13.07.2015 Views

Landscape Character Assessment - Chelmsford Borough Council

Landscape Character Assessment - Chelmsford Borough Council

Landscape Character Assessment - Chelmsford Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7 View types and composition Landmarks1.5.7 The survey information (including photographs) was used to (i) inform the descriptions oflandscape character and (ii) to test and refine the draft <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Area boundaries.<strong>Character</strong>isation1.5.8 The characterisation stage involved the combination of the desk study research and fieldsurvey analysis to identify and map generic <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Types and geographicallyunique <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Areas at 1:25,000 scale (see Section 2.5 for details).1.5.9 For each generic <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Type, its boundaries were mapped and its keycharacteristics described. For each unique <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Area, its boundaries weremapped and the following characterisation information was recorded: Key <strong>Character</strong>istics Overall <strong>Character</strong> Description Visual <strong>Character</strong>istics Historic Land Use Ecological FeaturesEvaluation1.5.10 This stage involved making the following judgements about each <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Area: Key Planning and Land Management Issues Sensitivities to Change Proposed landscape Strategy Objectives Suggested <strong>Landscape</strong> Planning Guidelines Suggested Land Management GuidelinesEvaluation of <strong>Landscape</strong> Sensitivity1.5.11 The methodology for evaluating the intrinsic sensitivities of each <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Areato change is based on the criteria for judging sensitivity set out in an accompanying paper tothe <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> – Guidance for England and Scotland 6 , taking intoaccount current best practice.1.5.12 It should be noted that the evaluation is based on the relatively broad-brush analysisundertaken at 1:25,000 scale for this Study. The degree of sensitivity is not absolute. It islikely to vary according to the nature of change under consideration, and is therefore onlyindicative. This evaluation should be read in conjunction with the more strategic evaluationof landscape sensitivity set out in the Essex <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 7 .1.5.13 The criteria used to evaluate the relative sensitivities of each <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> Area aredefined in Box 2.6 <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> – Guidance for England and Scotland : Topic Paper 8 – Techniques and Criteria forJudging Capacity and Sensitivity (Swanwick, 2004).7 Essex County <strong>Council</strong> and Southend-on-Sea <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (July 2002).11100101R Final LCAs_09-06Section 1.0 - Introduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!