174footpaths crisscross the area, including St Peter’s Way. Other land use is visible that extends from theproximity to Danbury and Maldon: sand and gravel pits, nurseries, agricultural storage and othercommercial activity. This is a varied and interesting landscape, where the enclosed, intimate characterin the wooded hills contrasts with the semi-enclosed, more open views surrounding it on the lowerground. Heavy traffic detracts from the overall tranquillity of the area, but in the wooded hills and inthe lanes south of Danbury there are still areas with a strong sense of tranquillity and a strong sense ofplace.Visual <strong>Character</strong>istics Long views of the Chelmer Valley framed by woodland open up on the edges of the ridge in thenorth, whereas more open views across arable fields are possible on the lower ground aroundBicknacre and Cock Clarke’s. Intimate character in the wooded areas. Occasional views to churches that sit on higher ground. Dramatic small rounded hills at Hazeleigh.Historic Land UseEvidence of historic land use within the <strong>Character</strong> Area is dominated by pre-18th century fields,probably of medieval origin and some maybe even older, mostly regular in plan. Historically, thesettlement pattern was dispersed, some of it being focussed on commons. This pattern has survivedwith a more recent nucleation at Bicknacre. The main historic landscape features include: Co-axial field layouts, usually relating directly to the immediate topography. River valleys marked by enclosed meadow. Areas of ancient woodland, primarily along the eastern side of the area. A number of parks of medieval origin.Ecological FeaturesThis <strong>Character</strong> Area is dominated by widespread arable agriculture with large blocks of woodland.The area contains 9 sites of nature conservation and a further four areas of ancient woodland areas,including: Thrift Wood, Woodham Ferrers SSSI, comprised of ancient and semi-natural woodland. Eight CWSs comprised of ancient and semi-natural woodland and grassland habitats, includingHyde Wood, Thrift Wood, Folks Wood, Parsonage Wood, Hazeleigh High Wood, Slough HouseWood, Jackletts Wood, New England Wood, Round Wood, Squeaking-Gate Wood, Cank Wood,and Great Wood. Other ecological features, including small streams, ditches, irrigation reservoirs, Hedgerows and afew unimproved meadows.Key Planning and Land Management Issues Pressure of increased traffic on rural and minor lanes. Potential visually intrusive development along A414. Potential for visually intrusive expansion to the settlement edges of Maldon. Potential for visually intrusive development of new farm buildings.Sensitivities to ChangeSensitive key characteristics and landscape elements within this character area include the wooded,east-west ridge, tree-lined road, lanes and tracks, tree-enclosed fields and many dispersed fragments ofancient oak-hornbeam woodland, all of which are sensitive to changes in land management. Thenetwork of quiet rural lanes (including lining hedgebanks and hedgerows) is also sensitive to change orincreased traffic associated with new development. There is a relatively strong sense of historicintegrity, resulting from a dispersed settlement pattern (with more recent nucleation at Bicknacre),Section 5.0 – <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> of <strong>Chelmsford</strong> <strong>Borough</strong>11100101R Final LCAs_09-06
175enclosed meadows within river valleys and a considerable degree of co-axiality within fields (on alocal-scale, usually relating directly to the immediate topography. Overall, this character area hasrelatively high sensitivity to change.Proposed <strong>Landscape</strong> Strategy ObjectivesConserve - seek to protect and enhance positive features that are essential in contributing to localdistinctiveness and sense of place through effective planning and positive land management measures.Enhance - seek to improve the integrity of the landscape, and reinforce its character, by introducingnew and/or enhanced elements where distinctive features or characteristics are absent.Suggested <strong>Landscape</strong> Planning Guidelines Conserve the mostly rural character of the area. Ensure that any new development responds to historic settlement pattern and uses materials whichare appropriate to the local landscape character; such development should be well integrated intothe surrounding landscape. Ensure that new farm buildings are sensitively designed and located within the landscape to accordwith existing characterSuggested Land Management Guidelines Conserve and restore existing hedgerow network where gappy and depleted especially on propertyboundaries or on field margins. Conserve, manage and enhance areas of semi natural and ancient woodland as important heritage,nature conservation and landscape features. Conserve historic lanes and unimproved roadside verges. Introduce arable field margins as a means to ensure that mature trees within hedgerows are notdisturbed by ploughing. Introduce a planting management programme to ensure future trees within field hedgerowboundaries will succeed mature trees. Safeguard Woodham Walter Common SSSI.11100101R Final LCAs_09-06Section 5.0 – <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Character</strong> of <strong>Chelmsford</strong> <strong>Borough</strong>
