2000). The basicranium provides a platform on which <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> can sit <strong>and</strong> from which<strong>the</strong> face can grow, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> one way or ano<strong>the</strong>r connects <strong>the</strong> cranium with <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong>body. For example, this feature articulates with <strong>the</strong> m<strong>and</strong>ible <strong>and</strong> vertebral column,provides a channel through which <strong>the</strong> neural <strong>and</strong> circulatory connections of <strong>the</strong> face,neck, <strong>and</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> can pass, forms <strong>the</strong> roof of <strong>the</strong> nasopharynx, while hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>connect<strong>in</strong>g all of <strong>the</strong> sense organs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> (Kuroe, Rosas, Molleson, 2004;Lieberman, Ross, Ravosa, 2000).In humans, <strong>the</strong> cranial base appears as a cartilag<strong>in</strong>ous platform called <strong>the</strong>chondrocranium at about 2 months of embryonic development. At seven weeks it isseparated by <strong>the</strong> mid-sphenoid synchondrosis <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> prechordal (anterior) <strong>and</strong>postchordal (posterior) portions, which grow relatively <strong>in</strong>dependently of each o<strong>the</strong>r,possibly as a result of <strong>the</strong>ir different embryonic orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong>/or different spatial <strong>and</strong>functional roles (Lieberman, Ross, Ravosa, 2000).The center of <strong>the</strong> basicranium near <strong>the</strong> sphenoid body reaches adult size <strong>and</strong>shape earlier than <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g regions, while <strong>the</strong> anterior, middle, <strong>and</strong> posteriorcranial fossae grow slightly longer <strong>and</strong> more or less <strong>in</strong>dependently of each o<strong>the</strong>r (Bastir& Rosas, 2005; Lieberman, Pearson, Mowbray, 2000; Lieberman, Ross, Ravosa, 2000),with each <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a complex series of growth events that ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>volvedisplacement <strong>and</strong> drift (Lieberman, Ross, Ravosa, 2000).Despite <strong>the</strong> relative <strong>in</strong>dependence among dimensions of <strong>the</strong> cranial base, its size,shape, <strong>and</strong> degree of flexion play an important role <strong>in</strong> neurocranial <strong>and</strong> facial growth(Enlow & Hans, 1996; Kohn et al. 1993; Lieberman, 1998; Lieberman, Ross, Ravosa,2000; Ross, 1995; Ross & Ravosa, 1993), <strong>and</strong> because <strong>the</strong> cranial base acts as a bridge7
etween <strong>the</strong> neurocranium <strong>and</strong> face, upon which <strong>the</strong> latter is constructed, <strong>variation</strong> <strong>in</strong> thisfeature also corresponds to <strong>variation</strong> <strong>in</strong> facial form among <strong>modern</strong> human groups (Enlow& Hans, 1996; Kuroe, Rosas, Molleson, 2004).For example, an open angled basicranium results <strong>in</strong> a face that protrudesanteriorly, is vertically elongated, <strong>and</strong> is associated with a dolichocephalic headform(Enlow & Hans, 1996). In contrast, a smaller basicranial angle denotes a shorteranteroposterior midface <strong>and</strong> a wider nasomaxillary complex, which are characteristic of<strong>the</strong> brachycephalic headform. The basicranium also plays a major role <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>shape <strong>and</strong> position of <strong>the</strong> <strong>eye</strong> <strong>orbit</strong>s, which become more frontated, convergent, <strong>and</strong>ventrally flexed as <strong>the</strong> cranial base angle decreases (Cartmill, 1970; Ross, 1995; Ross &Ravosa, 1993), <strong>in</strong> association with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> relative bra<strong>in</strong> size (Lieberman, Ross,Ravosa, 2000; Strait & Ross, 1999).Because <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> cranium are <strong>the</strong> first to grow, serv<strong>in</strong>g as a template onwhich <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> face develops (Enlow & Hans, 1996), cont<strong>in</strong>ual selection for a largerbra<strong>in</strong> throughout hom<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> evolution has shifted <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> shortened <strong>the</strong> duration ofgrowth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid <strong>and</strong> lower face. This has resulted <strong>in</strong> a worldwide <strong>and</strong> accelerat<strong>in</strong>gtrend toward orthognathism, which has co<strong>in</strong>cided with a shift toward cranial globularity<strong>in</strong> recent human evolution (Brown 1987; Brown & Maeda, 2004; Carlson, 1976; Carlson& Van Gerven, 1977; Hanihara, 1994, 2000; Henneberg & Steyn, 1993; Lahr & Wright,1996; Wu et al. 2007). As part of this research, samples of chimpanzee <strong>and</strong> past hom<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>fossil species with different grades of encephalization <strong>and</strong> facial prognathism are used to<strong>in</strong>vestigate how <strong>eye</strong> <strong>orbit</strong> morphology varies <strong>in</strong> association with <strong>the</strong>se trends of cranialexpansion <strong>and</strong> facial retraction dur<strong>in</strong>g human evolution.8
- Page 1: MODERN VARIATION AND EVOLUTIONARY C
- Page 7 and 8: VITAJanuary 2, 1978……………
- Page 9 and 10: TABLE OF CONTENTSPageAbstract .….
