271. Coryphopterus humeralis R<strong>and</strong>all, 2001b:212, figs. 5–6= Fusigobius humeralis (R<strong>and</strong>all)Para<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 60501 (3, 25.2–28.0), Taiwan, S end at Maopitou, rock <strong>and</strong> rubble bottom with caves, 15 m, 18Jul. 1978, coll. J. E. R<strong>and</strong>all et al.Other <strong>type</strong>: BPBM 32955 (holo<strong>type</strong>) <strong>and</strong> para<strong>type</strong>.272. Cristatogobius albius Chen, 1959:209, fig. 1Holo<strong>type</strong>: TFRI 3929 (37.5), Tong–kang, southeastern Taiwan, Jan. 1958, coll. H.–C. Yang.Remark. This species was once synonymized with Cristatogobius nonatoae (Ablan) by Akihito <strong>and</strong> Meguro(2000), but Larson <strong>and</strong> Murdy (2001) recognized it as valid.273. Cryptocentrus yangii Chen, 1960:11, fig. 1= Myersina yangii (Chen)Syn<strong>type</strong>: NTUM uncat. (7, 4 males <strong>and</strong> 3 females, 67.7–89.3), Fang–liaw, the most southern part <strong>of</strong> Taiwan,bottom trawlers, may 1960; TFRI uncat. (not seen)Remark. This species is considered as an endemic <strong>and</strong> extinct species. Acorrding to the original description, therewere seven specimens collected from Fang–liaw. Those specimens might be deposited in NTUM. There arealso specimens collected from Tung–kang <strong>and</strong> deposited in TFRI, but not seen by us.274. Cryptocentrus yatsui Tomiyama, 1936:81, fig. 31Holo<strong>type</strong>: ZUMT 25229 (90), Tainan market, Formosa.Para<strong>type</strong>: ZUMT 14894–8 (5) <strong>and</strong> ZUMT 25228 (6, 65–80), came data as holo<strong>type</strong>.Remark. Five para<strong>type</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the <strong>type</strong> series (ZUMT 14894–8) were apparently lost (Kazuo Sakamoto, Pers. Comm.Oct. 2007).275. Ctenogobius c<strong>and</strong>idianus Regan, 1908a:153= Rhinogobius c<strong>and</strong>idianus (Regan)Syn<strong>type</strong>: BMNH 1908.5.27.29–33 (5), Lake C<strong>and</strong>idius, Taiwan; SMNS 4380 (5), Lake C<strong>and</strong>idius, Formosa, coll.Hans Sauter.Remark. We followed Chen <strong>and</strong> Shao (1996) <strong>and</strong> Chen (2008) to recognize it as a valid species.276. Ctenogobiops formosa R<strong>and</strong>all, Shao <strong>and</strong> Chen, 2003:509, fig. 3–5Holo<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 61575 (male, 45.7), s<strong>and</strong> bottom, Nanwan, Pingtung County, southern Taiwan, depth 10–12 m, 6Nov. 1998, coll. J.–P. Chen.Para<strong>type</strong>s: ASIZP 61576 (1, female, 35.7), same collecting data as for holo<strong>type</strong>, the burrow less than 1 m from that<strong>of</strong> holo<strong>type</strong> <strong>and</strong> its female pair; BPBM 38479 (1, male, 35.8), outside intake bay <strong>of</strong> Third Nuclear Power Plant,Nanwan, 12 m,7 Nov. 1997, coll. J.–P. Chen; NMMBP 2404 (1, female, 40.7), taken with holo<strong>type</strong>.277. Flabelligobius smithi Chen <strong>and</strong> Fang, 2003:334, figs. 1–3= Tomiyamichthys smithi (Chen <strong>and</strong> Fang)Holo<strong>type</strong>: NMMBP 1905 (95.2), Taiwan Strait <strong>of</strong>f Tongkang, Pingtung County, Taiwan, ca.100 m, 6 Aug. 1996,coll. S.