- Page 1:
BRAINTREE, BRENTWOOD, CHELMSFORD,MA
- Page 6 and 7:
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS8.1 General8.2 K
- Page 8 and 9:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYBackgroundIn Octob
- Page 10 and 11:
Executive Summary iv 11100101R Fina
- Page 13 and 14:
11.0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Background and
- Page 15 and 16:
3spatial planning approach should b
- Page 17 and 18:
5Proposals Map - expresses geograph
- Page 19 and 20:
7 View types and composition Landma
- Page 21 and 22:
9 the highlighting of landscape iss
- Page 23:
2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA
- Page 26 and 27:
122.2.8 On the hills above the Lond
- Page 28 and 29:
142.2.22 The Essex Estuaries cSAC i
- Page 30 and 31:
16and have been found to have been
- Page 32 and 33:
18 Medieval settlement, in the pari
- Page 34 and 35: 20Historic Environment Designations
- Page 36 and 37: 22and drainage of other coastal wet
- Page 38 and 39: 24character. Upgrading of the rail
- Page 40 and 41: 26alternative sources from outside
- Page 42 and 43: 282.5.7 Together with the Joint Cha
- Page 44 and 45: 302.5.13 The seventy Landscape Char
- Page 46 and 47: 32Section 2.0 - Overview of the Stu
- Page 49 and 50: 1395.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF CHELM
- Page 51 and 52: 141A6 UPPER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 53 and 54: 143 Fourteen CWSs with unimproved g
- Page 55 and 56: 145A7 LOWER CHELMER RIVER VALLEY (s
- Page 57 and 58: 147Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 59 and 60: 149to designed character and sense
- Page 61 and 62: 1515.3 Farmland Plateau Landscapes5
- Page 63 and 64: 153and Good Easter in the lower lyi
- Page 65 and 66: 155B16 FELSTED FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 67 and 68: 157B17 TERLING FARMLAND PLATEAU (sh
- Page 69 and 70: 159B20 WRITTLE FARMLAND PLATEAUKey
- Page 71 and 72: 161Proposed Landscape Strategy Obje
- Page 73 and 74: 163Visual Characteristics. The A12
- Page 75 and 76: 1655.4 Drained Estuarine Marsh Land
- Page 77 and 78: 167well screened in the landscape.
- Page 79 and 80: 1695.5 Wooded Farmland Landscapes5.
- Page 81 and 82: 171enclosure and tranquillity and a
- Page 83: 173F6 WOODHAM WOODED FARMLAND (shar
- Page 87 and 88: 177north, south and east. Therefore
- Page 89 and 90: 179F10 HEYBRIDGE WOODED FARMLAND (s
- Page 91 and 92: 181Suggested Landscape Planning Gui
- Page 93 and 94: 183and Ramsden Heath). Church tower
- Page 95 and 96: 185F12 EAST HANNINGFIELD WOODED FAR
- Page 97 and 98: 187 Potential major road improvemen
- Page 99 and 100: 189Historic Land UseEvidence of his
- Page 101: 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 104 and 105: 3428.2.3 Planners, developers, arch
- Page 106 and 107: 344Drafting Core Policies and Suppo
- Page 108 and 109: 346 Make the link between planning
- Page 110 and 111: 348 change in the degree of key fac
- Page 112 and 113: 350Section 8.0 - Recommendations111
- Page 115: APPENDIX ASTAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
- Page 118 and 119: with the County assessment, but sho
- Page 120 and 121: Fit with adjacent classificationsCB
- Page 122 and 123: Chelmsford - Key threats to valued
- Page 124 and 125: Appendix A - Stakeholder Consultati
- Page 126 and 127: CBA gave a brief overview of the st
- Page 128 and 129: 9. Summary and Recommendations/Appl
- Page 130 and 131: development planning with conservat
- Page 133 and 134: GLOSSARYCommunity StrategyAll local
- Page 135:
APPENDIX CSOURCES OF FURTHER INFORM
- Page 138 and 139:
English Heritage, 2003, Register of
- Page 141 and 142:
HISTORIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS
- Page 143:
APPENDIX ECURRENT LOCAL PLANNING SI
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix E - Current Local Planning
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX FDRAFT CORE STRATEGY LANDS
- Page 151:
cbawww.cba.uk.netLondon OfficeSwan