13.07.2015 Views

Developing a Strategic Approach to Construction Waste

Developing a Strategic Approach to Construction Waste

Developing a Strategic Approach to Construction Waste

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Developing</strong> A <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Approach</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Construction</strong> <strong>Waste</strong>Restricted – CommercialAEA/ED02414/Issue 1Good way of demonstrating CSR and good forPR - they write environmental reports everyyear3a -Have any legislationsmade working easier?The legislations mean they have a lot morework <strong>to</strong> do and costs of recycling frequentlymean that it is cheaper <strong>to</strong> send waste <strong>to</strong>landfill than it is <strong>to</strong> recycle e.g. in ruralareas. This is due <strong>to</strong> the costs associatedwith transporting the waste <strong>to</strong> the recyclingpoint. With transport making up 70% ofwaste disposal costs, recycling depots need<strong>to</strong> be made as accessible as landfill access.4 Do you think the More than sufficient. The legislations needcurrent waste simplification and need <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p changinglegislation is sufficient? e.g. <strong>Waste</strong> Exemptions legislation 2005 hasbeen changed so now requires anapplication 35 days in advance of beinggranted "exemption". Some legislationseven require consultants <strong>to</strong> report on siteswaste disposal which is not practical or costefficient.4 Do you think thea current wastelegislation is efficientlyenforced? If not, whatmore could be done?The company feel it is only enforced if youtry adhering <strong>to</strong> legislations correctly whilstSMEs not adhering <strong>to</strong> the legislations arethought not <strong>to</strong> be regulated at all.5 Do you have any other There are some <strong>Waste</strong> Pro<strong>to</strong>cols in place,comments regarding but more best practice/waste pro<strong>to</strong>colswaste legislations i.e. need <strong>to</strong> be developed i.e. EA and WRAPsdo current legislations Composting needs <strong>to</strong> be developedencourage you <strong>to</strong> buy quicker. Pro<strong>to</strong>cols are needed for PFA andsupplies any differently tyre bundling, which is used by the EA inor encourage/force your some of their development, but rejected insuppliers <strong>to</strong> sell other company applications."sustainable"/recyclablIt just needs streamlining and simplifying -sometimes it detracts from purposeNo.Yes – but danger with more legislationit will increase attractiveness of illegalpractices/flytipping.No, much more on the groundenforcement needed – have only seenone Environment Agency Officer onour sites in the last 7 years!! Couldutilise rfid tags <strong>to</strong> track waste materialsInconsistent application/enforcement indifferent EA regions makeinterpretation difficult. EA officers notalways helpful in their attitude <strong>to</strong>wardsour industry. Duty of Care paperworkshould be produced in a standardformat, and if we are made <strong>to</strong> registerfor hazardous waste anyway, why notuse the site code for all waste. MakeAEA Energy & Environment 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!