides from adjacent <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Areas are alsosensitive. Historic integrity is strong, with a largely surviving pattern of medieval dispersedsettlements, isolated farms, moated sites and small hamlets strung out along linear greens, smallhistoric parklands and a number of churches and local vernacular buildings with timber-frames, brightcolour-washed walls and thatched roofs. Several important wildlife habitats are scattered throughoutthe area (including 23 sites of importance for nature conservation, comprising ancient woodland,unimproved grassland, species-rich hedgerows and copses). Overall this character area has relativelyhigh sensitivity to change.Proposed <strong>Landscape</strong> Strategy ObjectivesConserve - seek to protect and enhance positive features that are essential in contributing to localdistinctiveness and sense of place through effective planning and positive land management measures.Enhance - seek to improve the integrity of the landscape, and reinforce its character, by introducingnew and/or enhanced elements where distinctive features or characteristics are absent.Suggested <strong>Landscape</strong> Planning Guidelines Consider the visual impact of new residential development and farm buildings upon valley sides. Conserve and enhance cross-valley views and characteristic views across and along the valley. Ensure any new development on valley sides is small-scale, responding to historic settlementpattern, landscape setting and locally distinctive building styles. Protect and enhance the role of the river valley in providing a network of informal open space andnature conservation sites.Suggested Land Management Guidelines Conserve and enhance the existing hedgerow pattern, and strengthen through planting whereappropriate to local landscape character. Conserve and manage areas of ancient and semi-natural woodland as important historical, landscapeand nature conservation features. Conserve and manage the ecological structure of woodland, copses and hedges within the characterarea. Strengthen the recreational role of the woodland resource.11100101R Final LCAs_09-06Section 5.0 – <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> of <strong>Chelmsford</strong> <strong>Borough</strong>
- Page 1: BRAINTREE, BRENTWOOD, CHELMSFORD,MA
- Page 6 and 7: 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS8.1 General8.2 K
- Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYBackgroundIn Octob
- Page 10 and 11: Executive Summary iv 11100101R Fina
- Page 13 and 14: 11.0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Background and
- Page 15 and 16: 3spatial planning approach should b
- Page 17 and 18: 5Proposals Map - expresses geograph
- Page 19 and 20: 7 View types and composition Landma
- Page 21 and 22: 9 the highlighting of landscape iss
- Page 23: 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA
- Page 26 and 27: 122.2.8 On the hills above the Lond
- Page 28 and 29: 142.2.22 The Essex Estuaries cSAC i
- Page 30 and 31: 16and have been found to have been
- Page 32 and 33: 18 Medieval settlement, in the pari
- Page 34 and 35: 20Historic Environment Designations
- Page 36 and 37: 22and drainage of other coastal wet
- Page 38 and 39: 24character. Upgrading of the rail
- Page 40 and 41: 26alternative sources from outside
- Page 42 and 43: 282.5.7 Together with the Joint Cha
- Page 44 and 45: 302.5.13 The seventy Landscape Char
- Page 46 and 47: 32Section 2.0 - Overview of the Stu
- Page 49 and 50: 1395.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF CHELM
- Page 51: 141A6 UPPER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 55 and 56: 145A7 LOWER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 57 and 58: 147Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 59 and 60: 149to designed character and sense
- Page 61 and 62: 1515.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes5
- Page 63 and 64: 153and Good Easter in the lower lyi
- Page 65 and 66: 155B16 FELSTED FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 67 and 68: 157B17 TERLING FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 69 and 70: 159B20 WRITTLE FARMLAND PLATEAUKey
- Page 71 and 72: 161Proposed Landscape Strategy Obje
- Page 73 and 74: 163Visual Characteristics. The A12
- Page 75 and 76: 1655.4 Drained Estuarine Marsh Land
- Page 77 and 78: 167well screened in the landscape.
- Page 79 and 80: 1695.5 Wooded Farmland Landscapes5.
- Page 81 and 82: 171enclosure and tranquillity and a
- Page 83 and 84: 173F6 WOODHAM WOODED FARMLAND (shar
- Page 85 and 86: 175enclosed meadows within river va
- Page 87 and 88: 177north, south and east. Therefore
- Page 89 and 90: 179F10 HEYBRIDGE WOODED FARMLAND (s
- Page 91 and 92: 181Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 93 and 94: 183and Ramsden Heath). Church tower
- Page 95 and 96: 185F12 EAST HANNINGFIELD WOODED FAR
- Page 97 and 98: 187 Potential major road improvemen
- Page 99 and 100: 189Historic Land UseEvidence of his
- Page 101: 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 104 and 105:
3428.2.3 Planners, developers, arch
- Page 106 and 107:
344Drafting Core Policies and Suppo
- Page 108 and 109:
346 Make the link between planning
- Page 110 and 111:
348 change in the degree of key fac
- Page 112 and 113:
350Section 8.0 - Recommendations111
- Page 115:
APPENDIX ASTAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
- Page 118 and 119:
with the County assessment, but sho
- Page 120 and 121:
Fit with adjacent classificationsCB
- Page 122 and 123:
Chelmsford - Key threats to valued
- Page 124 and 125:
Appendix A - Stakeholder Consultati
- Page 126 and 127:
CBA gave a brief overview of the st
- Page 128 and 129:
9. Summary and Recommendations/Appl
- Page 130 and 131:
development planning with conservat
- Page 133 and 134:
GLOSSARYCommunity StrategyAll local
- Page 135:
APPENDIX CSOURCES OF FURTHER INFORM
- Page 138 and 139:
English Heritage, 2003, Register of
- Page 141 and 142:
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS
- Page 143:
APPENDIX ECURRENT LOCAL PLANNING SI
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix E - Current Local Planning
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX FDRAFT CORE STRATEGY LANDS
- Page 151:
cbawww.cba.uk.netLondon OfficeSwan