13.07.2015 Views

ZICw2w

ZICw2w

ZICw2w

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

344 • Macroeconomicslarger the impact on the market sector of the economy, and the less controlthe government has over composition. Tax increases decrease themultiplier by leaving workers with less income to spend on market goods.A smaller multiplier increases the ability of the government to affectmacro-allocation, and reduced income reduces scale. Taxes can also beused to discourage undesired behaviors, such as pollution, and subsidiescan be used to encourage desired ones, such as environmental preservation.The full impact of taxation on scale and macro-allocation dependson how the taxes are spent, but taxes can certainly play an extremely importantrole in achieving an optimal scale—a point we will examine atgreater length in Chapter 22.Another important point must be made here. Under traditional analysisof the IS-LM curve, fiscal policy when the economy is operating at fullcapacity results in crowding out (remember the full bowling alley) andshould be avoided. However, in terms of macro-allocation and scale, fulloutput conditions can increase the effectiveness of fiscal policy. With fullemployment, if the government spends money to restore wetlands, interestrates and labor costs go up, and it is more difficult for the bowling alleyto expand. (Fortunately, scenic wetlands offer a recreational alternative tobowling that does not displace ecosystem services.) Government expenditureon restoring ecosystems under such conditions will therefore havean unambiguous impact on reducing scale.What are the distributional impacts of fiscal and monetary policy? Fiscalpolicy in the form of taxation and government transfers can be easilyand effectively distributed as desired. Government transfers such as welfare,unemployment insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Securityall play an important role in distribution. Corporate welfare programs(which outweigh transfer payments to the poor 13 ) affect distribution inthe opposite direction. Public goods are equally available to all, and theirprovision improves distribution. In terms of income, progressive taxationcan help reduce gross inequalities in income distribution, a necessary conditionmorally and practically if we are to achieve a sustainable scale.Monetary policy can also play an important but narrower role in distribution.High interest rates caused by tight monetary policy can lead to unemployment,and they favor creditors over debtors, as discussed earlier inthe section on inflation and disinflation. Low interest rates have the oppositeeffect.In summary, in terms of ecological economic goals, monetary policy isa blunt instrument directed only toward the production and consumptionof market goods, with limited flexibility in terms of distribution and13 C. M. Sennott, The $150 Billion “Welfare” Recipients: U.S. Corporations, Boston Globe, July7, 1996.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!