–H. Lai.Para<strong>type</strong>: NMMBP 1906 (1, 95.8); NMMBP 1907 (1, 97.9); data same as holo<strong>type</strong>.278. Fusigobius duospilus Hoese <strong>and</strong> Reader, 1985:2Para<strong>type</strong>: USNM 263459 (2, 31–38), [21°55’48”N, 120°48’48”E], SW shore <strong>of</strong>f Ch’uan–fan–shih, [S. Taiwan,] 6–7 m, 3 May 1968, coll. V. G. Springer et al.Other <strong>type</strong>: AMS I.22619–026 (holo<strong>type</strong>) <strong>and</strong> 189 para<strong>type</strong>s.56 · Zootaxa 2957 © 2011 <strong>Magnolia</strong> <strong>Press</strong>HO & SHAO
279. Glossogobius abacopus Jordan <strong>and</strong> Richardson, 1909:200, pl. L24= Glossogobius biocellatus (Valenciennes)Holo<strong>type</strong>: FMNH 52210 (formly CM 357), Takao, coll. Hans Sauter.Parao<strong>type</strong>: FMNH 59540 (1) <strong>and</strong> SU 21258 (2), same as holo<strong>type</strong>.Remark. The figured specimen is labeled as <strong>type</strong> <strong>and</strong> has been determined to be holo<strong>type</strong>.280. Glossogobius parvus Oshima, 1919:305, pl.53, fig. 3= Mugilogobius cavifrons (Weber)Holo<strong>type</strong>: FMNH 59138 [ex CM 8276] (44 TL), a small isl<strong>and</strong> near Kizanto, near Giran [I–Lan], Taiwan.281. Gnatholepis davaoensis Seale, 1910:537Neo<strong>type</strong>: BPBM 18670, S end <strong>of</strong> Hou Pi Hoo, Taiwan, 0–0.2 m.Remark. Holo<strong>type</strong> (BSMP 3858, 45 TL) has been destroyed; a neo<strong>type</strong> was designated by R<strong>and</strong>all <strong>and</strong> Greenfield(2001).282. Oxyurichthys formosanus Nichols, 1958:4, fig. 1Holo<strong>type</strong>: AMNH 20323 (55 TL), from the Tam–sui River, Formosa, 27 sep. 1956, coll. Myles Walsh, III.283. Priolepis fallacincta Winterbottom <strong>and</strong> Burridge, 1992:1940, figs. 1, 6, 7Para<strong>type</strong>s: SAIAB [formerly RUSI] 35455 (1, 19.7), 22°06’N, 120°45’E, Rentin [In error, Kenting] National Park,<strong>of</strong>f Houpihu, 20 Jan. 1988, coll. P. Heemstra et al.Other <strong>type</strong>: ROM 53146 (holo<strong>type</strong>) <strong>and</strong> 26 para<strong>type</strong>s.284. Priolepis kappa Winterbottom <strong>and</strong> Burridge, 1993:501, figs.9–10Para<strong>type</strong>: USNM (1, 19.0), 21°55’48”N, 120°48’48”E, SW shore, just <strong>of</strong>f Ch'uan–Fan–Shih, 7.5–8.5 m, 3 May1968, coll. V. G. Springer et al.Other <strong>type</strong>: ROM 58052 (holo<strong>type</strong>) <strong>and</strong> 28 para<strong>type</strong>s.285. Priolepis latifascima Winterbottom <strong>and</strong> Burridge, 1993:504, figs. 11–13Para<strong>type</strong>: BPBM 23094 (1, 18.5), N shore, W side <strong>of</strong> peninsula at Yeh–liu, rocky shore, 0–2 m, 28 Jun. 1978, coll.J. E. R<strong>and</strong>all et al.Other <strong>type</strong>: LICPP 1982161 (holo<strong>type</strong>) <strong>and</strong> 3 para<strong>type</strong>s.286. Rhinogobius delicatus Chen <strong>and</strong> Shao, 1996:208, figs.8–9Holo<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 