- Page 1 and 2:
Assessing graduate screen productio
- Page 3 and 4:
Project Team and Contact DetailsPro
- Page 5 and 6:
Rasch Statistical Analysis and Cons
- Page 7 and 8:
StaffNathan Mewitt, for conference
- Page 9 and 10: ContentsList of Acronyms ..........
- Page 11 and 12: List of AcronymsACTAFTRSACUADSAGMAL
- Page 13 and 14: List of TablesTable 5.1 The number
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 6.6Figure 7.1Figure 7.2Figur
- Page 17 and 18: Executive SummaryThe Assessing of S
- Page 19 and 20: PART 11. ASSESSING GRADUATE SCREEN
- Page 21 and 22: • to host a conference that will
- Page 23 and 24: ulky, unwieldy and untenable for th
- Page 25 and 26: Art scholarship: This term is used
- Page 27 and 28: describes the reasons for the art-b
- Page 29 and 30: and problematic. Problems of assess
- Page 31 and 32: assessment. Rather, the feedback pr
- Page 33 and 34: • If it is shown at a properly ac
- Page 35 and 36: from the UK as depicted in Figure 2
- Page 37 and 38: in Higher Education. Sydney, ALTC/U
- Page 39 and 40: accepted notions of scholarship.3.1
- Page 41 and 42: In contrast to the linear unfolding
- Page 43 and 44: Film editors understand the multidi
- Page 45 and 46: 3.2.9 Thinking VisuallyWhen it come
- Page 47 and 48: 6. The existence of this art-theory
- Page 49 and 50: Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1971 and in
- Page 51 and 52: How do different academics assess s
- Page 53 and 54: The above standard deviation scores
- Page 55 and 56: Is there something more insightful
- Page 57 and 58: Total (%) Mark and the component ma
- Page 59: Figure 4.10 Schematic representatio
- Page 63 and 64: 4.4.8 Exhibition SiteThe exhibition
- Page 65 and 66: 4.5.2 Role of Conventional Scholars
- Page 67 and 68: 4.5.8 Scholarship StandardsThe thre
- Page 69 and 70: The artistic “How” is often pre
- Page 71 and 72: TOTAL % SCOREA-Z CONSTITUENT PARTSF
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 4.20 Logical oppositions and
- Page 75 and 76: ETHICSQ20THE USE OF EMOTIONS IN THI
- Page 77 and 78: The above criteria components const
- Page 79 and 80: 2009 and can be found at the follow
- Page 81 and 82: with us on this project. Subsequent
- Page 83 and 84: discerned in Table 5.1 below. It sh
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 5.1 Project Assessment Schem
- Page 87 and 88: Queensland Griffith 5-6 November 20
- Page 89 and 90: VICTORIAN ASSESSMENT GROUP complete
- Page 91 and 92: assessment scale of 0 to 100 per ce
- Page 93 and 94: 6.3 Linear ScaleIt turns out that,
- Page 95 and 96: 6.5 The Rasch Model Probability Cur
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 6.5 Category characteristic
- Page 99 and 100: 7. RASCH ANALYSIS 17.1 Rasch Analys
- Page 101 and 102: 7.1.5 Location of the Threshold Est
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 7.5 TC for Q24 (Exhibition s
- Page 105 and 106: 7.1.6 Fit of Items to the ModelCons
- Page 107 and 108: intense or difficult items to exten
- Page 109 and 110: As may be seen, item Q23 (amount of
- Page 111 and 112:
Q2 SCRIPTFigure 7.17 ICC of Q2 (Scr
- Page 113 and 114:
Q2 SOUNDSCAPEFigure 7.21 ICC of Q2
- Page 115 and 116:
Q2 ART DESIGNFigure 7.25 ICC of Q2
- Page 117 and 118:
This means that highest score group
- Page 119 and 120:
Q8 ENHANCEMENTFigure 7.33 ICC of Q8
- Page 121 and 122:
Q13 DURATIONFigure 7.37 ICC of Q13
- Page 123 and 124:
Q17 SOCIAL RELEVANCEFigure 7.41 ICC
- Page 125 and 126:
Q22 AIMSFigure 7.45 ICC of Q22 (Thi
- Page 127 and 128:
8. RASCH COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 28.1
- Page 129 and 130:
FactorSub-groupNumberNMeanproductio
- Page 131 and 132:
Production Mean location Std deviat
- Page 133 and 134:
Mean differences amongst Years, Dur
- Page 135 and 136:
0.488: it is negative, as expected.
- Page 137 and 138:
percentage statistic valueCountry A
- Page 139 and 140:
highest.Factor Sub-group N Mean loc
- Page 141 and 142:
(dots) are somewhat flat compared t
- Page 143 and 144:
The slight under-discrimination evi
- Page 145 and 146:
9.2.5 Local AssessorsThe need to un
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 9.6 Graph of mean locations
- Page 149 and 150:
9.4.5 State Assessment Committee Mo
- Page 151 and 152:
9.4.8 Assessing Crew FunctionsHow d
- Page 153 and 154:
6. Auto-ethnographic information is
- Page 155 and 156:
PART 410. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATI
- Page 157 and 158:
Q4THE PUBLICATION VALUE OF THIS PRO
- Page 159 and 160:
Q12THE DURATION OF THIS PRODUCTION
- Page 161 and 162:
Q20THIS PRODUCTION HAS ATTAINED ITS
- Page 163 and 164:
10.1.9 Conclusion 5: To Be Consiste
- Page 165 and 166:
- individual contribution to the pr
- Page 167 and 168:
The result of this project support
- Page 169 and 170:
scholars, who will be able to follo
- Page 171 and 172:
Diegetic Life Forms II Conference b
- Page 173 and 174:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAndrich, David, ‘A ra
- Page 175 and 176:
Kress, G. and Theo van Leeuwen, Rea
- Page 177 and 178:
Rasch, G., On general laws and the
- Page 179 and 180:
INFORMATION SHEETAssessing graduate
- Page 181 and 182:
Consent FormAssessing graduate scre
- Page 183 and 184:
1. OVERALL MARK (%)PRODUCTIONS 1-5
- Page 185 and 186:
6. THE CLARITY OF THE THEME/ CENTRA
- Page 187 and 188:
12. THE INTELLECTUAL LEVEL OF THIS
- Page 189 and 190:
18. OVERALL PRODUCTION VALUES ARE:
- Page 191:
24. YOUR RECOMMENDED EXHIBITION SIT