Entrepreneurship Programs in Developing Countries: A ... - IYFLive.net

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3. Sample Characteristics by RegionAll sample AFR EAP ECA LAC MENA SARTotal number of estimates 1,116 185 119 180 318 96 218Type of intervention (% )Training only 22.3% 21.6% 6.7% 21.1% 37.7% - 19.7%Training+Counseling 11.2% - - - 20.8% 61.5% -Financing only 50.1% 58.4% 93.3% 78.9% 9.1% 38.5% 60.6%Financing+Counseling 8.9% - - - 29.9% - 1.8%Training+Financing 6.3% 16.8% - - - - 17.9%Outcome Groups (% )LM Activity 21.7% 10.3% 20.2% 36.7% 29.2% 31.3% 4.6%LM Income 27.7% 22.7% 35.3% 21.7% 31.8% 19.8% 30.3%Financial Behavior 11.5% 20.5% 29.4% 10.0% 2.8% 4.2% 11.0%Business Knowledge and Practice 13.9% 10.8% - 11.1% 16.4% 16.7% 21.6%Business Performance 16.5% 20.0% 10.1% 16.7% 16.7% 11.5% 18.8%Attitudes 9.0% 15.7% 6.7% 3.9% 3.1% 16.7% 13.8%Population Groups (% )Female 26.3% 27.0% 74.8% 6.7% 15.7% 11.5% 37.2%Youth 14.6% 11.4% - 27.8% 10.4% 61.5% -High Education 16.8% 8.6% 21.8% 20.0% 12.9% 61.5% 4.1%SA beneficiaries 14.3% 11.4% - - 43.7% - -Entrepreneurs 34.6% 50.3% 26.1% 26.7% 45.3% 8.3% 28.4%Microcredit clients 27.3% 24.3% 3.4% 21.1% 34.9% - 49.1%Urban 43.9% 76.8% 17.6% 21.1% 52.5% 61.5% 28.9%Providers (% )Government agencies 21.4% 11.9% - - 49.1% 61.5% 0.9%NGOs and community organizers 35.2% 15.7% 79.0% - 56.9% - 40.8%Universities/researchers 20.7% 38.9% 17.6% - 2.2% 61.5% 33.0%MFIs or banks 56.5% 49.7% 100.0% 100.0% 34.9% 38.5% 41.7%Notes: Type of interventions and outcomes include mutually exclusive categories while the type of beneficiaries andproviders of the programs are not defined in a mutually exclusive way. The categories of beneficiaries can overalp and theprograms are often delivered by multiple agencies.30
Table 4. Summary of Estimated Impacts by OutcomeOutcomes LM Activity LM IncomeFinancialBehaviorBusinessPracticeBusinessPerformanceAttitudesTotalSignificance at 10%negative 2.5% 3.2% 9.5% 5.2% 4.3% 3.0% 4.2%insignificant 68.2% 72.8% 67.5% 54.8% 71.2% 63.0% 67.6%positive 29.3% 23.9% 23.0% 40.0% 24.5% 34.0% 28.2%Significance at 5%negative 1.7% 2.3% 7.9% 1.9% 2.7% 2.0% 2.8%insignificant 76.0% 78.0% 74.6% 66.5% 80.4% 73.0% 75.5%positive 22.3% 19.7% 17.5% 31.6% 16.8% 25.0% 21.7%Effect SizeOverall average 0.065 0.036 0.034 0.106 0.044 0.090 0.058Average among positvelysignicant at 10%Average among positvelysignicant at 5%0.181 0.136 0.204 0.254 0.154 0.180 0.1830.192 0.147 0.224 0.283 0.173 0.200 0.20031
Page 1 and 2: Entrepreneurship Programs in Develo
Page 3 and 4: through school curricula, 5 while o
Page 5 and 6: youth the largest effects come from
Page 7 and 8: part of their intervention can grea
Page 9 and 10: working papers. About three quarter
Page 11 and 12: different variables and studies. Gi
Page 13 and 14: As discussed in the previous sectio
Page 15 and 16: Column 5 presents a model including
Page 17 and 18: is most common and often provided w
Page 19 and 20: examining the sample according to t
Page 22 and 23: examined attitudes and financial be
Page 25: Dawson, C., A. Henley, and P. L. La
Page 28 and 29: Table 1. Distribution and Definitio
Page 33 and 34: Table 6. Comparisons of Different M
Page 35 and 36: Table 8. Probit Model Regressions f
Page 37 and 38: Table 10. Random Effect Regression
Page 39 and 40: Figure 3. Comparison of Probit and
Page 41 and 42: Table A1. (Continued)Study id Group
Page 43 and 44: Table A2: Summary of Effect Size by
Page 45 and 46: Table A4. Random Effect Regression

Entrepreneurship Programs in Developing Countries: A ... - IYFLive.net

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?