57227 (64.9), Shokulwan R., Hualien County, 29 Dec. 1993.Para<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 57228 (13, 36.0–63.1), Shinwulwu River, Taitung County, 14 Sep. 1992; ASIZP 57229 (6, 48.5–62.7), Marwuku River, Taitung County, 12 Dec. 1992; ASIZP 57230 (1, 55.2), Shokulwan River, HwalienCounty, 29 Dec. 1993.287. Rhinogobius formosanus Oshima, 1919:300, pl.53, fig. 2Holo<strong>type</strong>: FMNH 59135 (formly CM 8273) (65 TL), Shinchiku, Dec. 1916, coll. T. Aoki.Remark. Chen <strong>and</strong> Shao (1996) recognized it as a valid subspecies <strong>of</strong> R. nagoyae. Here, we follow Chen (2008) torecognize it as a valid species.288. Rhinogobius gigas Aonuma <strong>and</strong> Chen, 1996:9, fig. 1Holo<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 57224 (80.5), Shinwulwu R. <strong>of</strong> Pein<strong>and</strong>ar R. , Taitung Co. , Taiwan, 12 Dec. 1992.Para<strong>type</strong>: ASIZP 57225 (3, 39.9–57.4), Sanjan River, Hualian County; ASIZP 57226 (8, 51.7–67.4), Nanau River,Ilan County, 8 Sep. 1993; NMBM P0302 (3, 27.6–48.9), Kinglun River, Taitung County, Taiwan, 21 Dec.1993.TYPE CATALOG OF TAIWANESE FISHESZootaxa 2957 © 2011 <strong>Magnolia</strong> <strong>Press</strong> · 57
- Page 2:
HSUAN-CHING HO & KWANG-TSAO SHAOAnn
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE 1. List of all nominal specie
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE 1 (continued)Original name St
- Page 11 and 12: TABLE 1 (continued)Original name St
- Page 13 and 14: TABLE 1 (continued)Original name St
- Page 15 and 16: Holotype/ Lectotype Paratype/ Paral
- Page 17 and 18: 10. Paramyxine yangi Teng, 1958:3,
- Page 19 and 20: Etmopteridae (036)25. Etmopterus bu
- Page 21 and 22: Holotype: unknown (male, 737 TL), K
- Page 23 and 24: Ophichthidae (081)56. Brachysomophi
- Page 25 and 26: Lissochilichthys Oshima, 1920a:124=
- Page 27 and 28: 78. Culter aokii Oshima, 1919:250,
- Page 29 and 30: 92. Opsariichthys barbatus Regan, 1
- Page 31 and 32: Holotype: ANSP 49949 (233 TL), Bura
- Page 33 and 34: 118. Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Ch
- Page 35 and 36: Remark. Technically, Salmo saramao
- Page 37 and 38: 141. Ventrifossa nigrodorsalis Gilb
- Page 39 and 40: specimens collected from Toko at th
- Page 41 and 42: 165. Scorpaenopsis possi Randall an
- Page 43 and 44: 179. Pseudochromis striatus Gill, S
- Page 45 and 46: 193. Caranx formosanus Jordan and S
- Page 47 and 48: 206. Nemipterus matsubarae Jordan a
- Page 49 and 50: 221. Chromis delta Randall, 1988:78
- Page 51 and 52: Pinguipedidae (435)237. Neopercis m
- Page 53 and 54: 07857 (1, 17.7), same as holotype;
- Page 55: Eleotridae (457)264. Eleotris fasci
- Page 59 and 60: 33.8), Lu-liao River, Pingtung Coun
- Page 61 and 62: Family Paralichthyidae (492)Spinirh
- Page 63 and 64: 326. Symphurus megasomus Lee, Chen
- Page 65 and 66: FIGURE 7. Holotype of Leuciscus sch
- Page 67 and 68: 1995, 689-693.Chen, J.-P. & Shao, K
- Page 69 and 70: a description of two new genera and
- Page 71 and 72: Oshima, M. (1924) A list of the car
- Page 73 and 74: adjacent islands. 2. Notes on some