- Page 11 and 12: 7. Summary and Conclusion………
- Page 13 and 14: Table 3.13: Wilks' lambda and Chi-s
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 5.4: Change in orbital bread
- Page 17 and 18: Although there is a great deal of c
- Page 19 and 20: extent that in modern humans it sit
- Page 21: in the face and cranium” (Enlow &
- Page 25 and 26: Schultz (1940) observes a negative
- Page 27 and 28: sphenoid, and between 5 and 6 in th
- Page 29 and 30: its relative position during forwar
- Page 31 and 32: fact more variation exist between r
- Page 33 and 34: plane is highly related to factors
- Page 35 and 36: cranial and facial height occurs in
- Page 37 and 38: assessed in relation to patterns of
- Page 39 and 40: or throughout hominin evolution cou
- Page 41 and 42: in roughly the same proportions (An
- Page 43 and 44: association with juvenile-onset myo
- Page 45 and 46: Craniofacial Variables Label Landma
- Page 47 and 48: In this investigation the FH is not
- Page 49 and 50: this study most research questions
- Page 51 and 52: Craniofacial Variables Label ErrorC
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 3MODERN HUMAN VARIATION IN
- Page 55 and 56: Sample Sample Size RepositoryAfrica
- Page 57 and 58: change in orbital anatomy and will
- Page 59 and 60: 3.3.1 Interorbital breadth and bior
- Page 61 and 62: 3.3.2 Orbital height and orbital br
- Page 63 and 64: Basion-Superior Orbit, Basion-Infer
- Page 65 and 66: 98Vertical Angle of Orbital Margins
- Page 67 and 68: statistical tools. In the next sect
- Page 69 and 70: Correlation obbobhobdobvobfekbdkbbs
- Page 71 and 72: obbobhobdobvobfekbdkbbsobioFunction
- Page 73 and 74:
variables in the first discriminant
- Page 75 and 76:
distance matrix, which shows the Af
- Page 77 and 78:
golxcbzybbbhbplufbnphnlhobbobhobdob
- Page 79 and 80:
non-orbital cranial and facial trai
- Page 81 and 82:
Function 242012AncestryAfricanAsian
- Page 83 and 84:
eadth (ekb), and basion-orbitale (b
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 4EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN THE
- Page 87 and 88:
This sample represents the most mor
- Page 89 and 90:
analysis. This was done to remove a
- Page 91 and 92:
190Boxplot of Cranial Size vs Time1
- Page 93 and 94:
flexed in association with neurocra
- Page 95 and 96:
Variables N Coefficient t p R²1) B
- Page 97 and 98:
Ross (1995) also finds a relationsh
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 4.4: Image of Shandingdong (
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 5EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN THE
- Page 103 and 104:
ecause of a general reduction in cr
- Page 105 and 106:
adequate space within the orbits fo
- Page 107 and 108:
Western European temporal groups sa
- Page 109 and 110:
Upper Paleolithic (Figure 5.4). The
- Page 111 and 112:
Regardless of the relative contribu
- Page 113 and 114:
of facial projection vs. time indic
- Page 115 and 116:
Boxplot of Cranial Index vs Time908
- Page 117 and 118:
5.6 Results of regression analyses:
- Page 119 and 120:
Although the direction and magnitud
- Page 121 and 122:
Additionally, because the eyeball s
- Page 123 and 124:
corroborates the findings of other
- Page 125 and 126:
Sample Sample Sizes Method DataFema
- Page 127 and 128:
approximately 3.5 show little to no
- Page 129 and 130:
In females there is a clear differe
- Page 131 and 132:
Boxplot of Orbital Vol vs Sex25.022
- Page 133 and 134:
Ancestral Group N mean s.d. t pAfri
- Page 135 and 136:
5.5Boxplot of Relative Eye Size vs
- Page 137 and 138:
away from emmetropia in individuals
- Page 139 and 140:
ceases. Additionally, different pat
- Page 141 and 142:
of the orbit that the eyeball fills
- Page 143 and 144:
CHAPTER 7SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION7.1
- Page 145 and 146:
margins in this group. The slightly
- Page 147 and 148:
classification of dry skulls and as
- Page 149 and 150:
Six orbital variables were used to
- Page 151 and 152:
A final prediction relating to how
- Page 153 and 154:
Nevertheless, orbital traits that c
- Page 155 and 156:
etraction could not be evaluated. H
- Page 157 and 158:
A statistically significant negativ
- Page 159 and 160:
to engage in non-subsistence activi
- Page 161 and 162:
comes at a cost to visual acuity ho
- Page 163 and 164:
trajectories between the eye and or
- Page 165 and 166:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAiello, L., Dean, C. (1
- Page 167 and 168:
Bruner, E., Saracino, B., Passarell
- Page 169 and 170:
Goldschmidt, E., Lam, C., Opper, S.
- Page 171 and 172:
Lam, C., Edwards, M., Millodot, M.,
- Page 173 and 174:
Quant, J., Woo, G. (1992) Normal va
- Page 175:
Weiss, K. (2002) How the Eye Got it